SHOR Yoav · THE VIKINGS
vs par split: bidding +3.04 · play -0.54
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.13/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.74/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 87.5% · defence 83.3%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 46.7% (28/60)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 66.7% (3) | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 88.9% (9) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 33.3% (3) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.00 (6) · a suit +3.67 (18)
vs par by level: part-score +4.64 (14) · game +0.56 (9) · slam -10.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.79/bd (+0.00 vs par · 12) · defending +1.44/bd (+5.00 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +2.70/bd (+3.50 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +0.84/bd (+1.79 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | M.Nordqvist | Z.Fan – S.Dai | Open | 8 | +21.9 | +2.74 | +2.75 |
| Round 2 | M.Nordqvist | K.Keska – M.Schroder | Open | 8 | +11.1 | +1.39 | +3.50 |
| Round 3 | M.Nordqvist | Z.Zabradi – G.Szabo | Open | 8 | +5.8 | +0.72 | +1.25 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.3 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 25 | 2NTx | ♥A | -4 | +5 |
| +6.4 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 28 | 5♣ | ♥5 | -1 | +12 |
| +4.8 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 12 | 5♣ | ♠J | = | -2 |
| +4.3 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 2 | 3♥ | ♠6 | = | +1 |
| +4.3 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 13 | 4♠ | ♣3 | = | +10 |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 4 | 4♦ | ♥A | +3 | +15 |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 7 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +6 |
| +3.0 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 27 | 2NT | ♥A | +1 | +1 |
| +2.9 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 22 | 3♦ | ♣Q | -2 | +0 |
| +2.8 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 21 | 4♠ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +2.5 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 6 | 2NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 24 | 2♥ | ♠T | +3 | +6 |
| +2.2 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 5 | 2NT | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 16 | 4♠ | ♥T | = | +0 |
| +1.9 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 1 | 2♠ | ♣7 | +4 | +5 |
| +1.4 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 3 | 2♠ | ♣Q | = | +11 |
| +1.0 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 26 | 3♦ | ♥5 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 18 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -11 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 17 | 3♠ | ♥T | -2 | +5 |
| -1.2 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 14 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | +8 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 15 | 4♠ | ♦9 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round 3 | CZE HUN | 11 | 1NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -6.9 | Round 1 | BRIDGE SCHOOL TEAM1 | 23 | 3NT | ♠T | = | -12 |
| -8.0 | Round 2 | KLUB LOGICZNY 1 | 8 | 7♦ | ♥K | -1 | -10 |