Round 9 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | GOSSCHALK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | ACDC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | TARV | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | AJ DIAMENT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | MATTEUCCI | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | FORNACIARI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | SEWIL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | GUERRIERO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | PUNCH | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | WOMBATS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | VITA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | COMPITALIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | KIWIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | VICOZ | 1 | 3 | 1.20 | 3.20 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | LUND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | MAHAFFEY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | CALANDRA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | BADGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | DARLING | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | GODZILLA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | RIDOLFO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | PBC GRAZ | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | MAX | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | LE BOMASC | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | DJAWS TRIT | 3 | 1 | 2.80 | 1.20 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | VINCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | CANNAVALE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | CZECH REPUBLIC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | SAGIVS TIGERS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | ENZ | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | NATAF | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | GILLIS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | SVAERKE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | ORG REIGNWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | INFERNO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIPIREDA | 30.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 2 | MAIMUZZINI | 26.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 2 | TARV | 26.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 4 | CANNAVALE | 25.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 4 | ISOARD | 25.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 4 | PBC GRAZ | 25.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 7 | LE BOMASC | 24.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 8 | BADGER | 23.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 8 | CREMIN | 23.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 8 | SWISSALERT | 23.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 8 | WOMBATS | 23.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 12 | BINKIE | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 12 | MAHAFFEY | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 12 | MAX | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 15 | VICOZ | 21.20 | 3.20 | 9 |
| 16 | AJ DIAMENT | 21.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 16 | BELGIUM | 21.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 16 | GILLIS | 21.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 16 | PENFOLD | 21.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 20 | CORALINE | 20.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | FORNACIARI | 20.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | MAJOR | 20.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 20 | NATAF | 20.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 20 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 20.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | SILBERSEE | 20.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 20 | VINCI | 20.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 27 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 19.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 28 | ACDC | 19.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 28 | AJ DIAMENT II | 19.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 28 | ALEX | 19.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 28 | CALANDRA | 19.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 28 | FAILLA | 19.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 28 | MATTEUCCI | 19.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 28 | SEWIL | 19.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 35 | CFSC | 18.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 35 | COMPITALIA | 18.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 35 | DARLING | 18.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 35 | DE BOTTON | 18.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 35 | MCGUIRE | 18.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 35 | STOPPA | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 41 | DYRKORN | 17.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 41 | GODZILLA | 17.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 41 | KIBE | 17.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 44 | MIAMI HEAT | 16.80 | 2.80 | 9 |
| 45 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 45 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 16.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 45 | GOSSCHALK | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 45 | GUERRIERO | 16.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 45 | INFERNO | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 45 | SVAERKE | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 45 | VITA | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 45 | YALMAN | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 53 | KANDEMIR | 15.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 53 | VALIO | 15.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 55 | FINNED | 14.20 | 1.20 | 9 |
| 56 | ENZ | 14.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 56 | KIWIS | 14.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 56 | LOLA | 14.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 56 | RAFFI | 14.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 56 | RIDOLFO | 14.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 61 | DJAWS TRIT | 13.20 | 1.20 | 9 |
| 61 | HELNESS | 13.20 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 63 | ROBERTSON | 13.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 63 | VYTAS | 13.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 65 | JOSE | 12.66 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 66 | LUND | 12.34 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 67 | GINO | 12.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 67 | PUNCH | 12.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 69 | FLAVIA | 11.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 69 | TACCETTI | 11.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 71 | JIANG | 9.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 71 | LEDGER | 9.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs GOSSCHALK 4 : 0 VP (match 45650) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | GOSSCHALK | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 110 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♥6 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 6♣x | S | ♦5 | -4 | 1100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | S | -4 | 1100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs ACDC 2 : 2 VP (match 45651) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | ACDC | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 1NT | N | ♦5 | +2 | 150 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♦x | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 5♣x | S | ♠4 | -2 | 500 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 87% | ||||
| 28 | 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs TARV 0 : 4 VP (match 45652) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | TARV | |
| 27 | 2NT | N | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2♥ | N | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♥ | N | ♣8 | -3 | 300 | 71% | 5♦x | E | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | ||||
| 28 | 3♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs AJ DIAMENT 4 : 0 VP (match 45653) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 90% | 1NT | N | ♦4 | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♣ | S | ♠4 | = | 110 | 95% | 5♥x | N | ♦2 | -4 | 1100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -4 | 1100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs MATTEUCCI 0 : 4 VP (match 45654) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | MATTEUCCI | |
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2♥ | S | ♣3 | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦x | E | ♠A | = | 510 | 86% | 4♣ | S | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 54% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦x | E | = | 510 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs FORNACIARI 2 : 2 VP (match 45655) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | FORNACIARI | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 3NT | N | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 51% | 5♦x | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs SEWIL 1 : 3 VP (match 45656) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | SEWIL | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1NT | N | ♦5 | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 110 | 65% | 3♦ | E | ♠K | = | 110 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs GUERRIERO 1 : 3 VP (match 45657) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | GUERRIERO | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 2♦x | E | ♠Q | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 4♦x | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 85% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | E | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs PUNCH 2 : 2 VP (match 45658) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | PUNCH | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 130 | 51% | 2NT | W | ♣3 | +1 | 150 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 98% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs WOMBATS 0 : 4 VP (match 45659) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | WOMBATS | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♦6 | = | 400 | 93% | 4♠ | S | ♥5 | = | 420 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♣6 | = | 400 | 73% | 3NTx | W | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 96% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | W | -2 | 300 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs VITA 4 : 0 VP (match 45660) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | VITA | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦5 | = | 110 | 54% | 2♠ | W | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♦ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 130 | 51% | 5♣x | S | ♥10 | -2 | 500 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| 28 | 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs COMPITALIA 3 : 1 VP (match 45661) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | COMPITALIA | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦3 | = | 90 | 64% | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 5♦ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 4♦ | W | ♠5 | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 5♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs KIWIS 4 : 0 VP (match 45662) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | KIWIS | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦4 | +1 | 120 | 67% | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | S | ♦6 | -6 | 600 | 90% | 6♣x | S | ♥10 | -3 | 800 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | S | -6 | 600 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs VICOZ 1.2 : 3.2 VP (match 45663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | VICOZ | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | Adj. | N | — | 90 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 5♦x | W | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| Adj. | N | 90 | ||||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs LUND 4 : 0 VP (match 45664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | LUND | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♠A | +1 | 140 | 79% | 1NT | S | ♦3 | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♦ | E | ♣K | +1 | 110 | 65% | 4♣x | S | ♦5 | -2 | 500 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs MAHAFFEY 1 : 3 VP (match 45665) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | MAHAFFEY | |
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2♥ | N | ♠A | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦ | W | ♣9 | = | 130 | 51% | 3♦ | E | ♣K | +1 | 130 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs CALANDRA 0 : 4 VP (match 45666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | CALANDRA | |
| 27 | 3NT | N | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 94% | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | ♣K | +1 | 130 | 51% | 3NTx | W | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | W | -2 | 300 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs BADGER 0 : 4 VP (match 45667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | BADGER | |
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2NT | S | ♠4 | = | 120 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 51% | 4♥ | N | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 67% | ||||
| 28 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs DARLING 0 : 4 VP (match 45668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | DARLING | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | ♦A | = | 510 | 86% | 3♣ | S | ♥10 | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 93% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | = | 510 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 45669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2♥ | N | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♥ | N | ♣6 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 5♣x | S | ♦5 | -3 | 800 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | ||||
| 28 | 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs GODZILLA 4 : 0 VP (match 45670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | GODZILLA | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 4♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 51% | 4♦x | E | ♣K | = | 510 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♦x | E | = | 510 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs RIDOLFO 4 : 0 VP (match 45671) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | RIDOLFO | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦3 | = | 110 | 54% | 3NT | S | ♠4 | -3 | 150 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | W | ♣3 | -2 | 100 | 85% | 4♦ | W | ♠10 | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -3 | 150 | 99% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs PBC GRAZ 0 : 4 VP (match 45672) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | PBC GRAZ | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 1NT | N | ♦J | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♣ | S | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 3NT | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 67% | ||||
| 28 | 5♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs MAX 1 : 3 VP (match 45673) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | MAX | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3NT | S | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 3♠ | S | ♦2 | -3 | 300 | 71% | 5♦x | W | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 3♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs LE BOMASC 0 : 4 VP (match 45674) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | LE BOMASC | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 1NT | N | ♦J | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 51% | 2NT | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 67% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs DJAWS TRIT 2.8 : 1.2 VP (match 45675) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 27 | 2NT | N | ♦J | = | 120 | 67% | Adj. | N | ♣2 | 120 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 51% | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| Adj. | N | 120 | 67% | |||||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs VINCI 3 : 1 VP (match 45676) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | VINCI | |
| 27 | 3♦ | E | ♠Q | -3 | 150 | 87% | 1NT | N | ♦J | +2 | 150 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 4♣x | S | ♥10 | -1 | 200 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♦3 | -5 | 500 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | E | -3 | 150 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 87% | ||||
| 28 | 4♣x | S | -1 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -5 | 500 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs CANNAVALE 0 : 4 VP (match 45677) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | CANNAVALE | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦J | = | 90 | 64% | 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | ♣3 | = | 510 | 86% | 4♦ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | = | 510 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs CZECH REPUBLIC 3 : 1 VP (match 45678) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 27 | 3NT | N | ♦2 | -3 | 150 | 99% | 3NT | N | ♦J | -3 | 150 | 99% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 3NTx | W | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 1NTx | W | ♥7 | +1 | 280 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | N | -3 | 150 | 99% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -3 | 150 | 99% | ||||
| 28 | 3NTx | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 1NTx | W | +1 | 280 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs SAGIVS TIGERS 2 : 2 VP (match 45679) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3♣ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | ♠6 | = | 510 | 86% | 4♠x | S | ♥10 | -6 | 1700 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 54% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦x | W | = | 510 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -6 | 1700 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs ENZ 4 : 0 VP (match 45680) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | ENZ | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠4 | +1 | 430 | 98% | 3NT | S | ♠3 | = | 400 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 3♦x | E | ♠3 | = | 470 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 93% | ||||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | E | = | 470 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs NATAF 0 : 4 VP (match 45681) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | NATAF | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦6 | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2♥ | N | ♠A | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♣x | S | ♦6 | -3 | 800 | 93% | 5♣x | N | ♠6 | -2 | 500 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 28 | 5♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -2 | 500 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs GILLIS 0 : 4 VP (match 45682) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | GILLIS | |
| 27 | 2♦x | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1NT | N | ♦6 | +1 | 120 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♥x | N | ♣8 | -1 | 200 | 65% | 3♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 67% | ||||
| 28 | 3♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs SVAERKE 2 : 2 VP (match 45683) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | SVAERKE | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 2NT | N | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♥x | N | ♣8 | -5 | 1400 | 99% | 2♦ | W | ♣6 | +2 | 130 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 4♥x | N | -5 | 1400 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | +2 | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs ORG REIGNWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 45684) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 27 | 2♥ | N | ♦J | = | 110 | 54% | 2NT | S | ♠7 | = | 120 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | ♥3 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 4♦x | W | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 67% | ||||
| 28 | 5♦x | E | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs INFERNO 2 : 2 VP (match 45685) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | INFERNO | |
| 27 | 1NT | N | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | = | 130 | 51% | 4♦ | E | ♣2 | = | 130 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|