Round 10 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | INFERNO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | GOSSCHALK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | ACDC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | TARV | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | AJ DIAMENT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | MATTEUCCI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | FORNACIARI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | SEWIL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | GUERRIERO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | PUNCH | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | WOMBATS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | VITA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | COMPITALIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | KIWIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | VICOZ | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | LUND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | MAHAFFEY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | CALANDRA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | BADGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | DARLING | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | BEIJING TRINERGY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | GODZILLA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | RIDOLFO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | PBC GRAZ | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | MAX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | LE BOMASC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | DJAWS TRIT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | VINCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | CANNAVALE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | CZECH REPUBLIC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | SAGIVS TIGERS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | ENZ | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | NATAF | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | GILLIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | SVAERKE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | ORG REIGNWOOD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIPIREDA | 34.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 2 | MAIMUZZINI | 28.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 3 | ISOARD | 27.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 3 | TARV | 27.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 5 | CANNAVALE | 26.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 5 | CREMIN | 26.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 5 | LE BOMASC | 26.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | BADGER | 25.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | MAHAFFEY | 25.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 8 | PBC GRAZ | 25.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 8 | SWISSALERT | 25.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | WOMBATS | 25.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 13 | BELGIUM | 24.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 13 | BINKIE | 24.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 13 | MAX | 24.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 13 | PENFOLD | 24.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 17 | VICOZ | 23.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 18 | AJ DIAMENT | 23.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 18 | CALANDRA | 23.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 18 | GILLIS | 23.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 18 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 23.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 22 | CFSC | 22.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 22 | DE BOTTON | 22.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 22 | MAJOR | 22.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 22 | SILBERSEE | 22.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 22 | VINCI | 22.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | ACDC | 21.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | AJ DIAMENT II | 21.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | ALEX | 21.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | CORALINE | 21.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 27 | FAILLA | 21.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | NATAF | 21.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 27 | SEWIL | 21.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 34 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 20.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 35 | COMPITALIA | 20.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 35 | DARLING | 20.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 35 | DYRKORN | 20.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 35 | FORNACIARI | 20.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 39 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 19.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 39 | KANDEMIR | 19.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 39 | KIBE | 19.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 39 | MATTEUCCI | 19.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 39 | MCGUIRE | 19.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 39 | STOPPA | 19.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 39 | VALIO | 19.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 46 | MIAMI HEAT | 18.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 47 | ENZ | 18.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 47 | GOSSCHALK | 18.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 47 | GUERRIERO | 18.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 47 | INFERNO | 18.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 47 | LOLA | 18.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 47 | VITA | 18.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 47 | YALMAN | 18.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 54 | HELNESS | 17.20 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 55 | GODZILLA | 17.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 55 | KIWIS | 17.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 57 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 16.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 57 | RAFFI | 16.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 57 | SVAERKE | 16.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 57 | VYTAS | 16.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 61 | DJAWS TRIT | 15.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 61 | FINNED | 15.20 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 63 | ROBERTSON | 15.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 64 | JOSE | 14.66 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 65 | GINO | 14.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 65 | RIDOLFO | 14.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 67 | FLAVIA | 13.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 67 | JIANG | 13.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 67 | PUNCH | 13.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 70 | LUND | 12.34 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 71 | TACCETTI | 11.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 72 | LEDGER | 9.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs INFERNO 2 : 2 VP (match 45686) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | INFERNO | |
| 29 | 4♥x | W | ♦4 | = | 790 | 99% | 4♥ | N | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | -4 | 200 | 91% | 2♠ | S | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | W | = | 790 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 4♥ | E | -4 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs GOSSCHALK 2 : 2 VP (match 45687) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | GOSSCHALK | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♥x | N | ♦6 | -2 | 500 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♣6 | = | 120 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 87% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs ACDC 2 : 2 VP (match 45688) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | ACDC | |
| 29 | 4♥xx | N | ♦2 | -2 | 1000 | 100% | 3♥ | N | ♦3 | = | 140 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠x | W | ♣2 | -2 | 300 | 94% | 2NT | W | ♣9 | +1 | 150 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥xx | N | -2 | 1000 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 77% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠x | W | -2 | 300 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs TARV 3 : 1 VP (match 45689) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | TARV | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 4♠ | W | ♣2 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 3♠ | W | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs AJ DIAMENT 2 : 2 VP (match 45690) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♦x | E | ♣8 | = | 710 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♦x | E | = | 710 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs MATTEUCCI 4 : 0 VP (match 45691) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | MATTEUCCI | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦2 | = | 790 | 97% | 4♥x | N | ♠4 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | ♦J | -3 | 150 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs FORNACIARI 4 : 0 VP (match 45692) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | FORNACIARI | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 5♦x | E | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♥ | E | ♠4 | = | 110 | 86% | 1NTx | E | ♦2 | +1 | 280 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | = | 750 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 1NTx | E | +1 | 280 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs SEWIL 2 : 2 VP (match 45693) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | SEWIL | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♣ | E | ♠4 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2♦ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2♣ | E | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs GUERRIERO 2 : 2 VP (match 45694) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | GUERRIERO | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs PUNCH 3 : 1 VP (match 45695) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | PUNCH | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦6 | = | 790 | 97% | 4♥x | N | ♦6 | = | 790 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♥ | E | ♠4 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2NT | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 97% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs WOMBATS 2 : 2 VP (match 45696) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | WOMBATS | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦4 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 79% | 1♥ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | E | +1 | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs VITA 2 : 2 VP (match 45697) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | VITA | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♦8 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♦6 | = | 120 | 94% | 5♣ | E | ♣5 | -5 | 250 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -5 | 250 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs COMPITALIA 2 : 2 VP (match 45698) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | COMPITALIA | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦4 | = | 790 | 97% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♥x | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 4♥x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 4♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs KIWIS 1 : 3 VP (match 45699) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | KIWIS | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3NT | E | ♦5 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2♦x | S | ♥J | = | 180 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | S | = | 180 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs VICOZ 2 : 2 VP (match 45700) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | VICOZ | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 3♥ | N | ♠5 | = | 140 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | E | ♦Q | -3 | 150 | 82% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 77% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs LUND 4 : 0 VP (match 45701) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | LUND | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2♦ | S | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs MAHAFFEY 1 : 3 VP (match 45702) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | MAHAFFEY | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs CALANDRA 0 : 4 VP (match 45703) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | CALANDRA | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠3 | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♦ | S | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 4♥x | E | ♠4 | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | ||||
| 30 | 3♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | E | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs BADGER 2 : 2 VP (match 45704) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | BADGER | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠4 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♠ | E | ♠4 | = | 110 | 86% | 4♥ | E | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs DARLING 2 : 2 VP (match 45705) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | DARLING | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦7 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2♥ | E | ♦5 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 4 : 0 VP (match 45706) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 29 | 3♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 140 | 77% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♠ | W | ♣2 | -4 | 200 | 91% | 2NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 4♠ | W | -4 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs GODZILLA 4 : 0 VP (match 45707) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | GODZILLA | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 5♦x | W | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 1♥ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♠ | E | ♠4 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | = | 750 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 1♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs RIDOLFO 4 : 0 VP (match 45708) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | RIDOLFO | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | = | 620 | 87% | 5♥x | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2NT | E | ♦5 | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs PBC GRAZ 4 : 0 VP (match 45709) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | PBC GRAZ | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♥x | E | ♠4 | -3 | 500 | 97% | 4♠ | W | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs MAX 2 : 2 VP (match 45710) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | MAX | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 87% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | S | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2♥ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs LE BOMASC 2 : 2 VP (match 45711) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | LE BOMASC | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 5♥x | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | ♥9 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs DJAWS TRIT 2 : 2 VP (match 45712) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | ♣2 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2NT | E | ♣7 | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs VINCI 2 : 2 VP (match 45713) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | VINCI | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 4♥x | N | ♦6 | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 5♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2♦ | S | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 97% | ||||
| 30 | 5♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs CANNAVALE 3 : 1 VP (match 45714) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | CANNAVALE | |
| 29 | 5♥x | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 4♥x | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 3♥ | E | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2NT | E | ♣5 | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs CZECH REPUBLIC 1 : 3 VP (match 45715) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 29 | 5♦x | E | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3♠ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♦x | E | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs SAGIVS TIGERS 3 : 1 VP (match 45716) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | ♠Q | = | 90 | 59% | 2♥ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs ENZ 0 : 4 VP (match 45717) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | ENZ | |
| 29 | 5♦x | E | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | E | ♦3 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 4♠ | W | ♣9 | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♦x | E | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs NATAF 3 : 1 VP (match 45718) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | NATAF | |
| 29 | 4♥x | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 5♦x | E | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | = | 750 | 94% | ||||
| 30 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs GILLIS 2 : 2 VP (match 45719) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | GILLIS | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2NT | E | ♦5 | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs SVAERKE 4 : 0 VP (match 45720) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | SVAERKE | |
| 29 | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥x | N | ♠4 | -1 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 4♥x | E | ♠4 | -3 | 500 | 97% | 3NT | E | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| 30 | 4♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs ORG REIGNWOOD 1 : 3 VP (match 45721) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 29 | 5♦x | E | ♥10 | = | 750 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣10 | = | 620 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 2♠ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2NT | E | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 5♦x | E | = | 750 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 87% | ||||
| 30 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|