RODZIEWICZ-BIELEWICZ Ewa · FEPANANDRA
vs par split: bidding +0.82 · play +0.54
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.00/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.24/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.9% · declarer play 80.0% · defence 94.1%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (7) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (2) |
| Defence | 85.7% (7) | 100.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 100.0% (7) · ♣ 0.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.36 (11) · a suit +3.12 (17)
vs par by level: part-score +1.10 (10) · game +0.20 (15) · slam +8.00 (3)
By role: declaring -0.26/bd (-1.73 vs par · 11) · defending +0.56/bd (+3.35 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.52/bd (+2.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -0.05/bd (+0.57 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 32 | O.Rodziewicz-Bielewicz | M.Rimstedt – I.Gronkvist | Closed | 14 | -0.3 | -0.02 | +0.14 |
| Round of 32 | O.Rodziewicz-Bielewicz | M.Rimstedt – S.Buus Thomsen | Open | 14 | +6.9 | +0.49 | +2.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.1 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 25 | 6♠ | ♥A | -1 | +11 |
| +9.3 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 9 | 4♠x | ♥A | -1 | +13 |
| +5.3 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 23 | 3♠ | ♠8 | +1 | +10 |
| +5.2 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 12 | 1NT | ♥J | -2 | +0 |
| +5.2 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 16 | 4♠ | ♣3 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.6 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 3 | 4♥ | ♠K | -2 | +9 |
| +4.5 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 2 | 5♦ | ♥A | +1 | +0 |
| +2.9 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 22 | 4♥ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 18 | 3♠ | ♠5 | = | +6 |
| +1.8 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 28 | 4♦ | ♥4 | -3 | -3 |
| +1.6 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 4 | 1NT | ♣6 | = | +11 |
| +1.5 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 11 | 5♣x | ♠A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 27 | 3NT | ♠4 | = | -1 |
| +0.4 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 1 | 4♥ | ♠7 | -2 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 10 | 2NT | ♠A | = | +10 |
| -0.5 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 24 | 3NT | ♠8 | +2 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 17 | 2♠ | ♣2 | -1 | -4 |
| -1.3 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 20 | 4NT | ♥6 | = | +1 |
| -1.4 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 14 | 3NT | ♥5 | -1 | -10 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 13 | 3♠ | ♥10 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.2 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 6 | 1NT | ♣3 | = | -5 |
| -3.4 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 19 | 6♣ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 21 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | -3 |
| -5.0 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 15 | 6♥ | ♠9 | = | +13 |
| -5.2 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 5 | 3NT | ♥7 | -3 | -5 |
| -6.9 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 8 | 3NT | ♠J | +1 | -7 |
| -6.9 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 26 | 5♣x | ♥6 | = | -4 |
| -8.7 | Round of 32 | WILSON | 7 | 2NT | ♦10 | +3 | -9 |