Round 14 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | NATAF | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | GILLIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | SVAERKE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | ORG REIGNWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | INFERNO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | GOSSCHALK | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | ACDC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | TARV | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | AJ DIAMENT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | MATTEUCCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | FORNACIARI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | SEWIL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | GUERRIERO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | PUNCH | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | WOMBATS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | VITA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | COMPITALIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | KIWIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | VICOZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | LUND | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | MAHAFFEY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | CALANDRA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | BADGER | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | DARLING | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | BEIJING TRINERGY | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | GODZILLA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | RIDOLFO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | PBC GRAZ | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | MAX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | LE BOMASC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | DJAWS TRIT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | VINCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | CANNAVALE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | CZECH REPUBLIC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | SAGIVS TIGERS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | ENZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIPIREDA | 40.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 2 | MAIMUZZINI | 38.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 3 | CALANDRA | 36.40 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 4 | VICOZ | 36.20 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 5 | ISOARD | 36.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 5 | TARV | 36.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 7 | MAJOR | 35.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 7 | MAX | 35.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 9 | MAHAFFEY | 34.40 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 10 | BINKIE | 34.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 10 | CANNAVALE | 34.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 10 | CREMIN | 34.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 10 | PENFOLD | 34.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 14 | BADGER | 32.40 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 15 | AJ DIAMENT | 32.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 15 | DE BOTTON | 32.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 15 | WOMBATS | 32.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 18 | LE BOMASC | 31.20 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 18 | PBC GRAZ | 31.20 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 20 | ACDC | 31.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 20 | AJ DIAMENT II | 31.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 20 | CFSC | 31.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 23 | BELGIUM | 30.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 23 | CORALINE | 30.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 23 | DYRKORN | 30.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 23 | GILLIS | 30.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 23 | SILBERSEE | 30.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 23 | SWISSALERT | 30.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 29 | ALEX | 29.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 29 | DARLING | 29.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 29 | ENZ | 29.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 29 | FAILLA | 29.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 29 | FORNACIARI | 29.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 29 | VINCI | 29.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 29 | VITA | 29.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 36 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 28.80 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 37 | GOSSCHALK | 28.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 37 | KIBE | 28.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 37 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 28.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 40 | MCGUIRE | 27.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 40 | NATAF | 27.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 40 | VALIO | 27.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 43 | JOSE | 26.66 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 44 | COMPITALIA | 26.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 44 | INFERNO | 26.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 46 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 25.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 46 | GUERRIERO | 25.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 46 | KANDEMIR | 25.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 46 | MATTEUCCI | 25.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 46 | SVAERKE | 25.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 46 | VYTAS | 25.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 46 | YALMAN | 25.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 53 | MIAMI HEAT | 24.60 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 54 | DJAWS TRIT | 24.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 55 | GODZILLA | 24.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 55 | RAFFI | 24.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 55 | RIDOLFO | 24.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 55 | SEWIL | 24.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 55 | STOPPA | 24.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 60 | HELNESS | 23.20 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 61 | KIWIS | 23.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 61 | LOLA | 23.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 61 | ROBERTSON | 23.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 64 | GINO | 22.20 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 65 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 22.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 65 | PUNCH | 22.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 67 | FINNED | 20.20 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 68 | JIANG | 20.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 68 | TACCETTI | 20.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 70 | LUND | 17.74 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 71 | LEDGER | 15.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 72 | FLAVIA | 13.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs NATAF 3 : 1 VP (match 45830) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | NATAF | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠10 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs GILLIS 1 : 3 VP (match 45831) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | GILLIS | |
| 7 | 3♥ | E | ♣3 | -3 | 300 | 93% | 3♦x | W | ♣K | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | E | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs SVAERKE 1 : 3 VP (match 45832) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | SVAERKE | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦8 | = | 920 | 58% | 5♣ | W | ♠Q | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs ORG REIGNWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 45833) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs INFERNO 2 : 2 VP (match 45834) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | INFERNO | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦5 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs GOSSCHALK 1 : 3 VP (match 45835) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | GOSSCHALK | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦8 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♥7 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs ACDC 2 : 2 VP (match 45836) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | ACDC | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠7 | = | 920 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♥J | +1 | 430 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs TARV 2 : 2 VP (match 45837) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | TARV | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 4♣ | N | ♦3 | = | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦5 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦8 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs AJ DIAMENT 1 : 3 VP (match 45838) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦8 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs MATTEUCCI 2 : 2 VP (match 45839) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | MATTEUCCI | |
| 7 | 2♦ | W | ♣K | = | 90 | 87% | 2♣ | N | ♦6 | +2 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 6♣ | E | ♥8 | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | N | +2 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs FORNACIARI 2 : 2 VP (match 45840) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | FORNACIARI | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 4♣ | N | ♦2 | = | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦8 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs SEWIL 2 : 2 VP (match 45841) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | SEWIL | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 4♣x | N | ♦7 | = | 710 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥J | +2 | 460 | 87% | 6♣ | E | ♠7 | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | N | = | 710 | 100% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs GUERRIERO 3 : 1 VP (match 45842) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | GUERRIERO | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 3NT | S | ♦J | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♣A | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs PUNCH 0 : 4 VP (match 45843) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | PUNCH | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♣ | N | ♦6 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 5♣ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 420 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs WOMBATS 2 : 2 VP (match 45844) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | WOMBATS | |
| 7 | 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs VITA 1 : 3 VP (match 45845) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | VITA | |
| 7 | 3NT | S | ♦A | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2♦ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦10 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs COMPITALIA 2 : 2 VP (match 45846) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | COMPITALIA | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | +2 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥7 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♦6 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♣ | N | +2 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs KIWIS 3 : 1 VP (match 45847) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | KIWIS | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠5 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♠10 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs VICOZ 1 : 3 VP (match 45848) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | VICOZ | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♣ | N | ♦5 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♠8 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦5 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs LUND 0 : 2.4 VP (match 45849) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | LUND | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 85% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 85% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 98% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 98% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 85% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 85% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 98% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs MAHAFFEY 1 : 3 VP (match 45850) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | MAHAFFEY | |
| 7 | 7♦x | W | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 84% | 3♦x | W | ♣K | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥7 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 7♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs CALANDRA 1 : 3 VP (match 45851) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | CALANDRA | |
| 7 | 3NT | S | ♦A | -3 | 300 | 97% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs BADGER 1 : 3 VP (match 45852) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | BADGER | |
| 7 | 3♦ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♠5 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs DARLING 3 : 1 VP (match 45853) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | DARLING | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦6 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | +2 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 5♣ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 420 | 94% | 6♣ | W | ♥7 | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♣ | N | +2 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 5♣ | E | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 3 : 1 VP (match 45854) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -3 | 300 | 93% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs GODZILLA 3 : 1 VP (match 45855) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | GODZILLA | |
| 7 | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 53% | 4♣ | N | ♦8 | = | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | W | ♥3 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 4♥x | S | ♠2 | -4 | 800 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -4 | 800 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs RIDOLFO 1 : 3 VP (match 45856) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | RIDOLFO | |
| 7 | 2♦ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs PBC GRAZ 3 : 1 VP (match 45857) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | PBC GRAZ | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs MAX 0 : 4 VP (match 45858) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | MAX | |
| 7 | 3♠ | N | ♦7 | = | 140 | 76% | 3♦ | W | ♣Q | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 920 | 58% | 6NT | E | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs LE BOMASC 3 : 1 VP (match 45859) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | LE BOMASC | |
| 7 | 5♣ | N | ♥8 | = | 600 | 99% | 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♥7 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♣ | N | = | 600 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs DJAWS TRIT 2 : 2 VP (match 45860) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | +2 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | ♥5 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♣ | N | +2 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs VINCI 3 : 1 VP (match 45861) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | VINCI | |
| 7 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 3♦ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♣A | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs CANNAVALE 1 : 3 VP (match 45862) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | CANNAVALE | |
| 7 | 2♦ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♦ | E | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♦8 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 84% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs CZECH REPUBLIC 3 : 1 VP (match 45863) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 130 | 53% | 3♣ | N | ♦J | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 5♣ | E | ♦8 | +1 | 420 | 94% | 6♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 920 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 5♣ | E | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs SAGIVS TIGERS 1 : 3 VP (match 45864) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 7 | 5♣xx | N | ♦7 | -1 | 400 | 100% | 3♦ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♠6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♣A | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♣xx | N | -1 | 400 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 84% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs ENZ 1 : 3 VP (match 45865) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | ENZ | |
| 7 | 3♦ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | +2 | 130 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | ♥6 | = | 920 | 58% | 6♣ | E | ♠10 | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | N | +2 | 130 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|