Round 9 — BAM JYG Qualifier
6 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | GERMANY | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ITALIA | SHENGXING TEAM 4 | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHILE | WHITEWALKERS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | COLOMBIA | CUST | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ ROSE | SRBIJA VAJS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | INDIA | BRASIL | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHILE | 38.80 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 2 | GERMANY | 35.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 3 | WHITEWALKERS | 33.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 4 | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | 29.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 5 | COLOMBIA | 28.00 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 5 | SRBIJA VAJS | 28.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 7 | BRASIL | 27.00 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 8 | CHINA RDFZ ROSE | 26.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 9 | INDIA | 22.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 10 | CUST | 19.80 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 11 | SHENGXING TEAM 4 | 19.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 12 | ITALIA | 18.00 | 5.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
SHENGXING TEAM 2 vs GERMANY 2 : 4 VP (match 52851) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | GERMANY | |
| 25 | 6♠ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 7♠ | N | ♠9 | = | 1510 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 1NT | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2♠ | W | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♣K | = | 110 | 91% | 2♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA vs SHENGXING TEAM 4 5 : 1 VP (match 52852) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA | SHENGXING TEAM 4 | |
| 25 | 6♠ | N | ♦10 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 4♠ | N | ♦8 | +3 | 510 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♥ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 68% | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | = | 110 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♥Q | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2♠ | S | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.8 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 100% | ||||
| 26 | 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 68% | ||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs WHITEWALKERS 4 : 2 VP (match 52853) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | WHITEWALKERS | |
| 25 | 6NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 1020 | 82% | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | W | ♣J | = | 110 | 68% | 1NT | W | ♦Q | = | 90 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 27 | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2NT | E | ♠6 | +2 | 180 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 73% | ||||
| 27 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COLOMBIA vs CUST 5 : 1 VP (match 52854) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COLOMBIA | CUST | |
| 25 | 6♠ | N | ♦10 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 6♠ | S | ♣8 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 26 | 3NT | W | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2♣ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 110 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 27 | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 3♠ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.9 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | +1 | 1010 | 55% | ||||
| 26 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | W | +1 | 110 | 68% | ||||
| 27 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ ROSE vs SRBIJA VAJS 4 : 2 VP (match 52855) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ ROSE | SRBIJA VAJS | |
| 25 | 6♠ | N | ♠9 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 6NT | S | ♣2 | = | 990 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | E | ♦8 | = | 110 | 68% | 2NT | W | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 27 | 2NT | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2♦ | S | ♣K | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 91% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 27 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | S | -4 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA vs BRASIL 1 : 5 VP (match 52856) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA | BRASIL | |
| 25 | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 7♠ | N | ♠4 | = | 1510 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | W | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 100% | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 27 | 2NT | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3♣ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 68% | ||||
| 27 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|