Round 25 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 25 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARIE | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | NONSTOP | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SOLHEIM | KURTS ANGELS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | LES MISERABLES | TAKK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SANBORN | GRAIZER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ALZADA | TRONDERMIX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | WITO | ROSSARD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | GAMMA GRAFISK | MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TEAM ATLANTIC | MAHAFFEY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ANITAS SANS | DARLING | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SILVERFOX | HOFFEMAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | YABBIES | TOMFOOLERY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | PUNCH | KIBE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PASSO DOUBLE | VIDIGAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | TOGRAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | MELBOURNE 1 | THE PATRIOTS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MALUISH | TUPPEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | OPTIMISTS | VI E KLAR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | LEGEANKA | ROSENTHAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | WARD PLATT | MOSTINGAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | BERGEN AK | ZEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | BOHNSACK | MELWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | PANDORA | GOLD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | MINA | CAYNE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | BADGER | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | NI LLIV | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | SJODAL | MIKLAGARD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 25↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 25 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R25 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | 64.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 2 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 62.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 62.40 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 4 | GRAIZER | 61.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 5 | KIBE | 60.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 6 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 60.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 7 | ROSENTHAL | 59.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 8 | ALZADA | 58.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 9 | BADGER | 56.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 9 | SJODAL | 56.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 9 | TAKK | 56.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 12 | SOLHEIM | 55.60 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 13 | MAHAFFEY | 55.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 14 | SILVERFOX | 54.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 14 | YABBIES | 54.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 16 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 54.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 17 | PUNCH | 53.60 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 18 | BOHNSACK | 53.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 18 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 53.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 18 | ROSSARD | 53.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 21 | MARIE | 53.20 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 22 | MIKLAGARD | 53.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 23 | DARLING | 52.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 24 | KURTS ANGELS | 52.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 24 | TOMFOOLERY | 52.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 26 | GOLD | 51.60 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 27 | VIDIGAL | 51.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 28 | CAYNE | 50.80 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 28 | MELWOOD | 50.80 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 30 | PASSO DOUBLE | 50.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 30 | TRONDERMIX | 50.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 30 | TUPPEN | 50.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 30 | WARD PLATT | 50.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 34 | MALUISH | 49.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 34 | WITO | 49.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 36 | BERGEN AK | 49.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 37 | ANITAS SANS | 47.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 37 | OPTIMISTS | 47.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 39 | ZEN | 47.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 40 | NONSTOP | 45.40 | 2.40 | 25 |
| 41 | MINA | 44.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 42 | MELBOURNE 1 | 44.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 43 | MIXED | 43.80 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 44 | TOGRAM | 42.40 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 45 | LES MISERABLES | 42.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 45 | NI LLIV | 42.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 47 | THE PATRIOTS | 40.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 48 | HOFFEMAN | 40.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 49 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 39.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 50 | LEGEANKA | 38.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 51 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 37.20 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 31.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 28.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 25 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R25 | BAM% |
|---|
MARIE vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 3 : 1 VP (match 24057) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 19 | 4♣ | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 57% | 3♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 5♣x | W | ♥8 | -1 | 200 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 84% | ||||
| 20 | 5♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONSTOP vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 24058)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONSTOP | BYE | |
| 19 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 20 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 20 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SOLHEIM vs KURTS ANGELS 4 : 0 VP (match 24059) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SOLHEIM | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 86% | 3♠x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 5♣ | W | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LES MISERABLES vs TAKK 0 : 4 VP (match 24060) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LES MISERABLES | TAKK | |
| 19 | 4♣ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 74% | 4♦ | W | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 5♥x | S | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 99% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 5♥x | S | -3 | 800 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANBORN vs GRAIZER 4 : 0 VP (match 24061) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANBORN | GRAIZER | |
| 19 | 3♠ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 6♣ | W | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 67% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALZADA vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 24062) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALZADA | TRONDERMIX | |
| 19 | 3♠ | N | ♥A | = | 140 | 66% | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -4 | 400 | 84% | 4♠x | E | ♣4 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 24063) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | ROSSARD | |
| 19 | 4♦x | W | ♠Q | -3 | 800 | 100% | 3♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 61% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 24064) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | MIXED | |
| 19 | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 94% | 3♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 5♣ | W | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 84% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs MAHAFFEY 4 : 0 VP (match 24065) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | MAHAFFEY | |
| 19 | 3♦ | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 5♣ | W | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs DARLING 2 : 2 VP (match 24066) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | DARLING | |
| 19 | 3♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 61% | 4♣ | E | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs HOFFEMAN 3 : 1 VP (match 24067) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | HOFFEMAN | |
| 19 | 4♣ | E | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2NT | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 3♠ | E | ♦J | -3 | 300 | 66% | 4♠x | E | ♦J | -1 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| 20 | 3♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs TOMFOOLERY 0 : 4 VP (match 24068) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 19 | 3♣ | E | ♣Q | +1 | 130 | 74% | 2♠ | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♠ | E | ♣2 | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs KIBE 0 : 4 VP (match 24069) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | KIBE | |
| 19 | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2NT | E | ♥8 | -4 | 400 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 6♣ | W | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -4 | 400 | 93% | ||||
| 20 | 6♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs VIDIGAL 2 : 2 VP (match 24070) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | VIDIGAL | |
| 19 | 2NT | E | ♥6 | = | 120 | 69% | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3♠ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 84% | ||||
| 20 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs TOGRAM 3 : 1 VP (match 24071) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | TOGRAM | |
| 19 | 3♠x | N | ♥K | -2 | 300 | 84% | 3NT | E | ♥8 | = | 600 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 5♥x | N | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 91% | 5♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-1.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 100% | ||||
| 20 | 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs THE PATRIOTS 1 : 3 VP (match 24072) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | THE PATRIOTS | |
| 19 | 3NT | E | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 74% | 3NT | E | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 5♥x | N | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 91% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3NT | E | -2 | 200 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -2 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MALUISH vs TUPPEN 4 : 0 VP (match 24073) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MALUISH | TUPPEN | |
| 19 | 5♦ | E | ♣2 | -4 | 400 | 93% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 5♣ | E | ♣2 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 5♣ | W | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 5♦ | E | -4 | 400 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 61% | ||||
| 20 | 5♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs VI E KLAR 4 : 0 VP (match 24074) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | VI E KLAR | |
| 19 | 2♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 66% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -4 | 400 | 84% | 5♣ | W | ♠8 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs ROSENTHAL 2 : 2 VP (match 24075) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | ROSENTHAL | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 86% | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs MOSTINGAN 3 : 1 VP (match 24076) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | MOSTINGAN | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 74% | 3♣ | E | ♣Q | +1 | 130 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs ZEN 2 : 2 VP (match 24077) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | ZEN | |
| 19 | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 94% | 4♠x | S | ♥5 | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 55% | 5♥x | S | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 84% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs MELWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 24078) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | MELWOOD | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 86% | 3♦x | W | ♠Q | -2 | 500 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3NT | E | ♦J | -3 | 300 | 66% | 5♥x | S | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| 20 | 3NT | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | S | -3 | 800 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs GOLD 1 : 3 VP (match 24079) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | GOLD | |
| 19 | 3♦ | E | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 5♣ | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs CAYNE 0 : 4 VP (match 24080) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | CAYNE | |
| 19 | 4♣ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 74% | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 24081) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠J | -3 | 300 | 86% | 3♠xx | N | ♥K | = | 760 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3♥x | S | ♠K | = | 730 | 98% | 5♣ | W | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠xx | N | = | 760 | 98% | ||||
| 20 | 3♥x | S | = | 730 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs NI LLIV 4 : 0 VP (match 24082) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | NI LLIV | |
| 19 | 3♠ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♣Q | +1 | 130 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 5♦ | E | ♣5 | -6 | 600 | 96% | 4♥x | S | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 74% | ||||
| 20 | 5♦ | E | -6 | 600 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs MIKLAGARD 2 : 2 VP (match 24083) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | MIKLAGARD | |
| 19 | 4♦ | W | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠x | E | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 55% | 5♣x | W | ♠9 | -2 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 4♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|