Skip to content

🌐 All championships 🏠 Categories 🔍 Players ▲ Top

Tables

← Cumulative standings Round 2 results & standings results standings Round 2 board records

Match protocols

1. MINA – INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2. PANDORA – BEIJING TRINERGY 3. BOHNSACK – BRIDGE OF KING F1 4. ZEN – MIKLAGARD 5. SJODAL – MOSTINGAN 6. NI LLIV – LEGEANKA 7. BADGER – OPTIMISTS 8. CAYNE – TUPPEN 9. GOLD – THE PATRIOTS 10. MELWOOD – CHINA GEELY AUTO 11. VIDIGAL – BERGEN AK 12. WARD PLATT – PUNCH 13. ROSENTHAL – YABBIES 14. HOFFEMAN – VI E KLAR 15. MALUISH – ANITAS SANS 16. TEAM ATLANTIC – MELBOURNE 1 17. GAMMA GRAFISK – TOGRAM 18. PASSO DOUBLE – WITO 19. KIBE – ALZADA 20. SANBORN – TOMFOOLERY 21. TAKK – SILVERFOX 22. DARLING – KURTS ANGELS 23. MAHAFFEY – BYE 24. MIXED – MARIE 25. NONSTOP – ROSSARD 26. TRONDERMIX – SOLHEIM 27. LES MISERABLES – GRAIZER

Rounds

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17 Round 18 Round 19 Round 20 Round 21 Round 22 Round 23 Round 24 Round 25

Round 2 — M-OPEN BAM

27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records

Round 2 results↑ top

Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.

Table	Home team	Visiting team	BAM (home)	BAM (visit)	VP (home)	VP (visit)
1	MINA	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
2	PANDORA	BEIJING TRINERGY	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
3	BOHNSACK	BRIDGE OF KING F1	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
4	ZEN	MIKLAGARD	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
5	SJODAL	MOSTINGAN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
6	NI LLIV	LEGEANKA	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
7	BADGER	OPTIMISTS	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
8	CAYNE	TUPPEN	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
9	GOLD	THE PATRIOTS	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
10	MELWOOD	CHINA GEELY AUTO	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
11	VIDIGAL	BERGEN AK	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
12	WARD PLATT	PUNCH	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
13	ROSENTHAL	YABBIES	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
14	HOFFEMAN	VI E KLAR	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
15	MALUISH	ANITAS SANS	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
16	TEAM ATLANTIC	MELBOURNE 1	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
17	GAMMA GRAFISK	TOGRAM	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
18	PASSO DOUBLE	WITO	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
19	KIBE	ALZADA	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
20	SANBORN	TOMFOOLERY	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
21	TAKK	SILVERFOX	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
22	DARLING	KURTS ANGELS	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
23	MAHAFFEY	BYE	0	0	2.40	0.00	protocol →
24	MIXED	MARIE	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
25	NONSTOP	ROSSARD	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
26	TRONDERMIX	SOLHEIM	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
27	LES MISERABLES	GRAIZER	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →

Standings after round 2↑ top

Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players

Place	Team	Pts	R2	Pld
1	MIKLAGARD	8.00	4.00	2
2	GOLD	7.00	4.00	2
2	TEAM ATLANTIC	7.00	3.00	2
4	BEIJING TRINERGY	6.00	3.00	2
4	GRAIZER	6.00	4.00	2
4	MALUISH	6.00	4.00	2
4	NI LLIV	6.00	2.00	2
4	VI E KLAR	6.00	4.00	2
9	BADGER	5.00	2.00	2
9	BRIDGE OF KING F1	5.00	2.00	2
9	DARLING	5.00	4.00	2
9	KIBE	5.00	3.00	2
9	MIXED	5.00	4.00	2
9	SANBORN	5.00	2.00	2
9	SILVERFOX	5.00	2.00	2
9	SJODAL	5.00	3.00	2
9	SOLHEIM	5.00	3.00	2
9	TRONDERMIX	5.00	1.00	2
9	WARD PLATT	5.00	2.00	2
9	WITO	5.00	2.00	2
9	YABBIES	5.00	3.00	2
22	CAYNE	4.80	2.00	2
23	MAHAFFEY	4.40	2.40	2
23	ROSSARD	4.40	2.00	2
25	BERGEN AK	4.00	3.00	2
25	BOHNSACK	4.00	2.00	2
25	CHINA GEELY AUTO	4.00	3.00	2
25	GAMMA GRAFISK	4.00	2.00	2
25	MELWOOD	4.00	1.00	2
25	NONSTOP	4.00	2.00	2
25	PUNCH	4.00	2.00	2
25	TAKK	4.00	2.00	2
25	TOGRAM	4.00	2.00	2
25	VIDIGAL	4.00	1.00	2
35	LEGEANKA	3.20	2.00	2
36	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	3.00	2.00	2
36	KURTS ANGELS	3.00	0.00	2
36	MELBOURNE 1	3.00	1.00	2
36	MINA	3.00	2.00	2
36	OPTIMISTS	3.00	2.00	2
36	THE PATRIOTS	3.00	0.00	2
36	TOMFOOLERY	3.00	2.00	2
36	TUPPEN	3.00	2.00	2
44	ALZADA	2.00	1.00	2
44	ANITAS SANS	2.00	0.00	2
44	HOFFEMAN	2.00	0.00	2
44	LES MISERABLES	2.00	0.00	2
44	MOSTINGAN	2.00	1.00	2
44	PASSO DOUBLE	2.00	2.00	2
44	ROSENTHAL	2.00	1.00	2
51	PANDORA	1.00	1.00	2
52	MARIE	0.00	0.00	2
52	ZEN	0.00	0.00	2

Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.

Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	R2	BAM%

MINA vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2 : 2 VP (match 23436) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MINA	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN
3	3♦	W	♠4	+1		130	62%	4♥	E	♠3	-1	100		79%		2
4	2♦	W	♠J	+4		170	96%	3NT	E	♥7	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.7							NS+0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%		2
3	4♥	E	-1	100		79%		2
4	2♦	W	+4		170	96%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.7	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PANDORA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 1 : 3 VP (match 23437) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PANDORA	BEIJING TRINERGY
3	3♥	E	♣2	+1		170	80%	4♦	W	♣8	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	♣4	+3		690	63%	5NT	E	♣6	+1		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-0.5	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♥	E	+1		170	80%		2
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	5NT	E	+1		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BOHNSACK vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 2 : 2 VP (match 23438) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BOHNSACK	BRIDGE OF KING F1
3	4♥	E	♠5	+1		650	98%	4♦	W	♦5	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	W	♠J	+1		630	94%	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.1							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♥	E	+1		650	98%		2
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	W	+1		630	94%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.1	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ZEN vs MIKLAGARD 0 : 4 VP (match 23439) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ZEN	MIKLAGARD
3	3♦	W	♠4	+1		130	62%	4♣x	S	♦A	-1		100	63%		2
4	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.9	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%		2
3	4♣x	S	-1		100	63%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SJODAL vs MOSTINGAN 3 : 1 VP (match 23440) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SJODAL	MOSTINGAN
3	3NT	E	♦2	-2	200		94%	3♦	W	♦8	=		110	58%	2
4	3NT	E	♦2	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣4	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS-0.1	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3NT	E	-2	200		94%	2
3	3♦	W	=		110	58%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.1	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NI LLIV vs LEGEANKA 2 : 2 VP (match 23441) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NI LLIV	LEGEANKA
3	4♠x	S	♥9	-2		300	84%	4♥	E	♠5	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	3NT	W	♠J	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.0							NS+0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♠x	S	-2		300	84%		2
3	4♥	E	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BADGER vs OPTIMISTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23442) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BADGER	OPTIMISTS
3	3♦	W	♦5	+1		130	62%	3♦	W	♠7	+1		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	W	♣4	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣4	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%	1	1
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CAYNE vs TUPPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 23443) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CAYNE	TUPPEN
3	4♥	E	♠5	-1	100		79%	4♦	W	♣8	-1	100		79%	1	1
4	3NT	E	♥7	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♥8	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.3							NS+0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♥	E	-1	100		79%	1	1
3	4♦	W	-1	100		79%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

GOLD vs THE PATRIOTS 4 : 0 VP (match 23444) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	GOLD	THE PATRIOTS
3	4♣	S	♦K	-2		100	63%	3NT	E	♠3	+1		630	95%	2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	3NT	E	♠6	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-1.2	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♣	S	-2		100	63%	2
3	3NT	E	+1		630	95%	2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.2	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELWOOD vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23445) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELWOOD	CHINA GEELY AUTO
3	4♦	W	♣8	=		130	62%	4♦	W	♣8	=		130	62%	1	1
4	6♦	W	♣A	=		1370	99%	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.2							NS-0.5	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%	1	1
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%	1	1
4	6♦	W	=		1370	99%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.2	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

VIDIGAL vs BERGEN AK 1 : 3 VP (match 23446) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	VIDIGAL	BERGEN AK
3	4♠x	N	♦6	-2		300	84%	4♦	W	♣7	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	♣3	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♠6	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-0.5	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♠x	N	-2		300	84%		2
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

WARD PLATT vs PUNCH 2 : 2 VP (match 23447) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	WARD PLATT	PUNCH
3	4♦	W	♣K	=		130	62%	4♦	W	♠2	=		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣J	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%	1	1
3	4♦	W	=		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSENTHAL vs YABBIES 1 : 3 VP (match 23448) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSENTHAL	YABBIES
3	3♦	W	♣8	+1		130	62%	4♠	S	♦A	-2		100	63%		2
4	3NT	W	♠10	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣3	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS0.0	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%		2
3	4♠	S	-2		100	63%		2
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

HOFFEMAN vs VI E KLAR 0 : 4 VP (match 23449) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	HOFFEMAN	VI E KLAR
3	3♦	E	♣8	+1		130	62%	4♥	W	♣8	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	♣3	+3		690	63%	3NT	W	♣6	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+1.2	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	E	+1		130	62%		2
3	4♥	W	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%		2
4	3NT	W	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MALUISH vs ANITAS SANS 4 : 0 VP (match 23450) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MALUISH	ANITAS SANS
3	2♠	S	♣2	=	110		88%	4♥	W	♣8	-1	100		79%	2
4	6NT	E	♣2	-1	100		99%	3NT	W	♠J	+2		660	82%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.7							NS+1.2	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	2♠	S	=	110		88%	2
3	4♥	W	-1	100		79%	2
4	6NT	E	-1	100		99%	2
4	3NT	W	+2		660	82%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.7	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TEAM ATLANTIC vs MELBOURNE 1 3 : 1 VP (match 23451) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TEAM ATLANTIC	MELBOURNE 1
3	3♠	S	♦A	=	140		90%	3♠	N	♦A	-1		50	69%	2
4	3NT	W	♠J	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♠J	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.5							NS+0.1	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♠	S	=	140		90%	2
3	3♠	N	-1		50	69%	2
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.5	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.1	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

GAMMA GRAFISK vs TOGRAM 2 : 2 VP (match 23452) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	GAMMA GRAFISK	TOGRAM
3	3♦	W	♠4	=		110	58%	4♥	E	♦10	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	6♦	W	♠J	=		1370	99%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.8							NS-0.4	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	=		110	58%		2
3	4♥	E	-1	100		79%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	6♦	W	=		1370	99%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.8	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.4	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PASSO DOUBLE vs WITO 2 : 2 VP (match 23453) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PASSO DOUBLE	WITO
3	4♥	E	♠3	=		620	91%	3♦	W	♠4	+1		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	3NT	W	♠J	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.2							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♥	E	=		620	91%		2
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.2	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

KIBE vs ALZADA 3 : 1 VP (match 23454) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	KIBE	ALZADA
3	4♠x	N	♦4	-2		300	84%	4♥	W	♠4	=		620	91%	2
4	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-1.1	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♠x	N	-2		300	84%	2
3	4♥	W	=		620	91%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.1	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SANBORN vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23455) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SANBORN	TOMFOOLERY
3	3♠	S	♦A	-1		50	69%	3♠x	S	♦A	+1	630		100%		2
4	3NT	E	♥7	+2		660	82%	3NT	E	♥7	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.0							NS+0.7	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♠	S	-1		50	69%		2
3	3♠x	S	+1	630		100%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.7	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TAKK vs SILVERFOX 2 : 2 VP (match 23456) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TAKK	SILVERFOX
3	3♠x	S	♦A	=	530		98%	4♠x	S	♦K	-3		500	88%	2
4	3NT	E	♣4	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣6	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.7							NS-0.1	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♠x	S	=	530		98%	2
3	4♠x	S	-3		500	88%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%		2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.7	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.1	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

DARLING vs KURTS ANGELS 4 : 0 VP (match 23457) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	DARLING	KURTS ANGELS
3	4♥	E	♠6	-3	300		96%	3♠	S	♦A	+1	170		92%	2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	3NT	E	♠J	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.6							NS+0.6	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♥	E	-3	300		96%	2
3	3♠	S	+1	170		92%	2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.6	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MAHAFFEY vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23458)↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MAHAFFEY	BYE
3	–		—					–		—
4	–		—					–		—
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS0.0	0	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	–
3	–
4	–
4	–
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	0	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	0	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIXED vs MARIE 4 : 0 VP (match 23459) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIXED	MARIE
3	4♥	E	♠3	-1	100		79%	3♦	W	♣8	+1		130	62%	2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+2		660	82%	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.2							NS-0.5	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	4♥	E	-1	100		79%	2
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%	2
4	3NT	E	+2		660	82%	2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.2	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NONSTOP vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 23460) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NONSTOP	ROSSARD
3	3♦	W	♠2	+1		130	62%	3♦	W	♣8	+1		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	E	♣4	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣6	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%	1	1
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TRONDERMIX vs SOLHEIM 1 : 3 VP (match 23461) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TRONDERMIX	SOLHEIM
3	3NT	E	♥K	+1		630	95%	3♠	N	♦4	-1		50	69%		2
4	3NT	W	♦5	+3		690	63%	3NT	E	♣8	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.2							NS+0.1	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	3NT	E	+1		630	95%		2
3	3♠	N	-1		50	69%		2
4	3NT	W	+3		690	63%	1	1
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.2	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.1	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

LES MISERABLES vs GRAIZER 0 : 4 VP (match 23462) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	LES MISERABLES	GRAIZER
3	5♣x	S	♦K	-4		800	100%	3♦	W	♣8	+1		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	♠6	+3		690	63%	5♦	W	♠J	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.3							NS+0.7	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
3	5♣x	S	-4		800	100%		2
3	3♦	W	+1		130	62%		2
4	3NT	E	+3		690	63%		2
4	5♦	W	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.3	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.7	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg