GAN Derun · SANMING EDUCATION

44rank
+15.1Butler · 20 bds
+0.76per board
±3.3swing
-2.25vs par /bd
+0.00adjusted /bd
Butler per round: 12.7 2.4by round

vs par split: bidding -1.63 · play -0.89

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.75/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.00/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 57.1% · defence 71.4%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·66.7% (3)
Declarer play66.7% (3)50.0% (4)
Defence0.0% (1)83.3% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 50.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT -5.80 (5) · a suit -1.36 (14)

vs par by level: part-score -1.10 (10) · game -2.57 (7) · slam -9.50 (2)

By role: declaring +1.19/bd (-4.46 vs par · 13) · defending -0.06/bd (+1.86 vs par · 7)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.24/bd (-1.90 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +0.27/bd (-2.60 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 9L.HeK.Bercuson – G.MittelmanClosed10+12.7+1.27-2.90
Round 10L.HeM.Vanuzzi – P.UggeriOpen10+2.4+0.24-1.60

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+7.7Round 9CANADA Seniors236♦♥9=-8
+7.4Round 9CANADA Seniors303NT♦J=-1
+4.8Round 10ITALY Mixed64♠♣10-2+8
+3.4Round 9CANADA Seniors292♥♠Q-1+1
+3.1Round 10ITALY Mixed73NT♠K=+0
+2.7Round 10ITALY Mixed24♠♥A=+3
+2.1Round 9CANADA Seniors213♠♦A=+7
+1.4Round 9CANADA Seniors263NT♠5+3-12
+1.0Round 10ITALY Mixed43♠♥5-1-1
+0.2Round 10ITALY Mixed33♣♦10+2-6
-0.0Round 10ITALY Mixed86NT♣7=-11
-0.1Round 9CANADA Seniors242♥♠2-1-4
-0.6Round 9CANADA Seniors273♠♥A+1+6
-1.3Round 10ITALY Mixed102♠♥4=+0
-1.4Round 10ITALY Mixed9Pass+3
-1.7Round 9CANADA Seniors254♥♦4+2-11
-2.7Round 10ITALY Mixed11NT♦10+1-5
-3.2Round 9CANADA Seniors225♦♣A-1-5
-3.7Round 9CANADA Seniors283♥♣10=-2
-4.0Round 10ITALY Mixed52♠♣A-2-7