Round 1 — BAM Teams I
36 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAJOR | PUNCH | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ROBERTSON | WOMBATS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YALMAN | VITA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CREMIN | COMPITALIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALEX | KIWIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LOLA | VICOZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JIANG | LUND | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SILBERSEE | MAHAFFEY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ISOARD | CALANDRA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PENFOLD | BADGER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JOSE | DARLING | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SWISSALERT | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AJ DIAMENT II | GODZILLA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FINNED | RIDOLFO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KIBE | PBC GRAZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CFSC | MAX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MCGUIRE | LE BOMASC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEDGER | DJAWS TRIT | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | RAFFI | VINCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FLAVIA | CANNAVALE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MIPIREDA | CZECH REPUBLIC | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VALIO | SAGIVS TIGERS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | HELNESS | ENZ | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DE BOTTON | NATAF | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FAILLA | GILLIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIAMI HEAT | SVAERKE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BINKIE | ORG REIGNWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | GINO | INFERNO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | BELGIUM | GOSSCHALK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 30 | CORALINE | ACDC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 31 | DYRKORN | TARV | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 32 | TACCETTI | AJ DIAMENT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 33 | VYTAS | MATTEUCCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 34 | MAIMUZZINI | FORNACIARI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 35 | KANDEMIR | SEWIL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 36 | STOPPA | GUERRIERO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALEX | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | CANNAVALE | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | DARLING | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | GODZILLA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | MAIMUZZINI | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | MAJOR | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | MIPIREDA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | PENFOLD | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 10 | AJ DIAMENT | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | BELGIUM | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | CORALINE | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | DYRKORN | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | FAILLA | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | GUERRIERO | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | INFERNO | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | KANDEMIR | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | LE BOMASC | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | LEDGER | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | LUND | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | PBC GRAZ | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | VICOZ | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | VITA | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 24 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | BINKIE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | CALANDRA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | CFSC | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | COMPITALIA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | CREMIN | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | ENZ | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | FINNED | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | HELNESS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | ISOARD | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | MAHAFFEY | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | MATTEUCCI | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | MAX | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | MIAMI HEAT | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | ORG REIGNWOOD | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | RAFFI | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | RIDOLFO | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | ROBERTSON | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | SAGIVS TIGERS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | SILBERSEE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | SVAERKE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | SWISSALERT | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | VALIO | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | VINCI | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | VYTAS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | WOMBATS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 50 | ACDC | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | DJAWS TRIT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | GILLIS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | GINO | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | GOSSCHALK | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | JIANG | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | KIBE | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | LOLA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | MCGUIRE | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | SEWIL | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | STOPPA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | TACCETTI | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | TARV | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 50 | YALMAN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 64 | AJ DIAMENT II | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | BADGER | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | CZECH REPUBLIC | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | FLAVIA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | FORNACIARI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | JOSE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | KIWIS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | NATAF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 64 | PUNCH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
MAJOR vs PUNCH 4 : 0 VP (match 45362) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAJOR | PUNCH | |
| 11 | 2♦x | E | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♥4 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 2♦x | E | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROBERTSON vs WOMBATS 2 : 2 VP (match 45363) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROBERTSON | WOMBATS | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠8 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YALMAN vs VITA 1 : 3 VP (match 45364) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YALMAN | VITA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | S | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3NT | N | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♥4 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 3♠ | E | ♠6 | = | 140 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CREMIN vs COMPITALIA 2 : 2 VP (match 45365) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CREMIN | COMPITALIA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALEX vs KIWIS 4 : 0 VP (match 45366) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALEX | KIWIS | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 53% | 1NT | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠8 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 62% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LOLA vs VICOZ 1 : 3 VP (match 45367) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LOLA | VICOZ | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JIANG vs LUND 1 : 3 VP (match 45368) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JIANG | LUND | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♠5 | = | 420 | 56% | 2♠ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILBERSEE vs MAHAFFEY 2 : 2 VP (match 45369) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILBERSEE | MAHAFFEY | |
| 11 | 1NT | N | ♣5 | +1 | 120 | 62% | 4♠ | N | ♣5 | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠8 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISOARD vs CALANDRA 2 : 2 VP (match 45370) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISOARD | CALANDRA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 1NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 150 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PENFOLD vs BADGER 4 : 0 VP (match 45371) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PENFOLD | BADGER | |
| 11 | 1NT | N | ♥J | = | 90 | 65% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 430 | 58% | 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JOSE vs DARLING 0 : 4 VP (match 45372) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JOSE | DARLING | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3♠ | N | ♥Q | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠x | W | ♥6 | = | 590 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠x | W | = | 590 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWISSALERT vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 45373) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWISSALERT | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠8 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣Q | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT II vs GODZILLA 0 : 4 VP (match 45374) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT II | GODZILLA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINNED vs RIDOLFO 2 : 2 VP (match 45375) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINNED | RIDOLFO | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2NT | N | ♣5 | = | 120 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 58% | 4♠ | W | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 62% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs PBC GRAZ 1 : 3 VP (match 45376) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | PBC GRAZ | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | +2 | 480 | 97% | 2♠ | W | ♠5 | +3 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 480 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CFSC vs MAX 2 : 2 VP (match 45377) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CFSC | MAX | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 3♠ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 3NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 430 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MCGUIRE vs LE BOMASC 1 : 3 VP (match 45378) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MCGUIRE | LE BOMASC | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2♠ | W | ♥4 | +3 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEDGER vs DJAWS TRIT 3 : 1 VP (match 45379) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEDGER | DJAWS TRIT | |
| 11 | 3♠ | N | ♥Q | +1 | 170 | 54% | 4♠ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 170 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RAFFI vs VINCI 2 : 2 VP (match 45380) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RAFFI | VINCI | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 1NT | N | ♥3 | +3 | 180 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 3♠ | W | ♣Q | +2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +3 | 180 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FLAVIA vs CANNAVALE 0 : 4 VP (match 45381) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FLAVIA | CANNAVALE | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | E | ♦8 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIPIREDA vs CZECH REPUBLIC 4 : 0 VP (match 45382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIPIREDA | CZECH REPUBLIC | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♣Q | = | 420 | 56% | 3NT | W | ♦K | +3 | 490 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 490 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VALIO vs SAGIVS TIGERS 2 : 2 VP (match 45383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VALIO | SAGIVS TIGERS | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1NT | W | ♥6 | +3 | 180 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HELNESS vs ENZ 2 : 2 VP (match 45384) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HELNESS | ENZ | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♦7 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | ♥4 | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2♠ | W | ♥6 | +2 | 170 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs NATAF 4 : 0 VP (match 45385) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | NATAF | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 170 | 90% | 4♠ | W | ♣Q | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FAILLA vs GILLIS 3 : 1 VP (match 45386) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FAILLA | GILLIS | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 1NT | E | ♥6 | +3 | 180 | 83% | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 1NT | E | +3 | 180 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIAMI HEAT vs SVAERKE 2 : 2 VP (match 45387) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIAMI HEAT | SVAERKE | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 3♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 140 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 3♠ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 59% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BINKIE vs ORG REIGNWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 45388) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BINKIE | ORG REIGNWOOD | |
| 11 | 3♠ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3♠ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣Q | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GINO vs INFERNO 1 : 3 VP (match 45389) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GINO | INFERNO | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs GOSSCHALK 3 : 1 VP (match 45390) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | GOSSCHALK | |
| 11 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | S | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 3♠ | W | ♥6 | +2 | 200 | 75% | 4♠ | W | ♦8 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CORALINE vs ACDC 3 : 1 VP (match 45391) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CORALINE | ACDC | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♠4 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | ♥6 | +3 | 200 | 75% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 75% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DYRKORN vs TARV 3 : 1 VP (match 45392) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DYRKORN | TARV | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♣Q | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♦8 | = | 420 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TACCETTI vs AJ DIAMENT 1 : 3 VP (match 45393) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TACCETTI | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | E | ♣A | +2 | 200 | 75% | 2♠ | W | ♣Q | +3 | 200 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VYTAS vs MATTEUCCI 2 : 2 VP (match 45394) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VYTAS | MATTEUCCI | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥7 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | ♠8 | = | 420 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | = | 420 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAIMUZZINI vs FORNACIARI 4 : 0 VP (match 45395) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAIMUZZINI | FORNACIARI | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 420 | 77% | 1NT | N | ♦2 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 1NT | E | ♦8 | +4 | 210 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| 12 | 1NT | E | +4 | 210 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KANDEMIR vs SEWIL 3 : 1 VP (match 45396) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KANDEMIR | SEWIL | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♠2 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | ♥4 | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2NT | W | ♣Q | +2 | 180 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +2 | 180 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
STOPPA vs GUERRIERO 1 : 3 VP (match 45397) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | STOPPA | GUERRIERO | |
| 11 | 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3♠ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 170 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 79% | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 54% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|