DZIALECKA Natalia · AZS UW PTC PIAST
vs par split: bidding +3.10 · play +1.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.99/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.69/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · defence 75.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 24.0% (6/25)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (4) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 71.4% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +13.00 (1) · a suit +3.22 (9)
vs par by level: part-score +2.43 (7) · game +8.33 (3)
By role: declaring +1.85/bd (+2.50 vs par · 2) · defending +2.89/bd (+4.62 vs par · 8)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +3.56/bd (+5.80 vs par · 5) · not vulnerable +1.80/bd (+2.60 vs par · 5)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | N.Berut | A.Gorwa – W.Glura-Karasiewicz | Closed | 10 | +26.8 | +2.68 | +4.20 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.