Round 5 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESTONIA | FRANCE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | NEVER CLAIM | DE KNIJFF | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | AJ DIAMENT | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | POLAND | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CUNEO | MORAN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HARRIS | SALAMA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | MARILL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PAUNCZ | TALMAT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | MAROSAMITAWA | NONAME TUR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | TESSIERES | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BYE | YOUNG SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | BRUNET | LATVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | NETHERLANDS RED | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | FORMIDABLES | BELL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NONAME | 15.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 10 | POLAND | 14.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 11 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 13.40 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 11 | BRENO | 13.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 13 | MORAN | 13.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 14 | TESSIERES | 12.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | DE KNIJFF | 12.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 15 | LATVIA | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | LUPO VELOCE | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | NEMESIS | 12.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 15 | NETHERLANDS RED | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 20 | MAROSAMITAWA | 11.40 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 21 | ESTONIA | 11.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 21 | NEVER CLAIM | 11.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 21 | PAUNCZ | 11.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 24 | TALMAT | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 25 | YOUNG SWEDES | 9.40 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 26 | AJ DIAMENT | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 26 | CUNEO | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 26 | FORMIDABLES | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 26 | FRANCE SENIORS | 9.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 26 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 26 | SALAMA | 9.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 32 | NONAME TUR | 8.40 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 33 | PACIFIC | 8.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 34 | BELL | 6.40 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 34 | BRUNET | 6.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 36 | HARRIS | 6.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 37 | MARILL | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 38 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 4.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
ESTONIA vs FRANCE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 32998) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 6♥x | N | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♥ | N | ♠A | = | 1430 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 6♥x | N | -3 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs DE KNIJFF 1 : 3 VP (match 32999) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | DE KNIJFF | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 74% | 5♠x | E | ♣3 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♠A | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 33000) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | NEMESIS | |
| 9 | 5♥x | N | ♦5 | -2 | 300 | 81% | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 33001) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | NONAME | |
| 9 | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs MORAN 1 : 3 VP (match 33002) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | MORAN | |
| 9 | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 4♥ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 100% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs SALAMA 2 : 2 VP (match 33003) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | SALAMA | |
| 9 | 5♥ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 63% | 5♠ | E | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +1 | 650 | 81% | 7♥ | S | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 7♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 33004) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs TALMAT 2 : 2 VP (match 33005) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | TALMAT | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 6♥x | S | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +1 | 650 | 81% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 6♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs NONAME TUR 3 : 1 VP (match 33062) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | NONAME TUR | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 5♥x | N | ♠3 | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | ♠A | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♠3 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 33063) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | BRENO | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 74% | 5♠ | E | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs YOUNG SWEDES 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33064) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 9 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 53% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 53% | ||||
| 10 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs LATVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 33065) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | LATVIA | |
| 9 | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | ♠A | +2 | 680 | 60% | 5♥ | S | ♠2 | = | 650 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | S | = | 650 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 33066) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 9 | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 5♠ | W | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♥ | S | ♠2 | = | 1430 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 33067) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs BELL 3 : 1 VP (match 33068) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | BELL | |
| 9 | 5♥ | N | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 63% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33069) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BYE | |
| 9 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 53% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 53% | ||||
| 10 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|