Round 25 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 25 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | GODZILLA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | RIDOLFO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | PBC GRAZ | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | MAX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | LE BOMASC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | DJAWS TRIT | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | VINCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | CANNAVALE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | CZECH REPUBLIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | SAGIVS TIGERS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | ENZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | NATAF | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | GILLIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | SVAERKE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | ORG REIGNWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | INFERNO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | GOSSCHALK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | ACDC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | TARV | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | AJ DIAMENT | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | MATTEUCCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | FORNACIARI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | SEWIL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | GUERRIERO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | PUNCH | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | WOMBATS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | VITA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | COMPITALIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | KIWIS | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | VICOZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | LUND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | MAHAFFEY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | CALANDRA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | BADGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | DARLING | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | BEIJING TRINERGY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 25↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 25 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R25 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ISOARD | 66.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 2 | CALANDRA | 65.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 3 | MAHAFFEY | 63.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 3 | WOMBATS | 63.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 5 | MAIMUZZINI | 63.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 6 | CREMIN | 62.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 6 | VINCI | 62.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 8 | MIPIREDA | 61.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 9 | SILBERSEE | 60.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 10 | VICOZ | 59.60 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 11 | MAJOR | 59.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 12 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 58.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | 58.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 14 | LE BOMASC | 57.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 15 | ALEX | 57.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 16 | AJ DIAMENT | 56.40 | 2.40 | 25 |
| 16 | DE BOTTON | 56.40 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 18 | CFSC | 55.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 19 | BELGIUM | 54.40 | 2.40 | 25 |
| 19 | BINKIE | 54.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 21 | AJ DIAMENT II | 54.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 22 | VITA | 53.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 23 | CORALINE | 53.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 23 | KIBE | 53.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 23 | MCGUIRE | 53.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 26 | BADGER | 52.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 27 | PUNCH | 51.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 27 | VALIO | 51.40 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 29 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 51.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 29 | DYRKORN | 51.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 29 | GILLIS | 51.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 29 | GODZILLA | 51.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 29 | MAX | 51.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 29 | PENFOLD | 51.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 35 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 50.80 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 36 | FORNACIARI | 50.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 37 | CANNAVALE | 50.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 38 | COMPITALIA | 49.40 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 38 | FAILLA | 49.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 40 | ACDC | 49.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 40 | KANDEMIR | 49.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 40 | ROBERTSON | 49.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 40 | TARV | 49.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 44 | GOSSCHALK | 48.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 45 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 47.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 45 | DARLING | 47.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 45 | ENZ | 47.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 45 | VYTAS | 47.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 45 | YALMAN | 47.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 50 | MIAMI HEAT | 46.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 50 | NATAF | 46.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 52 | GINO | 45.60 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 53 | MATTEUCCI | 45.40 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 54 | SVAERKE | 45.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 55 | JOSE | 44.66 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 56 | HELNESS | 44.60 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 57 | LOLA | 44.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 58 | GUERRIERO | 43.40 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 59 | INFERNO | 43.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 60 | PBC GRAZ | 42.20 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 61 | STOPPA | 42.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 62 | SEWIL | 41.40 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 63 | DJAWS TRIT | 39.20 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 63 | FINNED | 39.20 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 65 | TACCETTI | 39.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 66 | RAFFI | 38.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 66 | RIDOLFO | 38.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 68 | LUND | 37.74 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 69 | JIANG | 36.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 70 | LEDGER | 31.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 71 | KIWIS | 27.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 72 | FLAVIA | 13.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 25 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R25 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs GODZILLA 1 : 3 VP (match 46226) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | GODZILLA | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♥K | -2 | 500 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♦9 | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2♥ | S | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs RIDOLFO 4 : 0 VP (match 46227) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | RIDOLFO | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 6♥ | N | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | ♦6 | = | 110 | 86% | 5♠x | N | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs PBC GRAZ 3 : 1 VP (match 46228) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | PBC GRAZ | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 2NT | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 59% | 5♠ | N | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs MAX 2 : 2 VP (match 46229) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | MAX | |
| 29 | 5♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2♦ | E | ♣2 | = | 90 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs LE BOMASC 2 : 2 VP (match 46230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | LE BOMASC | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 5♣x | E | ♥K | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 3♥ | W | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs DJAWS TRIT 3 : 1 VP (match 46231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 99% | 3♦ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs VINCI 3 : 1 VP (match 46232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | VINCI | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 5♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | N | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs CANNAVALE 2 : 2 VP (match 46233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | CANNAVALE | |
| 29 | 5♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♦x | E | ♥Q | -2 | 300 | 97% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♦x | E | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs CZECH REPUBLIC 2 : 2 VP (match 46234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 29 | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 85% | 2♣ | S | ♦8 | = | 90 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | S | = | 90 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs SAGIVS TIGERS 0 : 4 VP (match 46235) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 29 | 5♥x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 86% | 4♦ | E | ♥Q | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | E | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs ENZ 1 : 3 VP (match 46236) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | ENZ | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | ♦8 | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2♥ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs NATAF 1 : 3 VP (match 46237) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | NATAF | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 4♦x | E | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 75% | 3♠ | S | ♣4 | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs GILLIS 2 : 2 VP (match 46238) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | GILLIS | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♣ | E | — | -4 | 200 | 95% | 3♣ | E | ♥Q | -4 | 200 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♣ | E | -4 | 200 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | E | -4 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs SVAERKE 2 : 2 VP (match 46239) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | SVAERKE | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 6♣x | E | ♥4 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 85% | 2♥x | S | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | E | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 30 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs ORG REIGNWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 46240) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♥10 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | S | ♣6 | = | 140 | 85% | 4♦ | W | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs INFERNO 2 : 2 VP (match 46241) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | INFERNO | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♥9 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♣ | N | ♦A | = | 90 | 71% | 2♥ | S | ♠2 | -3 | 150 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 2♣ | N | = | 90 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs GOSSCHALK 2 : 2 VP (match 46242) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | GOSSCHALK | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 5♣x | E | ♥10 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♥x | S | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2♥x | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | ||||
| 30 | 4♥x | S | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs ACDC 2 : 2 VP (match 46243) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | ACDC | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♥4 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 5♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2NT | N | ♣6 | = | 120 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs TARV 4 : 0 VP (match 46244) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | TARV | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2NT | N | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs AJ DIAMENT 0 : 2.4 VP (match 46245) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 75% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs MATTEUCCI 3 : 1 VP (match 46246) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | MATTEUCCI | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♦10 | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♥x | S | ♦8 | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs FORNACIARI 4 : 0 VP (match 46247) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | FORNACIARI | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 5♣x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 85% | 3♦ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -1 | 200 | 72% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs SEWIL 4 : 0 VP (match 46248) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | SEWIL | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 85% | 3♠ | S | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs GUERRIERO 3 : 1 VP (match 46249) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | GUERRIERO | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 5♦x | E | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2♥x | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 5♦x | E | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs PUNCH 0 : 4 VP (match 46250) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | PUNCH | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♠2 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | ♦8 | -3 | 500 | 97% | 3♦ | E | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs WOMBATS 0 : 4 VP (match 46251) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | WOMBATS | |
| 29 | 5♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 5♣x | E | ♥10 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs VITA 4 : 0 VP (match 46252) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | VITA | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 5♥x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♥ | S | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2♥x | S | ♦8 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs COMPITALIA 2 : 2 VP (match 46253) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | COMPITALIA | |
| 29 | 5♣x | E | ♥4 | -2 | 500 | 65% | 5♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | ♦J | -2 | 300 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs KIWIS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 46254) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | KIWIS | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 75% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs VICOZ 1 : 3 VP (match 46255) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | VICOZ | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 4♠x | N | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs LUND 0 : 4 VP (match 46256) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | LUND | |
| 29 | 6♥ | N | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♣ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 3♦ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 2♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs MAHAFFEY 1 : 3 VP (match 46257) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | MAHAFFEY | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs CALANDRA 1 : 3 VP (match 46258) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | CALANDRA | |
| 29 | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs BADGER 2 : 2 VP (match 46259) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | BADGER | |
| 29 | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♦ | E | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 75% | 3♥x | S | ♦J | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs DARLING 2 : 2 VP (match 46260) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | DARLING | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 1 : 3 VP (match 46261) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 29 | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♦ | E | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♦ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 70% | ||||
| 30 | 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|