EVENSTAD Stian · BAANNBRIDGE
vs par split: bidding +0.23 · play -0.11
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.10/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.79/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.5% #66 of 466 · declarer play 66.7% #317 of 466 · defence 84.2% #324 of 466
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (5) | 87.5% (16) |
| Declarer play | 87.5% (8) | 42.9% (7) |
| Defence | 83.3% (12) | 84.6% (26) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 87.5% (8) · ♥ 100.0% (6) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +0.09 (23) · a suit +0.13 (47)
vs par by level: part-score -1.08 (25) · game +0.26 (39) · slam +4.17 (6)
By role: declaring +1.60/bd (-2.06 vs par · 32) · defending -0.07/bd (+1.95 vs par · 38)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.25/bd (+0.50 vs par · 36) · not vulnerable +0.10/bd (-0.29 vs par · 34)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | E.Larsen | J.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki | Closed | 10 | +14.9 | +1.49 | -0.70 |
| Round 3 | E.Larsen | D.Sargent – J.Aars | Open | 10 | +12.6 | +1.26 | +1.10 |
| Round 4 | E.Larsen | E.Erichsen – E.Skjetne | Closed | 10 | -23.7 | -2.37 | -2.10 |
| Round 6 | E.Larsen | A.Dubinin – A.Gromov | Open | 10 | +15.4 | +1.54 | +4.00 |
| Round 7 | E.Larsen | E.Ginossar – O.Reshef | Closed | 10 | -1.0 | -0.10 | -1.90 |
| Round 8 | E.Larsen | A.Fuglestad – M.Harding | Closed | 10 | +3.9 | +0.39 | -1.00 |
| Round 10 | E.Larsen | L.Helgesen – T.Gjoes | Open | 10 | +26.3 | +2.63 | +1.40 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +15.9 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 29 | 7♦ | ♠8 | = | +12 |
| +14.1 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 4 | 6♠ | ♦8 | = | +13 |
| +10.2 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 28 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | +10 |
| +8.9 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 18 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | +10 |
| +8.2 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 2 | 6♣ | ♠A | -1 | +10 |
| +8.1 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 22 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | +6 |
| +8.0 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 22 | 2NT | ♦Q | -1 | +6 |
| +7.8 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 30 | 4♥ | ♦A | = | +8 |
| +7.0 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 8 | 5♠ | ♣Q | = | -8 |
| +5.9 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 4 | 2♥ | ♦6 | -1 | +5 |
| +5.9 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 8 | 3NT | ♥Q | -2 | +11 |
| +5.5 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 2 | 1NT | ♥5 | +1 | +1 |
| +4.4 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 20 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -2 | +2 |
| +4.2 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 3 | 6NT | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| +4.0 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 13 | 4♥ | ♦6 | = | -13 |
| +3.6 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 8 | 2♥ | ♣Q | = | +1 |
| +3.0 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 7 | 4NT | ♥2 | +1 | -13 |
| +2.8 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 9 | 1NTx | ♣A | -2 | -7 |
| +2.7 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 15 | 2NT | ♠Q | = | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 26 | 3♥ | ♥10 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 11 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -1 | +10 |
| +2.1 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 7 | 6NT | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 1 | 1♠ | ♥A | -3 | +1 |
| +1.9 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 25 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| +1.9 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 10 | 3♣ | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 4 | 2♠ | ♠8 | -2 | +2 |
| +1.2 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 5 | 4♠ | ♦A | +2 | +11 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 30 | 3♣ | ♦5 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.8 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 5 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 29 | 3NT | ♠J | = | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 1 | 3♦ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| +0.1 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 27 | 1NT | ♣10 | = | -1 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 6 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 1 | 4♠ | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 5 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +2 | +13 |
| -0.3 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 23 | 3♦ | ♥K | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 6 | 4♦ | ♣Q | = | -7 |
| -0.6 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 14 | 2♣ | ♣3 | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 6 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | -11 |
| -0.7 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 3 | 3NT | ♦2 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 9 | 4♠ | ♣6 | -2 | -5 |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 2 | 4♥ | ♣7 | = | +3 |
| -0.8 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 24 | 2NT | ♦2 | +1 | -2 |
| -0.8 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 3 | 4♥ | ♦J | +1 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 1 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | +1 |
| -1.0 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 8 | 3♣ | ♣10 | -1 | -9 |
| -1.0 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 27 | 3♣ | ♥J | = | +1 |
| -1.1 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 2 | 3NT | ♥8 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 26 | 3NT | ♦J | +3 | +13 |
| -1.3 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 21 | 4♥ | ♠K | +1 | -1 |
| -1.4 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 6 | 4♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 12 | 2♠ | ♣4 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.8 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 5 | 2♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 3 | 5♣ | ♦K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.3 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 7 | 1NT | ♠J | +1 | -11 |
| -2.6 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 21 | 3♠ | ♦Q | -1 | -6 |
| -2.6 | Round 10 | TEAM SARPSBORG | 9 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 19 | 3NT | ♠6 | = | +1 |
| -3.0 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 28 | 4♠ | ♠2 | +2 | +11 |
| -3.6 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 25 | 3NT | ♣2 | = | +1 |
| -3.8 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 7 | 3NT | ♥10 | -1 | -12 |
| -4.1 | Round 6 | MATCHPOINTNYC | 23 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -4.9 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 10 | 3♣ | ♠3 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 16 | 4♥ | ♣J | -1 | -10 |
| -5.8 | Round 1 | MAZURKIEWICZ | 10 | 3♠ | ♥A | = | -7 |
| -6.1 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 9 | 4♠ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -6.8 | Round 4 | ERICHSEN | 4 | 5♣ | ♠A | +1 | +5 |
| -7.5 | Round 8 | SCANDIC HOLMENKOLLEN | 17 | 6♣ | ♥A | -1 | -10 |
| -8.5 | Round 7 | BAREKET | 10 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | -10 |
| -9.9 | Round 3 | ABERDEEN ANGUS | 24 | 5♣x | ♠A | = | -10 |