Round 18 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 18 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | NETHERLANDS RED | 2 | 2 | 2.50 | 2.20 | protocol → |
| 2 | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DE KNIJFF | FORMIDABLES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NEMESIS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | NONAME | MAROSAMITAWA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MORAN | TESSIERES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SALAMA | CONNECTOR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BRUNET | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TALMAT | DE BOTTON | 1 | 3 | 1.20 | 3.20 | protocol → |
| 10 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BYE | VINCIGUERRA | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | NONAME TUR | CUNEO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | DRACULA | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | BRENO | MARILL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | YOUNG SWEDES | PAUNCZ | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | LATVIA | ESTONIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | LUPO VELOCE | NEVER CLAIM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | AJ DIAMENT | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BELL | POLAND | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | EMERALD | FRANCE JUNIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 18↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 18 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R18 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TESSIERES | 46.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 1 | YOUNG SWEDES | 46.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 3 | NETHERLANDS RED | 44.60 | 2.20 | 18 |
| 4 | NONAME TUR | 42.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 5 | DRACULA | 41.40 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 6 | BRENO | 40.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 6 | MAROSAMITAWA | 40.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 6 | NEMESIS | 40.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 9 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 39.80 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 10 | MORAN | 39.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 11 | NONAME | 39.20 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 12 | EMERALD | 38.40 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 12 | FORMIDABLES | 38.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 12 | NEVER CLAIM | 38.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 12 | POLAND | 38.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 16 | MAHAFFEY | 38.30 | 2.50 | 2 |
| 17 | TALMAT | 37.60 | 1.20 | 18 |
| 18 | AJ DIAMENT | 37.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 18 | BRUNET | 37.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 18 | PAUNCZ | 37.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 18 | SALAMA | 37.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 22 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 36.80 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 23 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 36.60 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 23 | DE BOTTON | 36.60 | 3.20 | 2 |
| 25 | DE KNIJFF | 36.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 25 | LUPO VELOCE | 36.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 27 | VINCIGUERRA | 35.80 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 28 | CONNECTOR | 35.40 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 29 | LATVIA | 34.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 30 | ESTONIA | 33.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 30 | FRANCE SENIORS | 33.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 32 | BELL | 31.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 32 | CUNEO | 31.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 32 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 31.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 35 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 30.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 35 | PACIFIC | 30.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 37 | MARILL | 26.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 38 | HARRIS | 17.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 18 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R18 | BAM% |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs NETHERLANDS RED 2.5 : 2.2 VP (match 33245) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | NETHERLANDS RED | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 5♣x | W | ♦9 | -3 | 800 | 78% | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs PACIFIC 4 : 0 VP (match 33246) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | PACIFIC | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 5♣ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 58% | 3NT | E | ♠6 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DE KNIJFF vs FORMIDABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 33247) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DE KNIJFF | FORMIDABLES | |
| 3 | 3NT | N | ♦3 | +1 | 430 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 5♣x | E | ♦K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 6♣x | E | ♦K | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣x | E | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | E | -4 | 1100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 2 : 2 VP (match 33248) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 3 | 5♦x | W | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 97% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 600 | 74% | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 5♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME vs MAROSAMITAWA 0 : 4 VP (match 33249) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME | MAROSAMITAWA | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 4♠x | N | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MORAN vs TESSIERES 0 : 4 VP (match 33250) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MORAN | TESSIERES | |
| 3 | 6♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 100% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 3NT | E | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 6♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SALAMA vs CONNECTOR 4 : 0 VP (match 33251) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SALAMA | CONNECTOR | |
| 3 | 5♥x | S | ♣2 | = | 650 | 100% | 4♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 6♣x | W | ♦9 | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 4NT | E | ♠K | -2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 5♥x | S | = | 650 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 6♣x | W | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | -2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA LADIES TEAM vs BRUNET 1 : 3 VP (match 33252) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA LADIES TEAM | BRUNET | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♣9 | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠K | = | 600 | 74% | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -4 | 1100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TALMAT vs DE BOTTON 1.2 : 3.2 VP (match 33253) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TALMAT | DE BOTTON | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♠3 | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 5♦ | E | ♠10 | -5 | 500 | 67% | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 5♦ | E | -5 | 500 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS BLUE vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33254) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS BLUE | BYE | |
| 3 | Pass | — | 0 | 91% | Pass | — | 0 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 4 | Pass | — | 0 | 58% | Pass | — | 0 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | Pass | 0 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 91% | ||||||
| 4 | Pass | 0 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 58% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs VINCIGUERRA 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | VINCIGUERRA | |
| 3 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 91% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 58% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 91% | ||||
| 4 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME TUR vs CUNEO 4 : 0 VP (match 33326) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME TUR | CUNEO | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 6♦x | W | ♠K | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 5♣x | E | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 6♦x | W | -4 | 1100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRACULA vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 33327) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRACULA | HARRIS | |
| 3 | 4♥ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 76% | 6NT | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 5♣x | E | ♦2 | -3 | 800 | 78% | 6♦ | W | ♠K | -2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣x | E | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs MARILL 3 : 1 VP (match 33328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | MARILL | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 5♣xx | E | ♦A | -3 | 1600 | 100% | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣xx | E | -3 | 1600 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YOUNG SWEDES vs PAUNCZ 4 : 0 VP (match 33329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YOUNG SWEDES | PAUNCZ | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 3NT | W | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 5♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs ESTONIA 1 : 3 VP (match 33330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | ESTONIA | |
| 3 | 4♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | E | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 4NT | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | W | -2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs NEVER CLAIM 1 : 3 VP (match 33331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | NEVER CLAIM | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♣9 | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 5♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs AJ DIAMENT 3 : 1 VP (match 33332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 3 | 4♥ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♣9 | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 5♣ | E | ♥Q | -3 | 300 | 64% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 5♣ | E | -3 | 300 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs POLAND 1 : 3 VP (match 33333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | POLAND | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 74% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EMERALD vs FRANCE JUNIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 33334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EMERALD | FRANCE JUNIORS | |
| 3 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 74% | 3NT | W | ♥5 | +1 | 630 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 76% | ||||
| 4 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|