Round 20 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | DJAWS TRIT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | VINCI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | CANNAVALE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | CZECH REPUBLIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | SAGIVS TIGERS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | ENZ | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | NATAF | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | GILLIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | SVAERKE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | ORG REIGNWOOD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | INFERNO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | GOSSCHALK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | ACDC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | TARV | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | AJ DIAMENT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | MATTEUCCI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | FORNACIARI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | SEWIL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | GUERRIERO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | PUNCH | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | WOMBATS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | VITA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | COMPITALIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | KIWIS | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | VICOZ | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | LUND | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | MAHAFFEY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | CALANDRA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | BADGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | DARLING | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | BEIJING TRINERGY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | GODZILLA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | RIDOLFO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | PBC GRAZ | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | MAX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | LE BOMASC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIPIREDA | 53.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 2 | ISOARD | 53.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 3 | MAIMUZZINI | 52.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 4 | CREMIN | 51.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 5 | CALANDRA | 50.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 5 | MAHAFFEY | 50.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 7 | ALEX | 49.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 7 | MAJOR | 49.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 9 | WOMBATS | 48.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 10 | VINCI | 48.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 11 | VICOZ | 47.60 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 12 | DE BOTTON | 47.40 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 13 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 46.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 14 | BADGER | 45.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 15 | CORALINE | 45.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 15 | PENFOLD | 45.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 15 | SILBERSEE | 45.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 18 | AJ DIAMENT | 44.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 18 | BELGIUM | 44.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 18 | DYRKORN | 44.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 18 | SWISSALERT | 44.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 22 | VITA | 43.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 23 | LE BOMASC | 43.20 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 24 | BINKIE | 43.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 24 | CFSC | 43.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 24 | FORNACIARI | 43.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 27 | COMPITALIA | 42.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 28 | AJ DIAMENT II | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 28 | MAX | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 30 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 41.80 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 31 | JOSE | 41.66 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 32 | ACDC | 41.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 32 | CANNAVALE | 41.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 32 | FAILLA | 41.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 32 | GODZILLA | 41.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 32 | KIBE | 41.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 32 | MCGUIRE | 41.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 32 | TARV | 41.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 39 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 40.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 39 | DARLING | 40.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 39 | GOSSCHALK | 40.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 42 | GILLIS | 39.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 42 | KANDEMIR | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 44 | PUNCH | 37.40 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 44 | VALIO | 37.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 46 | PBC GRAZ | 37.20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 47 | GUERRIERO | 37.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 47 | STOPPA | 37.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 47 | YALMAN | 37.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 50 | INFERNO | 36.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 50 | NATAF | 36.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 50 | SVAERKE | 36.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 50 | VYTAS | 36.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 54 | ENZ | 35.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 54 | SEWIL | 35.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 56 | MIAMI HEAT | 34.60 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 57 | DJAWS TRIT | 34.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 58 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 34.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 58 | LOLA | 34.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 60 | MATTEUCCI | 33.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 60 | ROBERTSON | 33.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 62 | HELNESS | 32.60 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 63 | FINNED | 32.20 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 63 | GINO | 32.20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 65 | TACCETTI | 32.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 66 | RIDOLFO | 31.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 67 | LUND | 29.74 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 68 | RAFFI | 28.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 69 | KIWIS | 27.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 70 | JIANG | 24.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 71 | LEDGER | 22.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 72 | FLAVIA | 13.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs DJAWS TRIT 4 : 0 VP (match 46046) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥7 | = | 990 | 70% | 5♣ | N | ♣Q | -10 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 92% | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | -10 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs VINCI 1 : 3 VP (match 46047) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | VINCI | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♣7 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | S | ♥J | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | +1 | 1020 | 94% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs CANNAVALE 1 : 3 VP (match 46048) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | CANNAVALE | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♦A | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♣3 | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs CZECH REPUBLIC 2 : 2 VP (match 46049) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♣2 | = | 990 | 70% | 7NT | N | — | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | — | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 7NT | N | -1 | 50 | 92% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs SAGIVS TIGERS 4 : 0 VP (match 46050) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | S | ♠3 | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs ENZ 3 : 1 VP (match 46051) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | ENZ | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs NATAF 0 : 4 VP (match 46052) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | NATAF | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 6NT | N | ♦7 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs GILLIS 3 : 1 VP (match 46053) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | GILLIS | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 6NT | N | ♣5 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs SVAERKE 2 : 2 VP (match 46054) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | SVAERKE | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♣3 | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | +1 | 650 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | S | +1 | 650 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs ORG REIGNWOOD 1 : 3 VP (match 46055) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♣3 | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 6♠x | N | ♦K | -3 | 800 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 6♠x | N | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs INFERNO 0 : 4 VP (match 46056) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | INFERNO | |
| 19 | 7♠ | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 92% | 6NT | N | ♣2 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 1♠ | N | ♦A | +3 | 170 | 54% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 7♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 1♠ | N | +3 | 170 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs GOSSCHALK 2 : 2 VP (match 46057) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | GOSSCHALK | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs ACDC 2 : 2 VP (match 46058) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | ACDC | |
| 19 | 6NT | S | ♥J | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3NT | N | ♦4 | = | 600 | 51% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | S | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 20 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs TARV 4 : 0 VP (match 46059) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | TARV | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | S | ♣2 | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 5♠x | N | ♥8 | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | N | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs AJ DIAMENT 2 : 2 VP (match 46060) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♦A | = | 980 | 65% | 7NTx | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♥3 | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 7NTx | S | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs MATTEUCCI 4 : 0 VP (match 46061) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | MATTEUCCI | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 6NT | S | ♥J | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠x | N | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs FORNACIARI 4 : 0 VP (match 46062) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | FORNACIARI | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 7NTx | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | ♦2 | = | 790 | 99% | 4♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 7NTx | N | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | = | 790 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs SEWIL 0 : 4 VP (match 46063) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | SEWIL | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 6NT | S | ♠7 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠x | N | ♦A | = | 790 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | = | 790 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs GUERRIERO 2 : 2 VP (match 46064) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | GUERRIERO | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♣2 | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs PUNCH 0 : 2.4 VP (match 46065) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | PUNCH | |
| 19 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 87% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 60% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 87% | ||||
| 20 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs WOMBATS 1 : 3 VP (match 46066) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | WOMBATS | |
| 19 | 7NTx | N | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 7NTx | N | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs VITA 1 : 3 VP (match 46067) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | VITA | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♦7 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | N | ♥2 | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 3NT | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 51% | 5♠ | N | ♦K | = | 650 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs COMPITALIA 1 : 3 VP (match 46068) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | COMPITALIA | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | N | ♥6 | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs KIWIS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 46069) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | KIWIS | |
| 19 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 87% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 60% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 87% | ||||
| 20 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs VICOZ 2 : 2 VP (match 46070) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | VICOZ | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | S | ♥5 | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 6♠x | N | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 97% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 6♠x | N | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs LUND 3 : 1 VP (match 46071) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | LUND | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 6NT | N | ♥9 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 68% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs MAHAFFEY 0 : 4 VP (match 46072) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | MAHAFFEY | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♣2 | = | 980 | 65% | 6NT | N | ♥8 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs CALANDRA 1 : 3 VP (match 46073) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | CALANDRA | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♦A | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♥J | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs BADGER 3 : 1 VP (match 46074) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | BADGER | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | N | ♥8 | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs DARLING 3 : 1 VP (match 46075) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | DARLING | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | S | ♦A | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs BEIJING TRINERGY 1 : 3 VP (match 46076) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 19 | 6♠ | S | ♠3 | = | 980 | 65% | 6♠ | S | ♦A | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs GODZILLA 1 : 3 VP (match 46077) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | GODZILLA | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥9 | = | 990 | 70% | 6NT | N | ♣7 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs RIDOLFO 2 : 2 VP (match 46078) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | RIDOLFO | |
| 19 | 7NT | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 92% | 5♠ | S | ♥J | = | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 7NT | S | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | S | = | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs PBC GRAZ 3 : 1 VP (match 46079) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | PBC GRAZ | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♠7 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 6NT | N | ♥7 | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs MAX 2 : 2 VP (match 46080) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | MAX | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♣5 | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 7NT | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 3♥ | N | ♣A | -7 | 700 | 99% | 4♠ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | +1 | 1020 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 7NT | S | -1 | 50 | 92% | ||||
| 20 | 3♥ | N | -7 | 700 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs LE BOMASC 2 : 2 VP (match 46081) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | LE BOMASC | |
| 19 | 6NT | N | ♥8 | = | 990 | 70% | 6♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 980 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | ♥6 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 19 | 6NT | N | = | 990 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 980 | 65% | ||||
| 20 | 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|