LUO Zengqun · HIIMOTOR
vs par split: bidding -2.40 · play +0.35
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.09/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.29/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 72.7% · declarer play 80.0% · defence 83.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (1) | 80.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 83.3% (12) |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 87.5% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 57.1% (7) · ♦ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT -4.67 (6) · a suit -1.59 (34)
vs par by level: part-score -1.42 (19) · game -1.90 (20) · slam -17.00 (1)
By role: declaring -2.91/bd (-5.68 vs par · 22) · defending +0.50/bd (+2.39 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.17/bd (-1.90 vs par · 20) · not vulnerable -1.58/bd (-2.20 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | H.Zhang | X.Shi – B.Chen | Open | 10 | +3.6 | +0.36 | +1.70 |
| Round 4 | H.Zhang | Y.Guan – W.Wang | Open | 10 | -19.2 | -1.92 | -2.00 |
| Round 6 | H.Zhang | K.Wang – J.Peng | Open | 10 | -25.9 | -2.59 | -4.00 |
| Round 9 | H.Zhang | H.Yang – Y.Lu | Closed | 10 | -13.6 | -1.36 | -3.90 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.1 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 21 | 4♠x | ♦A | -1 | +11 |
| +5.9 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 12 | 4♠x | ♥Q | -1 | +12 |
| +5.7 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 20 | 4♠ | ♥10 | -1 | +12 |
| +5.1 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 18 | 2♠ | ♥10 | -2 | +3 |
| +3.1 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 16 | 3♦ | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 27 | 5♠ | ♥Q | -1 | +8 |
| +1.6 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 13 | 1NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 23 | 2♠ | ♣3 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 29 | 2♠ | ♦9 | +2 | -1 |
| +1.3 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 27 | 4♥ | ♣6 | -2 | +8 |
| +1.2 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 28 | 3♥ | ♦4 | -1 | +4 |
| +0.9 | Round 4 | JXBA | 6 | 2♥ | ♠7 | -1 | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 24 | 3♦ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round 4 | JXBA | 7 | 2♠ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 4 | JXBA | 3 | 4♥ | ♦7 | +2 | +11 |
| +0.4 | Round 4 | JXBA | 5 | 4♠ | ♥A | +1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 26 | 2♦ | ♥3 | = | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 4 | JXBA | 1 | 4♥ | ♠K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 17 | 3♠ | ♥2 | = | +7 |
| -0.3 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 21 | 3NT | ♦6 | -3 | -6 |
| -0.6 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 14 | 3♦ | ♥2 | = | -5 |
| -0.8 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 25 | 3NT | ♠3 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.9 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 22 | 2♥ | ♦J | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 4 | JXBA | 10 | 1NT | ♠3 | +1 | -1 |
| -1.7 | Round 4 | JXBA | 8 | 2♠ | ♣10 | -1 | -4 |
| -1.7 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 25 | 4♥ | ♦8 | +2 | -11 |
| -1.8 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 19 | 2♠ | ♣3 | = | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 30 | 4♠ | ♦Q | -1 | -10 |
| -1.9 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 24 | 3♥ | ♦5 | -2 | -5 |
| -3.2 | Round 4 | JXBA | 2 | 5♣ | ♥A | -1 | -3 |
| -4.4 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 23 | 5♦ | ♥9 | +1 | -14 |
| -4.8 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 22 | 3NT | ♣6 | -2 | -6 |
| -6.6 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 30 | 4♥ | ♣Q | -2 | -11 |
| -6.9 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 15 | 5♥ | ♠A | -1 | -6 |
| -7.8 | Round 4 | JXBA | 4 | 4♠ | ♠J | -2 | -13 |
| -7.8 | Round 4 | JXBA | 9 | 3♥x | ♠A | -2 | -11 |
| -8.2 | Round 2 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 11 | 5♦x | ♥8 | +1 | -6 |
| -9.6 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 28 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | -10 |
| -10.2 | Round 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI Mixed | 26 | 2♣ | ♠2 | +3 | -15 |
| -12.6 | Round 6 | HENGZHOU FINANCE | 29 | 7♠ | ♦J | -1 | -17 |