Round 21 — BAM TEAMS FINAL B
8 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 21 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BELL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | MARILL | BRUNET | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | POLAND | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PACIFIC | HARRIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRENO | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | NEMESIS | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 21↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 21 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R21 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LUPO VELOCE | 56.23 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 2 | BELL | 55.51 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 3 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 54.19 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 4 | POLAND | 52.23 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 5 | BRENO | 48.17 | 2.40 | 21 |
| 6 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 47.37 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | 47.11 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 8 | NONAME | 46.09 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 9 | NEMESIS | 45.10 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 10 | MARILL | 45.06 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 11 | PACIFIC | 42.74 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 12 | CUNEO | 41.26 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 13 | BRUNET | 40.54 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 14 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 39.40 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 15 | HARRIS | 37.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 21 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R21 | BAM% |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 34671) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 25 | 3♦ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 50% | 4♥ | W | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 5♥ | S | ♥2 | +1 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 50% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 34672) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 25 | 4♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 620 | 73% | 4♥ | W | ♠5 | = | 620 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 650 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs BRUNET 2 : 2 VP (match 34673) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | BRUNET | |
| 25 | 4♥x | E | ♠7 | = | 790 | 97% | 5♥x | W | ♣2 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 6♥ | S | ♣2 | = | 1430 | 93% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | +1 | 650 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥x | E | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 26 | 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 34674) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | NONAME | |
| 25 | 4♥ | W | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 80% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs HARRIS 2 : 2 VP (match 34675) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | HARRIS | |
| 25 | 4♥x | E | ♣Q | = | 790 | 97% | 3♦ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 6♥ | S | ♦A | = | 1430 | 93% | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥x | E | = | 790 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 50% | ||||
| 26 | 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 34676) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | BYE | |
| 25 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 26 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 63% | ||||
| 26 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs BLUE CHIP SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 34677) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | |
| 25 | 4♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 620 | 73% | 4NT | W | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +2 | 680 | 60% | 5♥ | S | ♥2 | +1 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | W | -1 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEMESIS vs CUNEO 2 : 2 VP (match 34678) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEMESIS | CUNEO | |
| 25 | 5♦x | E | ♣Q | -1 | 200 | 97% | 4♥ | E | ♣2 | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 77% | 6♥ | S | ♥6 | = | 1430 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 25 | 5♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 26 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|