Round 29 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 29 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MORAN | MAHAFFEY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SALAMA | NONAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NEMESIS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | TALMAT | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | FRANCE SENIORS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PAUNCZ | FRANCE JUNIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | ESTONIA | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | NEVER CLAIM | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AJ DIAMENT | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | POLAND | VINCIGUERRA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | LATVIA | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | LUPO VELOCE | YOUNG SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRENO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | BELL | DRACULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | EMERALD | NONAME TUR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | MAROSAMITAWA | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TESSIERES | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CONNECTOR | FORMIDABLES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BRUNET | PACIFIC | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | DE BOTTON | NETHERLANDS RED | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 29↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 29 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R29 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 72.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 2 | NONAME TUR | 70.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 3 | YOUNG SWEDES | 69.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 4 | TESSIERES | 68.40 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 5 | PAUNCZ | 68.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 6 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 66.80 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 6 | SALAMA | 66.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 8 | DE KNIJFF | 65.40 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 9 | FORMIDABLES | 64.80 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 9 | NEMESIS | 64.80 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 11 | DE BOTTON | 63.60 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 12 | EMERALD | 63.40 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 13 | ESTONIA | 63.00 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 14 | MAHAFFEY | 62.90 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 15 | DRACULA | 62.80 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 16 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 60.80 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 16 | LATVIA | 60.80 | 2.40 | 29 |
| 18 | LUPO VELOCE | 60.40 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 19 | AJ DIAMENT | 60.20 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 20 | MAROSAMITAWA | 59.80 | 2.40 | 29 |
| 21 | CONNECTOR | 59.40 | 1.00 | 13 |
| 22 | TALMAT | 59.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 23 | BRENO | 58.80 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 23 | MORAN | 58.80 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 25 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 57.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 25 | FRANCE SENIORS | 57.00 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 25 | NEVER CLAIM | 57.00 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 28 | CUNEO | 55.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 29 | NONAME | 54.60 | 2.00 | 29 |
| 30 | VINCIGUERRA | 52.80 | 1.00 | 13 |
| 31 | POLAND | 50.40 | 3.00 | 29 |
| 32 | MARILL | 49.80 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 33 | BELL | 48.40 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 33 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 48.40 | 1.00 | 29 |
| 35 | BRUNET | 47.40 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 36 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 45.80 | 0.00 | 29 |
| 36 | PACIFIC | 45.80 | 4.00 | 29 |
| 38 | HARRIS | 36.80 | 2.00 | 29 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 29 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R29 | BAM% |
|---|
MORAN vs MAHAFFEY 4 : 0 VP (match 33415) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MORAN | MAHAFFEY | |
| 25 | 5♦ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 69% | 5♣x | S | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 3NT | S | ♦2 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2NT | S | ♣5 | +1 | 150 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | +1 | 150 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SALAMA vs NONAME 2 : 2 VP (match 33416) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SALAMA | NONAME | |
| 25 | 5♠ | E | ♣10 | -4 | 400 | 90% | 5♦ | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | N | ♦6 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs NEMESIS 0 : 4 VP (match 33417) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | NEMESIS | |
| 25 | 3NT | W | ♣10 | +2 | 660 | 86% | 5♦ | W | ♠A | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♠8 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 3NT | S | ♣5 | = | 600 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 73% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TALMAT vs DE KNIJFF 2 : 2 VP (match 33418) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TALMAT | DE KNIJFF | |
| 25 | 3NT | W | ♠K | +2 | 660 | 86% | 4♣x | S | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | ♦6 | = | 620 | 97% | 2♠ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 54% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS BLUE vs FRANCE SENIORS 0 : 4 VP (match 33419) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS BLUE | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 25 | 5♦ | W | ♠K | = | 600 | 73% | 4♣x | S | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2♠ | S | ♣2 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs FRANCE JUNIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 33455) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | FRANCE JUNIORS | |
| 25 | 3NT | W | ♣10 | +1 | 630 | 78% | 6♣x | S | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♠8 | = | 110 | 78% | 2♠ | S | ♠4 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | S | -4 | 800 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 33456) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | MARILL | |
| 25 | 5♦ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 69% | 5♣x | N | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -4 | 800 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 33457) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | HARRIS | |
| 25 | 6♦ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 6♦ | E | ♠10 | -2 | 200 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♣4 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 3♠ | S | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 85% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 33458) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | CUNEO | |
| 25 | 5♦ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 5♣x | S | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 1NT | S | ♣J | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | S | -4 | 800 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs VINCIGUERRA 3 : 1 VP (match 33459) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | VINCIGUERRA | |
| 25 | 6♦ | E | ♠10 | -2 | 200 | 85% | 4♣x | S | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33495) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | BYE | |
| 25 | Pass | — | 0 | 53% | Pass | — | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 26 | Pass | — | 0 | 86% | Pass | — | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | Pass | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 53% | ||||||
| 26 | Pass | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 86% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs YOUNG SWEDES 2 : 2 VP (match 33496) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 25 | 6♣x | S | ♦A | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 6♦x | E | ♠10 | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 1NT | S | ♦6 | +3 | 180 | 92% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 150 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♣x | S | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6♦x | E | -2 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs BRENO 1 : 3 VP (match 33497) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | BRENO | |
| 25 | 5♦ | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 5♦ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 26 | 1NT | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2♠ | S | ♦7 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 26 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs DRACULA 0 : 4 VP (match 33498) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | DRACULA | |
| 25 | 4NT | W | ♣10 | +1 | 660 | 86% | 5♦ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♠8 | = | 110 | 78% | 2♠ | S | ♠6 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4NT | W | +1 | 660 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EMERALD vs NONAME TUR 2 : 2 VP (match 33499) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EMERALD | NONAME TUR | |
| 25 | 4NT | W | ♣10 | = | 630 | 78% | 4♣x | S | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♦2 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2♠ | S | ♠4 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4NT | W | = | 630 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33535) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | BYE | |
| 25 | Pass | — | 0 | 53% | Pass | — | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 26 | Pass | — | 0 | 86% | Pass | — | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | Pass | 0 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 53% | ||||||
| 26 | Pass | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 86% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 2 : 2 VP (match 33536) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 25 | 6NTx | W | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 85% | 6♦x | E | ♠10 | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♣5 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 1NT | S | ♦2 | +2 | 150 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6NTx | W | -1 | 200 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 6♦x | E | -2 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CONNECTOR vs FORMIDABLES 1 : 3 VP (match 33537) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CONNECTOR | FORMIDABLES | |
| 25 | 6♦ | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 5♥xx | E | ♦5 | -4 | 2200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 3♠ | S | ♠5 | = | 140 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♦6 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 6♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 5♥xx | E | -4 | 2200 | 100% | ||||
| 26 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs PACIFIC 0 : 4 VP (match 33538) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | PACIFIC | |
| 25 | 3NT | E | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 86% | 4♣x | N | ♥6 | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2♠ | N | ♦6 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE BOTTON vs NETHERLANDS RED 0 : 4 VP (match 33539) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE BOTTON | NETHERLANDS RED | |
| 25 | 5♣x | S | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 63% | 6♦x | E | ♠10 | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2♠ | S | ♣5 | +2 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♦x | E | -2 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| 26 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|