LI Xiaoyi · BEIJING TRINERGY
vs par split: bidding -0.80 · play -0.33
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.20/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.45/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 77.8% #307 of 466 · declarer play 70.0% #271 of 466 · defence 85.7% #280 of 466
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 71.4% (7) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 82.4% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 75.0% (4) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -1.09 (11) · a suit -1.14 (29)
vs par by level: part-score -2.65 (20) · game +1.22 (18) · slam -7.00 (2)
By role: declaring -0.80/bd (-3.26 vs par · 19) · defending -0.51/bd (+0.81 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.75/bd (-1.43 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.53/bd (-0.79 vs par · 19)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | Y.Wang | G.Helgemo – T.Helness | Open | 10 | +11.4 | +1.14 | +0.90 |
| Round 4 | Y.Wang | J.Nokleby – M.Milovic | Closed | 10 | -0.3 | -0.03 | -0.30 |
| Round 6 | Y.Wang | O.Saur – C.Kristoffersen | Open | 10 | -17.4 | -1.74 | -2.40 |
| Round 8 | Y.Wang | W.Starkowski – S.Golebiowski | Closed | 10 | -19.5 | -1.95 | -2.70 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.8 | Round 3 | MONACO | 30 | 4♥ | ♣4 | = | +8 |
| +4.1 | Round 3 | MONACO | 24 | 5♣x | ♠4 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.1 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 23 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | +6 |
| +3.8 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 22 | 3NT | ♥7 | = | +10 |
| +3.6 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 8 | 4♥ | ♣A | -1 | +10 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 1 | 2♥ | ♦6 | -1 | +4 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | MONACO | 22 | 2♥ | ♣4 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 3 | MONACO | 29 | 3NT | ♠J | +2 | +1 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | MONACO | 28 | 3♦ | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 7 | 2♥ | ♦5 | = | +11 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 11 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -1 | +10 |
| +2.0 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 3 | 4♣ | ♦5 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.8 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 20 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round 3 | MONACO | 27 | 2♠ | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 27 | 3♣ | ♥J | = | -1 |
| +0.4 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 26 | 3NT | ♦5 | +2 | -13 |
| +0.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 21 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 12 | 3♣ | ♠5 | -1 | +1 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 6 | 3NT | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 10 | 2♦ | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 3 | MONACO | 23 | 1NT | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 2 | 4♥ | ♦J | +1 | -4 |
| -0.9 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 18 | 3NT | ♠Q | = | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 14 | 1NT | ♥5 | -2 | +0 |
| -1.9 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 25 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round 3 | MONACO | 26 | 2♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 15 | 2♠ | ♦7 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.8 | Round 3 | MONACO | 21 | 3♣ | ♣5 | = | -6 |
| -2.8 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 19 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| -3.3 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 9 | 3♠ | ♥J | +1 | -10 |
| -3.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 30 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | -8 |
| -3.4 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 17 | 3♣ | ♣3 | +2 | -7 |
| -3.5 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 5 | 3♦ | ♣K | -2 | -5 |
| -3.6 | Round 3 | MONACO | 25 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +1 |
| -4.0 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 24 | 3NT | ♠6 | -1 | -4 |
| -4.4 | Round 4 | SINSEN BK | 4 | 3♠ | ♣A | +1 | -14 |
| -5.9 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 13 | 3♣ | ♠K | = | -15 |
| -7.1 | Round 8 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 16 | 4♣ | ♠7 | = | -11 |
| -7.3 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 28 | 6♠ | ♣A | -1 | -14 |
| -10.5 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 29 | 6♦ | ♠8 | +1 | +0 |