Round 14 — BAM Kids Qualifier
11 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA SHJS 1 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | SHENGXING RED | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHILE | ITALY | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | CHINA SHJS 2 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SHENGXING MARS | NORWAY U16 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | CHINA SHJS 3 | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | GERMANY | SHENGXING JUPITER | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | SHENGXING GREEN | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | INDIA | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHENGXING MARS | 58.00 | 6.00 | 14 |
| 2 | 🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 | 53.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 3 | 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 49.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 3 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 49.00 | 5.00 | 14 |
| 5 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 48.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 6 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 | 44.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 7 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 43.00 | 6.00 | 14 |
| 7 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 | 43.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 7 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY | 43.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 7 | SHENGXING RED | 43.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 11 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 42.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 12 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 40.00 | 6.00 | 14 |
| 12 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 40.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 12 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 40.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 15 | SHENGXING GREEN | 39.00 | 5.00 | 14 |
| 16 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 38.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 16 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 38.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 16 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 | 38.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 16 | 🇮🇹 ITALY | 38.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 20 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 35.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 21 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 34.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 22 | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 29.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE 2 : 4 VP (match 52781) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | |
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♦5 | = | 620 | 52% | 2♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 5♠ | E | ♣3 | -3 | 150 | 55% | 5♦ | S | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 430 | 100% | 1NT | E | ♦Q | +1 | 120 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 71% | ||||
| 11 | 5♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TJ BRIDGE 1 vs SHENGXING YELLOW 4 : 2 VP (match 52782) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TJ BRIDGE 1 | SHENGXING YELLOW | |
| 10 | 3♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 140 | 88% | 4♥ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 5♦ | S | ♠J | = | 400 | 76% | 4♠x | E | ♦J | -2 | 300 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♥2 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | W | ♥9 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 81% | ||||
| 11 | 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 57% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA SHJS 1 vs TJ BRIDGE 2 4 : 2 VP (match 52783) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 1 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | |
| 10 | 3♥x | W | ♦7 | +1 | 930 | 100% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +1 | 430 | 93% | 5♠ | E | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | E | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3NT | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 3♥x | W | +1 | 930 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 81% | ||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 vs SHENGXING RED 6 : 0 VP (match 52784) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | SHENGXING RED | |
| 10 | 4♠x | N | ♥Q | = | 790 | 98% | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 5♠ | E | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.6 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 4♠x | N | = | 790 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 11 | 5♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇱 CHILE vs 🇮🇹 ITALY 4 : 2 VP (match 52785) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | ITALY | |
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 4♦ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 150 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♥A | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇱 | 🇮🇹 | |||||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 52% | ||||
| 11 | 4♦ | N | +1 | 150 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 2 : 4 VP (match 52786) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | CHINA SHJS 2 | |
| 10 | 5♥ | W | ♠6 | = | 650 | 81% | 4♥ | E | ♦8 | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 5♦ | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 76% | 3♦x | N | ♠A | +2 | 670 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 90% | 3NT | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 10 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 52% | ||||
| 11 | 5♦ | N | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | N | +2 | 670 | 100% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING MARS vs NORWAY U16 6 : 0 VP (match 52787) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING MARS | NORWAY U16 | |
| 10 | 4♠x | N | ♥Q | = | 790 | 98% | 4♥ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +1 | 430 | 93% | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♠8 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 3NT | E | ♦4 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.6 | NS-1.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 4♠x | N | = | 790 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 81% | ||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 4 : 2 VP (match 52788) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | CHINA SHJS 3 | |
| 10 | 3♠ | N | ♥2 | = | 140 | 88% | 4♥ | W | ♠3 | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 5♦ | N | ♦2 | = | 400 | 76% | 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♥2 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 10 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 52% | ||||
| 11 | 5♦ | N | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 57% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SHENGXING JUPITER 1 : 5 VP (match 52789) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SHENGXING JUPITER | |
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♦2 | = | 620 | 52% | 3♥ | W | ♣A | +2 | 200 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 4♠x | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 67% | 5♠x | E | ♦J | -2 | 300 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | W | ♦4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | +2 | 200 | 62% | ||||
| 11 | 4♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 57% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS vs SHENGXING GREEN 1 : 5 VP (match 52790) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | SHENGXING GREEN | |
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 81% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 76% | 5♦ | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 81% | ||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | N | = | 400 | 76% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA vs AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES 0 : 6 VP (match 52791) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | |
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2♥ | E | ♦8 | +2 | 170 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 11 | 3♠ | E | ♦4 | = | 140 | 100% | 5♦ | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.0 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 67% | ||||
| 11 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | N | = | 400 | 76% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.0 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|