Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	MAZURKIEWICZ
2	JINSHUO
3	PERCY
4	ZIMMERMANN
5-8	BRULIBU
5-8	THE MAGICDOGS
5-8	CHINA XHJT
5-8	PIEDRA

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	MAZURKIEWICZ	35	28	protocol →
	Open EWO.Neve – Z.Engel -0.1 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Backes – P.Bocken +8.4 / 16 bd
1	MAZURKIEWICZ	42	36	protocol →
	Open EWO.Neve – Z.Engel +11.6 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Backes – P.Bocken -1.9 / 16 bd
1	MAZURKIEWICZ	8	41	protocol →
	Open EWO.Neve – Z.Engel -24.5 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Backes – P.Bocken -11.7 / 16 bd
Total IMP	85

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	JINSHUO	22	24	protocol →
	Open EWX.Wang – H.Huang +1.6 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Bian – X.Cao -3.4 / 16 bd
1	JINSHUO	7	41	protocol →
	Open EWX.Wang – H.Huang -8.4 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Bian – X.Cao -28.4 / 16 bd
1	JINSHUO	36	26	protocol →
	Open EWX.Wang – H.Huang +12.8 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Bian – X.Cao -3.5 / 16 bd
Total IMP	65

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	CHINA XHJT	24	22	protocol →
	Open NSX.Zhang – T.Jiang -1.6 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki +3.4 / 16 bd
1	CHINA XHJT	41	7	protocol →
	Open NSM.Nowosadzki – J.Kalita +8.4 / 16 bdClosed EWC.Ju – Z.Shi +28.4 / 16 bd
1	CHINA XHJT	26	36	protocol →
	Open NSM.Nowosadzki – J.Kalita -12.8 / 16 bdClosed EWZ.Shi – C.Ju +3.5 / 16 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	11	19	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -27.6 / 16 bdClosed NSX.Zhang – T.Jiang +16.3 / 16 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	31	25	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -7.3 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Ju – Z.Shi +17.0 / 16 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	34	26	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -0.3 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Ju – Z.Shi +14.0 / 16 bd
3	MAZURKIEWICZ	37	46	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki +3.4 / 16 bdClosed NSX.Zhang – T.Jiang -16.7 / 16 bd
3	MAZURKIEWICZ	26	18	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki +6.8 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Ju – Z.Shi +4.2 / 16 bd
3	MAZURKIEWICZ	16	25	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -9.0 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Ju – Z.Shi -9.0 / 16 bd
Total IMP	246

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	BRULIBU	28	35	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem +0.1 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys -8.4 / 16 bd
1	BRULIBU	36	42	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem -11.6 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys +1.9 / 16 bd
1	BRULIBU	41	8	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem +24.5 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys +11.7 / 16 bd
2	PERCY	35	25	protocol →
	Open NSP.Gawrys – M.Klukowski -15.6 / 16 bdClosed EWK.Jassem – M.Mazurkiewicz +28.2 / 16 bd
2	PERCY	8	27	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem -25.6 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys -1.3 / 16 bd
2	PERCY	37	15	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem +8.3 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys +22.8 / 16 bd
3	JINSHUO	46	37	protocol →
	Open NSP.Gawrys – M.Klukowski -3.4 / 16 bdClosed EWK.Jassem – M.Mazurkiewicz +16.7 / 16 bd
3	JINSHUO	18	26	protocol →
	Open NSP.Gawrys – M.Klukowski -6.8 / 16 bdClosed EWK.Jassem – M.Mazurkiewicz -4.2 / 16 bd
3	JINSHUO	25	16	protocol →
	Open NSM.Mazurkiewicz – K.Jassem +9.0 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Klukowski – P.Gawrys +9.0 / 16 bd
Total IMP	274

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	THE MAGICDOGS	19	27	protocol →
	Open NSP.Crouch – A.Sinclair +6.0 / 16 bdClosed EWZ.Mahmood – M.Michielsen -16.6 / 16 bd
1	THE MAGICDOGS	41	1	protocol →
	Open NSM.Michielsen – Z.Mahmood +33.5 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Robson – D.Gold +10.6 / 16 bd
1	THE MAGICDOGS	34	32	protocol →
	Open NSM.Michielsen – Z.Mahmood +16.1 / 16 bdClosed EWD.Gold – A.Robson -15.8 / 16 bd
2	MAZURKIEWICZ	25	35	protocol →
	Open EWA.Robson – D.Gold +15.6 / 16 bdClosed NSA.Sinclair – P.Crouch -28.2 / 16 bd
2	MAZURKIEWICZ	27	8	protocol →
	Open EWA.Robson – D.Gold +25.6 / 16 bdClosed NSM.Michielsen – Z.Mahmood +1.3 / 16 bd
2	MAZURKIEWICZ	15	37	protocol →
	Open EWZ.Mahmood – M.Michielsen -8.3 / 16 bdClosed NSD.Gold – A.Robson -22.8 / 16 bd
3	ZIMMERMANN	48	7	protocol →
	Open EWA.Sinclair – P.Crouch +16.9 / 16 bdClosed NSD.Gold – A.Robson +37.0 / 16 bd
3	ZIMMERMANN	54	35	protocol →
	Open EWA.Robson – D.Gold +14.6 / 16 bdClosed NSM.Michielsen – Z.Mahmood +17.5 / 16 bd
Total IMP	263

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	ZIMMERMANN	34	38	protocol →
	Open EWA.Wildavsky – H.Weinstein +12.5 / 16 bdClosed NSB.Igla – F.Piedra -13.7 / 16 bd
1	ZIMMERMANN	37	12	protocol →
	Open EWA.Wildavsky – H.Weinstein +7.7 / 16 bdClosed NSB.Igla – F.Piedra +19.0 / 16 bd
1	ZIMMERMANN	19	54	protocol →
	Open EWA.Wildavsky – H.Weinstein -6.6 / 16 bdClosed NSB.Igla – F.Piedra -35.5 / 16 bd
Total IMP	90

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	PERCY	27	19	protocol →
	Open EWF.Gitelman – S.Winestock -6.0 / 16 bdClosed NSD.Korbel – S.Shi +16.6 / 16 bd
1	PERCY	1	41	protocol →
	Open EWF.Gitelman – G.Cohler -33.5 / 16 bdClosed NSD.Korbel – S.Shi -10.6 / 16 bd
1	PERCY	32	34	protocol →
	Open EWS.Shi – D.Korbel -16.1 / 16 bdClosed NSF.Gitelman – G.Cohler +15.8 / 16 bd
Total IMP	60

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	PIEDRA	38	34	protocol →
	Open NSF.Multon – G.Helgemo -12.5 / 16 bdClosed EWL.Lauria – A.Versace +13.7 / 16 bd
1	PIEDRA	12	37	protocol →
	Open NSK.Martens – P.Zimmermann -7.7 / 16 bdClosed EWL.Lauria – A.Versace -19.0 / 16 bd
1	PIEDRA	54	19	protocol →
	Open NSL.Lauria – A.Versace +6.6 / 16 bdClosed EWF.Multon – G.Helgemo +35.5 / 16 bd
2	JINSHUO	19	11	protocol →
	Open NSL.Lauria – A.Versace +27.6 / 16 bdClosed EWG.Helgemo – F.Multon -16.3 / 16 bd
2	JINSHUO	25	31	protocol →
	Open NSL.Lauria – A.Versace +7.3 / 16 bdClosed EWP.Zimmermann – K.Martens -17.0 / 16 bd
2	JINSHUO	26	34	protocol →
	Open NSF.Multon – G.Helgemo +0.3 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Versace – L.Lauria -14.0 / 16 bd
3	PERCY	7	48	protocol →
	Open NSK.Martens – P.Zimmermann -16.9 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Versace – L.Lauria -37.0 / 16 bd
3	PERCY	35	54	protocol →
	Open NSF.Multon – G.Helgemo -14.6 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Versace – L.Lauria -17.5 / 16 bd
Total IMP	216

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	Qual.	QF·1	QF·2	QF·3	SF·1	SF·2	SF·3	F·1	F·2	F·3
1	C.Ju	JINSHUO	96	+58.1	+0.61	+77.3	+28.4	+3.5	·	+17.0	+14.0	·	+4.2	-9.0	·
1	Z.Shi	JINSHUO	96	+58.1	+0.61	+77.3	+28.4	+3.5	·	+17.0	+14.0	·	+4.2	-9.0	·
3	D.Gold	PERCY	112	+64.8	+0.58	+88.7	+10.6	-15.8	·	+15.6	+25.6	-22.8	+37.0	+14.6	·
3	A.Robson	PERCY	112	+64.8	+0.58	+88.7	+10.6	-15.8	·	+15.6	+25.6	-22.8	+37.0	+14.6	·
5	Z.Mahmood	PERCY	96	+43.5	+0.45	+68.7	-16.6	+33.5	+16.1	+1.3	-8.3	·	+17.5	·	·
5	M.Michielsen	PERCY	96	+43.5	+0.45	+68.7	-16.6	+33.5	+16.1	+1.3	-8.3	·	+17.5	·	·
7	K.Jassem	MAZURKIEWICZ	144	+45.4	+0.32	+74.8	+0.1	-11.6	+24.5	+28.2	-25.6	+8.3	+16.7	-4.2	+9.0
7	M.Mazurkiewicz	MAZURKIEWICZ	144	+45.4	+0.32	+74.8	+0.1	-11.6	+24.5	+28.2	-25.6	+8.3	+16.7	-4.2	+9.0
9	H.Weinstein	PIEDRA	48	+13.6	+0.28	+31.4	+12.5	+7.7	-6.6	·	·	·	·	·	·
9	A.Wildavsky	PIEDRA	48	+13.6	+0.28	+31.4	+12.5	+7.7	-6.6	·	·	·	·	·	·
11	H.Huang	CHINA XHJT	48	+6.0	+0.12	+80.2	+1.6	-8.4	+12.8	·	·	·	·	·	·
11	X.Wang	CHINA XHJT	48	+6.0	+0.12	+80.2	+1.6	-8.4	+12.8	·	·	·	·	·	·
13	P.Gawrys	MAZURKIEWICZ	144	+9.9	+0.07	+92.8	-8.4	+1.9	+11.7	-15.6	-1.3	+22.8	-3.4	-6.8	+9.0
13	M.Klukowski	MAZURKIEWICZ	144	+9.9	+0.07	+92.8	-8.4	+1.9	+11.7	-15.6	-1.3	+22.8	-3.4	-6.8	+9.0
15	T.Jiang	JINSHUO	48	-2.0	-0.04	-29.3	-1.6	·	·	+16.3	·	·	-16.7	·	·
15	X.Zhang	JINSHUO	48	-2.0	-0.04	-29.3	-1.6	·	·	+16.3	·	·	-16.7	·	·
17	G.Helgemo	ZIMMERMANN	80	-7.6	-0.10	+93.3	-12.5	+35.5	·	-16.3	+0.3	·	-14.6	·	·
17	F.Multon	ZIMMERMANN	80	-7.6	-0.10	+93.3	-12.5	+35.5	·	-16.3	+0.3	·	-14.6	·	·
19	J.Backes	BRULIBU	48	-5.2	-0.11	-4.4	+8.4	-1.9	-11.7	·	·	·	·	·	·
19	P.Bocken	BRULIBU	48	-5.2	-0.11	-4.4	+8.4	-1.9	-11.7	·	·	·	·	·	·
21	P.Crouch	PERCY	48	-5.3	-0.11	+15.2	+6.0	·	·	-28.2	·	·	+16.9	·	·
21	A.Sinclair	PERCY	48	-5.3	-0.11	+15.2	+6.0	·	·	-28.2	·	·	+16.9	·	·
23	D.Korbel	THE MAGICDOGS	48	-10.1	-0.21	+74.1	+16.6	-10.6	-16.1	·	·	·	·	·	·
23	S.Shi	THE MAGICDOGS	48	-10.1	-0.21	+74.1	+16.6	-10.6	-16.1	·	·	·	·	·	·
25	J.Kalita	JINSHUO	144	-35.0	-0.24	+127.6	+3.4	+8.4	-12.8	-27.6	-7.3	-0.3	+3.4	+6.8	-9.0
25	M.Nowosadzki	JINSHUO	144	-35.0	-0.24	+127.6	+3.4	+8.4	-12.8	-27.6	-7.3	-0.3	+3.4	+6.8	-9.0
27	L.Lauria	ZIMMERMANN	128	-32.3	-0.25	+77.9	+13.7	-19.0	+6.6	+27.6	+7.3	-14.0	-37.0	-17.5	·
27	A.Versace	ZIMMERMANN	128	-32.3	-0.25	+77.9	+13.7	-19.0	+6.6	+27.6	+7.3	-14.0	-37.0	-17.5	·
29	Z.Engel	BRULIBU	48	-13.0	-0.27	+125.2	-0.1	+11.6	-24.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
29	O.Neve	BRULIBU	48	-13.0	-0.27	+125.2	-0.1	+11.6	-24.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
31	S.Winestock	THE MAGICDOGS	16	-6.0	-0.38	+31.9	-6.0	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
32	F.Gitelman	THE MAGICDOGS	48	-23.7	-0.49	-0.1	-6.0	-33.5	+15.8	·	·	·	·	·	·
33	G.Cohler	THE MAGICDOGS	32	-17.7	-0.55	+46.0	-33.5	+15.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
34	B.Igla	PIEDRA	48	-30.2	-0.63	+78.2	-13.7	+19.0	-35.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
34	F.Piedra	PIEDRA	48	-30.2	-0.63	+78.2	-13.7	+19.0	-35.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
36	J.Bian	CHINA XHJT	48	-35.3	-0.74	+57.9	-3.4	-28.4	-3.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
36	X.Cao	CHINA XHJT	48	-35.3	-0.74	+57.9	-3.4	-28.4	-3.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
38	K.Martens	ZIMMERMANN	48	-41.6	-0.87	+30.2	-7.7	·	·	-17.0	·	·	-16.9	·	·
38	P.Zimmermann	ZIMMERMANN	48	-41.6	-0.87	+30.2	-7.7	·	·	-17.0	·	·	-16.9	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	C.Ju	+1.20
1	Z.Shi	+1.20
3	D.Gold	+1.12
3	A.Robson	+1.12
5	P.Gawrys	+0.28
5	M.Klukowski	+0.28
7	G.Helgemo	+0.12
7	F.Multon	+0.12
9	K.Jassem	-0.08
9	M.Mazurkiewicz	-0.08
11	Z.Mahmood	-0.22
11	M.Michielsen	-0.22
1	C.Ju	+1.20
1	Z.Shi	+1.20
3	D.Gold	+1.12
3	A.Robson	+1.12
5	P.Gawrys	+0.28
5	M.Klukowski	+0.28
7	G.Helgemo	+0.12
7	F.Multon	+0.12
9	K.Jassem	-0.08
9	M.Mazurkiewicz	-0.08
11	Z.Mahmood	-0.22
11	M.Michielsen	-0.22
13	L.Lauria	-0.42
13	A.Versace	-0.42
15	J.Kalita	-0.75
15	M.Nowosadzki	-0.75
17	H.Weinstein	+0.98
17	A.Wildavsky	+0.98
19	H.Huang	+0.96
19	X.Wang	+0.96
21	T.Jiang	+0.73
21	X.Zhang	+0.73
23	Z.Engel	+0.58
23	O.Neve	+0.58
25	D.Korbel	+0.04
25	S.Shi	+0.04
27	K.Martens	-0.27
27	P.Zimmermann	-0.27
29	P.Crouch	-0.33
29	A.Sinclair	-0.33
31	S.Winestock	-0.56
32	F.Gitelman	-0.79
33	G.Cohler	-0.91
34	J.Backes	-1.15
34	P.Bocken	-1.15
36	B.Igla	-1.25
36	F.Piedra	-1.25
38	J.Bian	-1.50
38	X.Cao	-1.50

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	C.Ju	100.0%
2	Z.Mahmood	93.8%
3	M.Klukowski	93.5%
4	J.Kalita	89.3%
5	P.Gawrys	87.8%
6	A.Robson	86.4%
7	M.Michielsen	82.8%
8	D.Gold	82.1%
9	M.Nowosadzki	79.5%
10	G.Helgemo	78.4%
11	K.Jassem	72.5%
12	M.Mazurkiewicz	72.2%
1	C.Ju	100.0%
2	Z.Mahmood	93.8%
3	M.Klukowski	93.5%
4	J.Kalita	89.3%
5	P.Gawrys	87.8%
6	A.Robson	86.4%
7	M.Michielsen	82.8%
8	D.Gold	82.1%
9	M.Nowosadzki	79.5%
10	G.Helgemo	78.4%
11	K.Jassem	72.5%
12	M.Mazurkiewicz	72.2%
13	L.Lauria	71.9%
14	A.Versace	71.9%
15	F.Multon	66.7%
16	Z.Shi	66.7%
17	S.Winestock	100.0%
17	F.Gitelman	100.0%
19	P.Bocken	90.9%
20	P.Zimmermann	87.5%
21	H.Huang	86.7%
22	P.Crouch	86.7%
23	X.Cao	85.7%
24	B.Igla	83.3%
25	J.Bian	83.3%
26	F.Piedra	81.2%
27	H.Weinstein	80.0%
28	Z.Engel	77.8%
29	X.Zhang	76.9%
30	T.Jiang	76.9%
31	K.Martens	75.0%
32	J.Backes	72.7%
33	S.Shi	71.4%
34	X.Wang	70.0%
35	G.Cohler	66.7%
36	A.Sinclair	62.5%
37	D.Korbel	60.0%
38	A.Wildavsky	20.0%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	P.Gawrys	88.2%
2	K.Jassem	87.5%
3	M.Klukowski	81.6%
4	A.Versace	80.0%
5	M.Nowosadzki	80.0%
6	M.Mazurkiewicz	79.1%
7	G.Helgemo	77.8%
8	F.Multon	77.8%
9	C.Ju	76.9%
10	D.Gold	76.7%
11	M.Michielsen	75.9%
12	A.Robson	75.0%
1	P.Gawrys	88.2%
2	K.Jassem	87.5%
3	M.Klukowski	81.6%
4	A.Versace	80.0%
5	M.Nowosadzki	80.0%
6	M.Mazurkiewicz	79.1%
7	G.Helgemo	77.8%
8	F.Multon	77.8%
9	C.Ju	76.9%
10	D.Gold	76.7%
11	M.Michielsen	75.9%
12	A.Robson	75.0%
13	Z.Mahmood	72.7%
14	L.Lauria	72.4%
15	J.Kalita	69.2%
16	Z.Shi	60.0%
17	S.Winestock	100.0%
18	P.Crouch	82.4%
19	X.Cao	81.8%
20	G.Cohler	77.8%
21	J.Backes	76.9%
22	S.Shi	76.9%
23	H.Huang	76.9%
23	P.Bocken	76.9%
25	A.Sinclair	75.0%
26	D.Korbel	72.7%
27	A.Wildavsky	66.7%
28	H.Weinstein	64.7%
29	F.Gitelman	63.6%
30	Z.Engel	61.9%
31	F.Piedra	58.3%
32	B.Igla	57.1%
33	J.Bian	54.5%
34	X.Wang	50.0%
35	K.Martens	50.0%
36	T.Jiang	46.2%
37	X.Zhang	44.4%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	J.Kalita	89.6%
1	M.Nowosadzki	89.6%
3	L.Lauria	89.1%
3	A.Versace	89.1%
5	D.Gold	88.5%
5	A.Robson	88.5%
7	P.Gawrys	87.5%
7	M.Klukowski	87.5%
9	K.Jassem	87.0%
9	M.Mazurkiewicz	87.0%
11	G.Helgemo	86.0%
11	F.Multon	86.0%
1	J.Kalita	89.6%
1	M.Nowosadzki	89.6%
3	L.Lauria	89.1%
3	A.Versace	89.1%
5	D.Gold	88.5%
5	A.Robson	88.5%
7	P.Gawrys	87.5%
7	M.Klukowski	87.5%
9	K.Jassem	87.0%
9	M.Mazurkiewicz	87.0%
11	G.Helgemo	86.0%
11	F.Multon	86.0%
13	C.Ju	85.1%
13	Z.Shi	85.1%
15	Z.Mahmood	77.8%
15	M.Michielsen	77.8%
17	H.Weinstein	100.0%
17	A.Wildavsky	100.0%
17	S.Winestock	100.0%
20	Z.Engel	96.3%
20	O.Neve	96.3%
22	H.Huang	96.0%
22	X.Wang	96.0%
24	D.Korbel	87.5%
24	S.Shi	87.5%
26	F.Gitelman	86.4%
27	K.Martens	83.3%
27	P.Zimmermann	83.3%
29	P.Crouch	82.6%
29	A.Sinclair	82.6%
31	B.Igla	81.8%
31	F.Piedra	81.8%
33	T.Jiang	80.8%
33	X.Zhang	80.8%
33	J.Bian	80.8%
33	X.Cao	80.8%
37	G.Cohler	80.0%
38	J.Backes	68.2%
38	P.Bocken	68.2%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Final · Bd 32	4	32.0	7♠ +100 PERCY (+17.7)	7♦ +2140 PERCY (+14.3)
Final · Bd 9	4	24.0	6♦ +920 PERCY (+12.0)	4♥ +150 MAZURKIEWICZ (+12.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 10	8	23.9	4♥x +1190 THE MAGICDOGS (+13.9)	4♥x +200 ZIMMERMANN (+10.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 5	8	22.8	6♥ +50 BRULIBU (+11.4)	6♥ +980 CHINA XHJT (+11.4)
Semifinal · Bd 31	4	22.7	6♥ +1430 MAZURKIEWICZ (+5.7)	7NT +100 ZIMMERMANN (+17.0)
Semifinal · Bd 39	4	21.3	3NT -600 JINSHUO (+7.0)	3♠x +1700 PERCY (+14.3)
Semifinal · Bd 47	4	21.0	2♦x +800 JINSHUO (+7.7)	3NT +200 JINSHUO (+13.3)
Final · Bd 8	4	21.0	4NT -490 PERCY (+13.0)	7♣ +1440 JINSHUO (+8.0)
Semifinal · Bd 28	4	20.7	4♠ +650 ZIMMERMANN (+9.0)	6♠ +400 MAZURKIEWICZ (+11.7)
Quarterfinal · Bd 30	8	20.6	7♠ +1510 BRULIBU (+12.3)	4♠ -510 BRULIBU (+8.3)
Semifinal · Bd 29	4	20.6	3NT +600 PERCY (+11.3)	3NT +200 ZIMMERMANN (+9.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 37	8	20.0	4♥x +990 MAZURKIEWICZ (+11.0)	4♠ -50 THE MAGICDOGS (+9.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 38	8	20.0	2♠x +500 CHINA XHJT (+7.7)	5♦x +500 ZIMMERMANN (+12.3)
Semifinal · Bd 25	4	18.7	7♠ +1510 MAZURKIEWICZ (+4.7)	3♦x -500 JINSHUO (+14.0)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Lyon 2017 — Knockout

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

BRULIBU — results↑ top

CHINA XHJT — results↑ top

JINSHUO — results↑ top

MAZURKIEWICZ — results↑ top

PERCY — results↑ top

PIEDRA — results↑ top

THE MAGICDOGS — results↑ top

ZIMMERMANN — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top