Round 8 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HARRIS | FRANCE SENIORS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | MARILL | DE KNIJFF | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PAUNCZ | NEMESIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | ESTONIA | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NEVER CLAIM | MORAN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | AJ DIAMENT | SALAMA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CUNEO | TALMAT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PACIFIC | NONAME TUR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | FORMIDABLES | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | YOUNG SWEDES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | MAROSAMITAWA | LATVIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | TESSIERES | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 15 | BRUNET | BELL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | NETHERLANDS RED | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NONAME | 21.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 10 | BRENO | 20.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 10 | YOUNG SWEDES | 20.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 12 | AJ DIAMENT | 20.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 12 | NEMESIS | 20.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 14 | NETHERLANDS RED | 19.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 14 | TESSIERES | 19.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 16 | DE KNIJFF | 19.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 17 | MAROSAMITAWA | 18.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 18 | MORAN | 18.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 18 | POLAND | 18.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 20 | CUNEO | 17.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 21 | BRUNET | 16.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 21 | FORMIDABLES | 16.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 21 | LUPO VELOCE | 16.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | FRANCE SENIORS | 16.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 24 | NEVER CLAIM | 16.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 24 | PAUNCZ | 16.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | TALMAT | 16.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 28 | NONAME TUR | 15.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 29 | LATVIA | 14.40 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 29 | PACIFIC | 14.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 31 | ESTONIA | 14.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 32 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 13.40 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 33 | SALAMA | 13.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 34 | BELL | 12.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 34 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 12.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 36 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 12.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 37 | HARRIS | 11.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 38 | MARILL | 9.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
HARRIS vs FRANCE SENIORS 1 : 3 VP (match 33022) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 15 | 3♦ | E | ♥Q | +2 | 150 | 52% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 2♥ | W | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 68% | 1NT | N | ♠4 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs DE KNIJFF 1 : 3 VP (match 33023) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | DE KNIJFF | |
| 15 | 4♦ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 150 | 52% | 4♦ | E | ♦3 | +1 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 2♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 110 | 56% | 2♠ | N | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs NEMESIS 2 : 2 VP (match 33024) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | NEMESIS | |
| 15 | 3NT | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 87% | 3♠ | S | ♣2 | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | N | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 53% | 1NT | W | ♦4 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | N | -2 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 33025) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | NONAME | |
| 15 | 3NT | E | ♥Q | = | 400 | 81% | 4♦ | E | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | W | ♦4 | +3 | 180 | 95% | 1NT | E | ♦6 | +3 | 180 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | E | +3 | 180 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs MORAN 1 : 3 VP (match 33026) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | MORAN | |
| 15 | 4♦ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 150 | 52% | 3♦ | W | ♠3 | +2 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 1NT | W | ♠9 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1NT | N | ♠5 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs SALAMA 4 : 0 VP (match 33027) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | SALAMA | |
| 15 | 3♠x | S | ♥6 | +1 | 930 | 100% | 5♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | N | ♠4 | = | 90 | 87% | 3♥ | W | ♦K | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♠x | S | +1 | 930 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 94% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 33028) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 15 | 4♦x | E | ♦8 | +1 | 610 | 100% | 4♣ | E | ♠K | +2 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | E | ♦2 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1NT | W | ♦A | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♦x | E | +1 | 610 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | +2 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs TALMAT 4 : 0 VP (match 33029) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | TALMAT | |
| 15 | 3♦ | E | ♥2 | +2 | 150 | 52% | 5♦ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 3♦ | N | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 53% | 1NT | W | ♦4 | +3 | 180 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 81% | ||||
| 16 | 3♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs NONAME TUR 2 : 2 VP (match 33086) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | NONAME TUR | |
| 15 | 3NT | E | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 87% | 4♦ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 150 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | W | ♦5 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1NT | N | ♠3 | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 33087) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | BRENO | |
| 15 | 4♠x | N | ♥3 | = | 790 | 97% | 3NT | E | ♥Q | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 2♥ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 56% | 1NTxx | N | ♠2 | = | 560 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♠x | N | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 81% | ||||
| 16 | 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 1NTxx | N | = | 560 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs YOUNG SWEDES 0 : 4 VP (match 33088) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 15 | 5♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 420 | 94% | 3NT | E | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | W | ♦3 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1NT | N | ♠4 | +1 | 120 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs LATVIA 4 : 0 VP (match 33089) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | LATVIA | |
| 15 | 3NT | E | ♥Q | = | 400 | 81% | 5♣ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 420 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 63% | 1NT | N | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 420 | 94% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | -2 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 33090) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 15 | 4♦ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 150 | 52% | 4♠x | N | ♠J | -1 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | W | ♦4 | +3 | 180 | 95% | 1NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33091) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 76% | Pass | — | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | Pass | — | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | 0 | 76% | ||||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | 0 | 73% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BELL 2 : 2 VP (match 33092) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BELL | |
| 15 | 5♦ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 81% | 3♦ | E | ♥Q | +2 | 150 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 1NT | N | ♠4 | = | 90 | 87% | 2♥ | W | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 52% | ||||
| 16 | 1NT | N | = | 90 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33093) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | BYE | |
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 76% | Pass | — | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | Pass | — | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | 0 | 76% | ||||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | 0 | 73% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|