NEHMERT Pony Beate · REASON
vs par split: bidding +1.38 · play +0.78
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.13/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.11/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 87.5% #101 of 289 · declarer play 90.9% #31 of 289 · defence 73.7% #274 of 289
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 85.7% (7) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (5) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 66.7% (6) | 76.9% (13) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 0.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +4.00 (16) · a suit +0.92 (24)
vs par by level: part-score +2.29 (17) · game +1.68 (19) · slam +3.75 (4)
By role: declaring +1.72/bd (+0.48 vs par · 21) · defending +0.16/bd (+4.00 vs par · 19)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.08/bd (+2.30 vs par · 20) · not vulnerable +0.88/bd (+2.00 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 | A.Wildavsky | E.Erichsen – H.Erichsen | Open | 10 | +29.8 | +2.98 | +4.60 |
| Round 5 | A.Wildavsky | M.Gronkvist – I.Gronkvist | Open | 10 | -2.9 | -0.29 | +0.80 |
| Round 9 | A.Wildavsky | O.Svendsen – M.Harding | Open | 10 | +15.0 | +1.50 | +2.20 |
| Round 10 | A.Wildavsky | A.Maduzia – M.Dobrowolski | Open | 10 | -2.7 | -0.27 | +1.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.7 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 12 | 3NT | ♠J | = | +11 |
| +10.3 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 28 | 6NT | ♣Q | -1 | +14 |
| +8.8 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 25 | 4♥ | ♠5 | +2 | +11 |
| +7.2 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 21 | 1NT | ♦9 | +1 | +9 |
| +6.6 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 24 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +5.7 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 21 | 3NT | ♥Q | -3 | +11 |
| +5.0 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 29 | 1NT | ♥5 | +3 | +9 |
| +4.2 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 23 | 2♥ | ♦2 | -1 | +11 |
| +3.7 | Round 5 | WILSON | 9 | 3♠ | ♣4 | +1 | +8 |
| +3.4 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 26 | 3NT | ♣4 | +1 | +1 |
| +3.3 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 11 | 1NT | ♠4 | = | +5 |
| +3.2 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 14 | 6NT | ♣7 | +1 | +1 |
| +3.1 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 28 | 4♥ | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +3.0 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 27 | 1NT | ♠5 | -1 | +9 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | WILSON | 3 | 4♠ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 20 | 3NT | ♠9 | +3 | +1 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | WILSON | 4 | 3♦ | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| +1.5 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 17 | 3♣ | ♦A | +1 | +7 |
| +1.0 | Round 5 | WILSON | 8 | 4♥ | ♦3 | -1 | +5 |
| +0.9 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 26 | 4♠ | ♣5 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.5 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 15 | 2♠ | ♥7 | +2 | -10 |
| +0.5 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 30 | 3NT | ♠8 | = | +3 |
| -0.3 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 25 | 4♥ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| -0.5 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 18 | 3♣ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | WILSON | 2 | 5♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 13 | 3NT | ♥5 | +3 | -1 |
| -0.7 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 24 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | +1 |
| -0.9 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 19 | 2♥ | ♥2 | +2 | +10 |
| -1.0 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 30 | 4♣ | ♣Q | +1 | -4 |
| -1.2 | Round 5 | WILSON | 1 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 5 | WILSON | 5 | 1♠ | ♥A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 5 | WILSON | 6 | 5♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +3 |
| -2.1 | Round 5 | WILSON | 10 | 3NT | ♠9 | +2 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 27 | 4♥ | ♠J | -1 | -10 |
| -4.2 | Round 5 | WILSON | 7 | 1♣x | ♣3 | -1 | -8 |
| -4.2 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 22 | 3NT | ♣10 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.2 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 29 | 1NT | ♣8 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.3 | Round 9 | GILLIS | 16 | 3♥ | ♦3 | +1 | -2 |
| -8.0 | Round 4 | NEW AMSTERDAM | 22 | 6♣ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -9.9 | Round 10 | TECZA SZCZECINEK | 23 | 7♥ | ♠6 | = | +0 |