Wroclaw 2024 — U26 Teams

📅 13 - 18 July 2024 · Wroclaw, Poland

3 / 3 rounds played

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cumulative Victory Points. The medalists (top 3) are highlighted. Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.

Standings after round 3
Place	Team	VP	C/O	R1	R2	R3
1	HELLAS U26	41.78	1.00	12.03	10.31	18.44
2	SKAFFATAR	39.17	2.00	7.97	12.03	17.17
3	FRANCE U26	24.91	3.00	9.39	9.69	2.83
4	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	20.14	·	10.61	7.97	1.56

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

Each cell is the row team’s VP against the column team (columns numbered by rank; # place, Σ total VP). Hover a cell to highlight both teams and their two head-to-head results; click a score for that match’s protocol.

#	Team	Σ	1	2	3	4
1	HELLAS U26	41.78		12.03	10.31	18.44
2	SKAFFATAR	39.17	7.97		17.17	12.03
3	FRANCE U26	24.91	9.69	2.83		9.39
4	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	20.14	1.56	7.97	10.61

1 HELLAS U26 · 2 SKAFFATAR · 3 FRANCE U26 · 4 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
C/O	Carry-over (handicap)			3.00
1	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	41	43	9.39	10.61	protocol →
	Open NSM.Fragola – N.Tabata -11.4 / 16 bdClosed EWR.Guth – L.Bellicaud +10.6 / 16 bd
2	HELLAS U26	21	22	9.69	10.31	protocol →
	Open EWM.Fragola – N.Tabata -1.0 / 16 bdClosed NSR.Guth – L.Bellicaud +6.8 / 16 bd
3	SKAFFATAR	19	52	2.83	17.17	protocol →
	Open NSR.Guth – L.Bellicaud -21.6 / 16 bdClosed EWN.Tabata – M.Fragola -20.8 / 16 bd
Total VP	24.91

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
C/O	Carry-over (handicap)			1.00
1	SKAFFATAR	41	34	12.03	7.97	protocol →
	Open EWI.Papaspyrou – M.Soumplis -7.3 / 16 bdClosed NSI.Pollatou – P.Skordas +14.5 / 16 bd
2	FRANCE U26	22	21	10.31	9.69	protocol →
	Open NSD.Kapiris – I.Papaspyrou +1.0 / 16 bdClosed EWP.Skordas – I.Pollatou -6.8 / 16 bd
3	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	48	5	18.44	1.56	protocol →
	Open NSD.Kapiris – P.Skordas +30.3 / 16 bdClosed EWM.Soumplis – I.Papaspyrou +29.2 / 16 bd
Total VP	41.78

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
C/O	Carry-over (handicap)			2.00
1	HELLAS U26	34	41	7.97	12.03	protocol →
	Open NSR.Goor – X.Friesen +7.3 / 16 bdClosed EWO.Nijssen – T.Van De Paverd -14.5 / 16 bd
2	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	43	36	12.03	7.97	protocol →
	Open EWX.Friesen – R.Goor +8.1 / 16 bdClosed NST.Van De Paverd – O.Nijssen +0.8 / 16 bd
3	FRANCE U26	52	19	17.17	2.83	protocol →
	Open EWX.Friesen – R.Goor +21.6 / 16 bdClosed NST.Van De Paverd – O.Nijssen +20.8 / 16 bd
Total VP	39.17

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	FRANCE U26	43	41	10.61	9.39	protocol →
	Open EWF.Kolesnik – J.Patreuha +11.4 / 16 bdClosed NSA.Abragi – L.Rombaut -10.6 / 16 bd
2	SKAFFATAR	36	43	7.97	12.03	protocol →
	Open NSC.Lahrmann – N.Heiberg-Evenstad -8.1 / 16 bdClosed EWF.Kolesnik – J.Patreuha -0.8 / 16 bd
3	HELLAS U26	5	48	1.56	18.44	protocol →
	Open EWC.Lahrmann – N.Heiberg-Evenstad -30.3 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Patreuha – L.Rombaut -29.2 / 16 bd
Total VP	20.14

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	R1	R2	R3
1	D.Kapiris	HELLAS U26	32	+31.3	+0.98	·	+1.0	+30.3
2	P.Skordas	HELLAS U26	48	+38.0	+0.79	+14.5	-6.8	+30.3
3	X.Friesen	SKAFFATAR	48	+37.0	+0.77	+7.3	+8.1	+21.6
3	R.Goor	SKAFFATAR	48	+37.0	+0.77	+7.3	+8.1	+21.6
5	M.Soumplis	HELLAS U26	32	+21.9	+0.68	-7.3	·	+29.2
6	I.Papaspyrou	HELLAS U26	48	+22.9	+0.48	-7.3	+1.0	+29.2
7	F.Kolesnik	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	32	+10.6	+0.33	+11.4	-0.8	·
8	I.Pollatou	HELLAS U26	32	+7.7	+0.24	+14.5	-6.8	·
9	O.Nijssen	SKAFFATAR	48	+7.1	+0.15	-14.5	+0.8	+20.8
9	T.Van De Paverd	SKAFFATAR	48	+7.1	+0.15	-14.5	+0.8	+20.8
11	L.Bellicaud	FRANCE U26	48	-4.2	-0.09	+10.6	+6.8	-21.6
11	R.Guth	FRANCE U26	48	-4.2	-0.09	+10.6	+6.8	-21.6
13	J.Patreuha	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	48	-18.6	-0.39	+11.4	-0.8	-29.2
14	A.Abragi	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	16	-10.6	-0.66	-10.6	·	·
15	M.Fragola	FRANCE U26	48	-33.2	-0.69	-11.4	-1.0	-20.8
15	N.Tabata	FRANCE U26	48	-33.2	-0.69	-11.4	-1.0	-20.8
17	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	32	-38.4	-1.20	·	-8.1	-30.3
17	C.Lahrmann	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	32	-38.4	-1.20	·	-8.1	-30.3
19	L.Rombaut	TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE	32	-39.8	-1.24	-10.6	·	-29.2

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	D.Kapiris	+1.34
2	O.Nijssen	+0.96
2	T.Van De Paverd	+0.96
4	M.Soumplis	+0.88
5	L.Bellicaud	+0.81
5	R.Guth	+0.81
7	F.Kolesnik	+0.78
8	I.Papaspyrou	+0.73
9	J.Patreuha	+0.27
10	P.Skordas	+0.15
11	X.Friesen	-0.27
11	R.Goor	-0.27
1	D.Kapiris	+1.34
2	O.Nijssen	+0.96
2	T.Van De Paverd	+0.96
4	M.Soumplis	+0.88
5	L.Bellicaud	+0.81
5	R.Guth	+0.81
7	F.Kolesnik	+0.78
8	I.Papaspyrou	+0.73
9	J.Patreuha	+0.27
10	P.Skordas	+0.15
11	X.Friesen	-0.27
11	R.Goor	-0.27
13	I.Pollatou	-0.91
14	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	-1.09
14	C.Lahrmann	-1.09
16	L.Rombaut	-1.22
17	M.Fragola	-1.35
17	N.Tabata	-1.35
19	A.Abragi	-1.69

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	N.Tabata	100.0%
1	L.Rombaut	100.0%
3	R.Guth	93.8%
4	F.Kolesnik	88.9%
5	J.Patreuha	85.7%
6	O.Nijssen	83.3%
7	D.Kapiris	81.8%
7	R.Goor	81.8%
9	M.Fragola	80.0%
10	L.Bellicaud	80.0%
10	C.Lahrmann	80.0%
12	I.Papaspyrou	77.8%
1	N.Tabata	100.0%
1	L.Rombaut	100.0%
3	R.Guth	93.8%
4	F.Kolesnik	88.9%
5	J.Patreuha	85.7%
6	O.Nijssen	83.3%
7	D.Kapiris	81.8%
7	R.Goor	81.8%
9	M.Fragola	80.0%
10	L.Bellicaud	80.0%
10	C.Lahrmann	80.0%
12	I.Papaspyrou	77.8%
13	T.Van De Paverd	77.8%
14	P.Skordas	76.9%
15	X.Friesen	75.0%
15	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	75.0%
17	I.Pollatou	57.1%
18	M.Soumplis	54.5%
19	A.Abragi	100.0%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	I.Papaspyrou	100.0%
1	R.Guth	100.0%
1	C.Lahrmann	100.0%
4	X.Friesen	92.3%
5	F.Kolesnik	85.7%
5	O.Nijssen	85.7%
7	N.Tabata	83.3%
8	M.Soumplis	80.0%
9	L.Bellicaud	75.0%
10	R.Goor	75.0%
11	T.Van De Paverd	72.7%
12	P.Skordas	69.2%
1	I.Papaspyrou	100.0%
1	R.Guth	100.0%
1	C.Lahrmann	100.0%
4	X.Friesen	92.3%
5	F.Kolesnik	85.7%
5	O.Nijssen	85.7%
7	N.Tabata	83.3%
8	M.Soumplis	80.0%
9	L.Bellicaud	75.0%
10	R.Goor	75.0%
11	T.Van De Paverd	72.7%
12	P.Skordas	69.2%
13	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	66.7%
14	M.Fragola	63.6%
15	L.Rombaut	62.5%
16	I.Pollatou	62.5%
17	D.Kapiris	60.0%
18	J.Patreuha	58.3%
19	A.Abragi	75.0%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	L.Bellicaud	96.2%
1	R.Guth	96.2%
3	D.Kapiris	94.7%
4	M.Fragola	89.5%
4	N.Tabata	89.5%
6	X.Friesen	89.5%
6	R.Goor	89.5%
8	P.Skordas	88.5%
8	J.Patreuha	88.5%
10	M.Soumplis	88.2%
11	I.Papaspyrou	88.0%
12	L.Rombaut	87.5%
1	L.Bellicaud	96.2%
1	R.Guth	96.2%
3	D.Kapiris	94.7%
4	M.Fragola	89.5%
4	N.Tabata	89.5%
6	X.Friesen	89.5%
6	R.Goor	89.5%
8	P.Skordas	88.5%
8	J.Patreuha	88.5%
10	M.Soumplis	88.2%
11	I.Papaspyrou	88.0%
12	L.Rombaut	87.5%
13	F.Kolesnik	82.4%
14	I.Pollatou	80.0%
15	O.Nijssen	80.0%
15	T.Van De Paverd	80.0%
17	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	71.4%
17	C.Lahrmann	71.4%
19	A.Abragi	71.4%

Bidding activityfull table →

#	Player	active
1	C.Lahrmann	58.2%
2	N.Tabata	52.6%
3	X.Friesen	51.1%
4	R.Goor	50.8%
5	M.Fragola	50.0%
6	J.Patreuha	46.0%
7	L.Rombaut	46.0%
8	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	45.6%
9	T.Van De Paverd	44.7%
10	M.Soumplis	44.3%
11	R.Guth	43.5%
12	I.Papaspyrou	41.0%
1	C.Lahrmann	58.2%
2	N.Tabata	52.6%
3	X.Friesen	51.1%
4	R.Goor	50.8%
5	M.Fragola	50.0%
6	J.Patreuha	46.0%
7	L.Rombaut	46.0%
8	N.Heiberg-Evenstad	45.6%
9	T.Van De Paverd	44.7%
10	M.Soumplis	44.3%
11	R.Guth	43.5%
12	I.Papaspyrou	41.0%
13	L.Bellicaud	40.4%
14	F.Kolesnik	40.2%
15	P.Skordas	40.1%
16	D.Kapiris	39.6%
17	I.Pollatou	39.1%
18	O.Nijssen	35.7%
19	A.Abragi	51.2%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Round 2 · Bd 32	4	20.3	3NT +300 HELLAS U26 (+7.3)	4♥ +620 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+13.0)
Round 1 · Bd 7	4	20.0	4♠ +200 SKAFFATAR (+8.3)	3NT +600 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+11.7)
Round 3 · Bd 2	4	18.6	5♥ +650 FRANCE U26 (+7.3)	5♥ +100 HELLAS U26 (+11.3)
Round 2 · Bd 22	4	18.3	5♦ +100 FRANCE U26 (+10.0)	5♣ +600 FRANCE U26 (+8.3)
Round 1 · Bd 10	4	18.0	4♥x +500 HELLAS U26 (+9.3)	2♠ +140 FRANCE U26 (+8.7)
Round 1 · Bd 13	4	17.4	6♣ +1370 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+8.7)	5♣ -620 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+8.7)
Round 2 · Bd 23	4	17.3	4♥ +200 HELLAS U26 (+11.0)	4♠x +500 SKAFFATAR (+6.3)
Round 3 · Bd 13	4	17.3	4♥ +100 HELLAS U26 (+10.0)	4♥ +620 SKAFFATAR (+7.3)
Round 3 · Bd 16	4	17.3	3NT +100 HELLAS U26 (+10.0)	3NT +600 SKAFFATAR (+7.3)
Round 2 · Bd 18	4	16.7	3♣x +500 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+7.0)	4♥ +100 HELLAS U26 (+9.7)
Round 1 · Bd 8	4	16.0	4♠ +450 SKAFFATAR (+8.7)	6♠ +100 TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE (+7.3)
Round 1 · Bd 16	4	16.0	5♥x +650 HELLAS U26 (+6.7)	3♠ -100 FRANCE U26 (+9.3)
Round 1 · Bd 11	4	15.7	2♠ +170 FRANCE U26 (+4.7)	3NT +400 HELLAS U26 (+11.0)
Round 2 · Bd 17	4	15.3	6♣ +100 SKAFFATAR (+11.0)	3NT +460 SKAFFATAR (+4.3)

Tables

Rounds

Wroclaw 2024 — U26 Teams

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

FRANCE U26 — results↑ top

HELLAS U26 — results↑ top

SKAFFATAR — results↑ top

TEAM FUNBRIDGE BLUE — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top