PEPIC Selena · CZERBIA
vs par split: bidding -1.93 · play -1.36
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.71/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.15/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · declarer play 75.0% · defence 73.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 75.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | · | 75.0% (4) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 70.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.56 (9) · a suit -4.58 (19)
vs par by level: part-score -3.67 (9) · game -1.40 (15) · slam -9.50 (4)
By role: declaring -2.41/bd (-7.23 vs par · 13) · defending -1.39/bd (+0.13 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -4.26/bd (-8.21 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable +0.54/bd (+1.64 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 32 | E.Klems | J.Zmuda – M.Klukowski | Open | 14 | -25.8 | -1.84 | -2.14 |
| Round of 32 | E.Klems | K.Dufrat – P.Zatorski | Closed | 14 | -26.4 | -1.89 | -4.43 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.1 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 22 | 5♥ | ♠6 | -1 | +12 |
| +5.6 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 15 | 6♥ | ♠9 | +1 | -13 |
| +5.2 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 5 | 3NT | ♥7 | -3 | +5 |
| +3.4 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 19 | 6♣ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 14 | 3NT | ♥4 | -1 | +10 |
| +1.3 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 25 | 4♠ | ♥8 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 17 | 3♠ | ♣2 | -1 | +4 |
| +0.8 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 16 | 2♠ | ♥8 | +3 | -5 |
| +0.5 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 24 | 4♠ | ♥8 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 10 | 2NT | ♠8 | = | -10 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 1 | 4♥ | ♣3 | -2 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 12 | 2NT | ♠Q | -1 | +5 |
| -0.7 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 4 | 1NT | ♣4 | +1 | -10 |
| -1.3 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 7 | 3NT | ♦10 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 6 | 1NT | ♣3 | -1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 18 | 2♠ | ♥A | +1 | -6 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 27 | 3NT | ♠10 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.1 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 13 | 2♠ | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 8 | 3NT | ♥10 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.0 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 2 | 5♦ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| -4.6 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 3 | 4♥ | ♠K | -2 | -9 |
| -5.1 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 11 | 4♠ | ♠2 | +1 | -4 |
| -6.9 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 28 | 4♠x | ♥Q | = | -5 |
| -7.6 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 9 | 4♠ | ♣10 | -1 | -13 |
| -7.9 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 26 | 3♥ | ♠A | -1 | -11 |
| -8.5 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 21 | 6♠ | ♣4 | -1 | -12 |
| -9.7 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 23 | 4♠ | ♣K | -1 | -13 |
| -11.2 | Round of 32 | EDMONDS | 20 | 6♥ | ♣Q | -1 | -13 |