Round 22 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 22 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAKK | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | KURTS ANGELS | SANBORN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BYE | ALZADA | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 4 | MARIE | WITO | 3 | 1 | 3.20 | 1.20 | protocol → |
| 5 | GAMMA GRAFISK | NONSTOP | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | TEAM ATLANTIC | SOLHEIM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | ANITAS SANS | LES MISERABLES | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | HOFFEMAN | GRAIZER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | YABBIES | TRONDERMIX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PUNCH | ROSSARD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | MIXED | VIDIGAL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | MAHAFFEY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | THE PATRIOTS | DARLING | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | SILVERFOX | TUPPEN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | OPTIMISTS | TOMFOOLERY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | KIBE | LEGEANKA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | PASSO DOUBLE | MOSTINGAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | ZEN | TOGRAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BOHNSACK | MELBOURNE 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | MALUISH | PANDORA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | VI E KLAR | MINA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | BEIJING TRINERGY | ROSENTHAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | WARD PLATT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | MIKLAGARD | BERGEN AK | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | MELWOOD | SJODAL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | NI LLIV | GOLD | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | CAYNE | BADGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 22↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 22 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R22 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | 57.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 55.40 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 3 | GRAIZER | 55.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 4 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 54.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 5 | KIBE | 53.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 5 | MAHAFFEY | 53.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 7 | ROSENTHAL | 53.20 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 8 | ALZADA | 52.40 | 2.40 | 22 |
| 8 | SJODAL | 52.40 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 10 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 52.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 11 | KURTS ANGELS | 50.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 12 | PUNCH | 49.60 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 13 | BADGER | 49.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 13 | YABBIES | 49.40 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 15 | TAKK | 48.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 16 | SILVERFOX | 47.40 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 17 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 47.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 17 | MIKLAGARD | 47.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 19 | ROSSARD | 46.40 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 19 | VIDIGAL | 46.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 21 | DARLING | 46.20 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 22 | GOLD | 45.60 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 22 | SOLHEIM | 45.60 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 24 | BOHNSACK | 45.40 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 25 | MARIE | 45.20 | 3.20 | 22 |
| 26 | CAYNE | 44.80 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 26 | MELWOOD | 44.80 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 28 | WITO | 44.40 | 1.20 | 22 |
| 29 | PASSO DOUBLE | 44.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 29 | TRONDERMIX | 44.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 29 | TUPPEN | 44.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 29 | WARD PLATT | 44.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 33 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 43.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 34 | TOMFOOLERY | 43.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 34 | ZEN | 43.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 36 | MALUISH | 42.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 37 | BERGEN AK | 42.20 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 38 | MINA | 41.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 39 | LES MISERABLES | 41.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 40 | ANITAS SANS | 40.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 41 | MELBOURNE 1 | 40.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 42 | NONSTOP | 39.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 43 | MIXED | 38.80 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 44 | TOGRAM | 38.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 45 | OPTIMISTS | 37.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 46 | NI LLIV | 37.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 47 | HOFFEMAN | 35.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 48 | THE PATRIOTS | 34.40 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 49 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 33.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 50 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 30.80 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 51 | LEGEANKA | 29.20 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 27.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 26.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 22 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R22 | BAM% |
|---|
TAKK vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23976) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 13 | 2♥ | S | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 98% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 57% | 1NT | W | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KURTS ANGELS vs SANBORN 4 : 0 VP (match 23977) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KURTS ANGELS | SANBORN | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | ♥6 | = | 110 | 86% | 1NT | E | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 93% | ||||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs ALZADA 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23978)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | ALZADA | |
| 13 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 14 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 14 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARIE vs WITO 3.2 : 1.2 VP (match 23979) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | WITO | |
| 13 | 3♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +4 | 230 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 14 | Adj. | — | 120 | 1NT | E | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +4 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | Adj. | 120 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs NONSTOP 4 : 0 VP (match 23980) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | NONSTOP | |
| 13 | 3♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2♠ | E | ♥2 | +4 | 230 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2♠ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +4 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs SOLHEIM 0 : 4 VP (match 23981) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | SOLHEIM | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2♠ | W | ♦A | +3 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs LES MISERABLES 4 : 0 VP (match 23982) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | LES MISERABLES | |
| 13 | 4♠ | W | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | ♥2 | = | 110 | 86% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | ||||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs GRAIZER 2 : 2 VP (match 23983) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | GRAIZER | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +3 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1♦ | W | ♣Q | +2 | 110 | 52% | 1NT | W | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| 14 | 1♦ | W | +2 | 110 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs TRONDERMIX 3 : 1 VP (match 23984) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | TRONDERMIX | |
| 13 | 2♥ | N | ♦7 | = | 110 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1NT | W | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs ROSSARD 3 : 1 VP (match 23985) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | ROSSARD | |
| 13 | 3♠ | W | ♦K | +3 | 230 | 74% | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +4 | 230 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 3♠ | S | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♠ | W | +3 | 230 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | +4 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIXED vs VIDIGAL 0 : 4 VP (match 23986) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIXED | VIDIGAL | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +3 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +3 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs MAHAFFEY 2 : 2 VP (match 23987) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | MAHAFFEY | |
| 13 | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +4 | 230 | 74% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | E | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2♠ | S | ♣6 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♠ | E | +4 | 230 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs DARLING 0 : 4 VP (match 23988) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | DARLING | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | +2 | 680 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2♠ | S | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs TUPPEN 0 : 4 VP (match 23989) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | TUPPEN | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦9 | +2 | 680 | 93% | 3♠ | E | ♦J | +3 | 230 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 1NT | W | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | +3 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23990) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 13 | 3♠ | E | ♦5 | +2 | 200 | 90% | 3♠ | E | ♣2 | +3 | 230 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1N | W | ♣6 | = | 90 | 57% | 2♠ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 140 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | +3 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | 1N | W | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs LEGEANKA 2 : 2 VP (match 23991) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | LEGEANKA | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 57% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs MOSTINGAN 3 : 1 VP (match 23992) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | MOSTINGAN | |
| 13 | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +4 | 230 | 74% | 3♠ | E | ♦J | +3 | 230 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1NT | E | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♠ | E | +4 | 230 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | +3 | 230 | 74% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs TOGRAM 2 : 2 VP (match 23993) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | TOGRAM | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | ♥6 | = | 110 | 86% | 2♠ | S | ♥6 | = | 110 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs MELBOURNE 1 0 : 4 VP (match 23994) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | MELBOURNE 1 | |
| 13 | 2♥ | N | ♠J | -3 | 300 | 61% | 2♠ | W | ♦A | +5 | 260 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | E | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 68% | 1NT | E | ♠6 | = | 90 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 2♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +5 | 260 | 63% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MALUISH vs PANDORA 2 : 2 VP (match 23995) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MALUISH | PANDORA | |
| 13 | 3♥x | N | ♦2 | -2 | 500 | 59% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | E | ♣2 | +1 | 120 | 68% | 3♦ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VI E KLAR vs MINA 0 : 4 VP (match 23996) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VI E KLAR | MINA | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2NTx | W | ♥A | = | 490 | 100% | 2♠ | S | ♥3 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.9 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 2NTx | W | = | 490 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs ROSENTHAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23997) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | ROSENTHAL | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 140 | 96% | 2♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs WARD PLATT 2 : 2 VP (match 23998) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | WARD PLATT | |
| 13 | 3♠ | W | ♦J | +3 | 230 | 74% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2♠ | S | ♥2 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3♠ | W | +3 | 230 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs BERGEN AK 1 : 3 VP (match 23999) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | BERGEN AK | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♦2 | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2NT | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELWOOD vs SJODAL 3 : 1 VP (match 24000) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELWOOD | SJODAL | |
| 13 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | 3♠ | S | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs GOLD 0 : 4 VP (match 24001) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | GOLD | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2NTx | W | ♠2 | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2NTx | W | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs BADGER 0 : 4 VP (match 24002) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | BADGER | |
| 13 | 4♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 64% | 3♠ | E | ♦J | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 1NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2♠ | S | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| 14 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|