Round 9 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NONAME TUR | FRANCE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BRENO | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | YOUNG SWEDES | NEMESIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | LATVIA | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | LUPO VELOCE | MORAN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | SALAMA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BELL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BYE | TALMAT | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 9 | NETHERLANDS RED | CUNEO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PACIFIC | HARRIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FORMIDABLES | MARILL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | PAUNCZ | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | MAROSAMITAWA | ESTONIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TESSIERES | NEVER CLAIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | BYE | AJ DIAMENT | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 16 | BRUNET | POLAND | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NONAME | 24.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 10 | NETHERLANDS RED | 23.40 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 11 | AJ DIAMENT | 22.40 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 11 | BRENO | 22.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 11 | YOUNG SWEDES | 22.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 14 | MORAN | 22.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 14 | NEMESIS | 22.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 16 | TESSIERES | 21.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 17 | DE KNIJFF | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 17 | POLAND | 21.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 19 | MAROSAMITAWA | 20.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | PAUNCZ | 20.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 21 | NONAME TUR | 19.40 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 22 | TALMAT | 18.40 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 23 | NEVER CLAIM | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 24 | BRUNET | 17.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 24 | FORMIDABLES | 17.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 26 | CUNEO | 17.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 27 | BELL | 16.40 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 27 | LUPO VELOCE | 16.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 29 | ESTONIA | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 29 | FRANCE SENIORS | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 31 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 15.40 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 31 | LATVIA | 15.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 31 | PACIFIC | 15.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 34 | HARRIS | 14.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 34 | SALAMA | 14.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 36 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 13.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 37 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 12.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 37 | MARILL | 12.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
NONAME TUR vs FRANCE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 33094) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME TUR | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 17 | 3♥ | N | ♠3 | = | 140 | 79% | 2♠ | N | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 73% | 2♥ | E | ♥3 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs DE KNIJFF 2 : 2 VP (match 33095) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | DE KNIJFF | |
| 17 | 2NT | E | ♦4 | = | 120 | 95% | 3NTx | E | ♥Q | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 1NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 120 | 61% | 3♥ | E | ♣3 | = | 140 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | E | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 18 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YOUNG SWEDES vs NEMESIS 2 : 2 VP (match 33096) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YOUNG SWEDES | NEMESIS | |
| 17 | 3♦ | S | ♥K | = | 110 | 63% | 3♥ | N | ♣K | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 2♥ | E | ♠8 | +3 | 200 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +3 | 200 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 33097) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | NONAME | |
| 17 | 2♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2♥ | N | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 110 | 73% | 3♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs MORAN 0 : 4 VP (match 33098) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | MORAN | |
| 17 | 3♦x | S | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2♦ | S | ♥K | = | 90 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 1NT | E | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 50% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs SALAMA 3 : 1 VP (match 33099) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | SALAMA | |
| 17 | Adj. | E | ♥3 | 140 | 79% | 3♥ | N | ♣K | = | 140 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♥6 | = | 110 | 73% | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | Adj. | E | 140 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 33100) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 17 | 3♣ | E | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3♦x | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 1NT | E | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 18 | 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs TALMAT 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33101) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | TALMAT | |
| 17 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| 18 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs CUNEO 4 : 0 VP (match 33158) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | CUNEO | |
| 17 | 2♠x | W | ♦J | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2♦ | N | ♣K | = | 90 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 1NT | E | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 66% | 1NT | E | ♠4 | +4 | 210 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♠x | W | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 50% | ||||
| 18 | 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +4 | 210 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs HARRIS 1 : 3 VP (match 33159) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | HARRIS | |
| 17 | 4♥ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2♠ | W | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +4 | 230 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +4 | 230 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +4 | 230 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | E | +4 | 230 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs MARILL 1 : 3 VP (match 33160) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | MARILL | |
| 17 | 3♣ | E | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs PAUNCZ 0 : 4 VP (match 33161) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | PAUNCZ | |
| 17 | 3NT | E | ♦5 | = | 400 | 100% | 2NT | E | ♦2 | = | 120 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♦5 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 1NT | E | ♠5 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 95% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs ESTONIA 2 : 2 VP (match 33162) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | ESTONIA | |
| 17 | 4♥ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2♥ | S | ♥K | +2 | 170 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 1NT | E | ♠3 | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2♥ | W | ♠K | +4 | 230 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 94% | ||||
| 18 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +4 | 230 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs NEVER CLAIM 2 : 2 VP (match 33163) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | NEVER CLAIM | |
| 17 | 3♣ | E | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | E | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 110 | 73% | 1NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs AJ DIAMENT 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33164) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 17 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| 18 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs POLAND 1 : 3 VP (match 33165) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | POLAND | |
| 17 | 2♥ | N | ♣K | = | 110 | 63% | 3♥ | N | ♣K | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | ♠2 | +4 | 230 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♠8 | +4 | 230 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 79% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | E | +4 | 230 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | E | +4 | 230 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|