TUSZYNSKI Piotr · ZIMMERMANN
vs par split: bidding -0.48 · play -0.33
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.05/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · declarer play 83.3% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | · | 83.3% (12) |
| Defence | 57.1% (7) | 72.7% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.50 (8) · a suit -1.12 (34)
vs par by level: part-score -0.06 (17) · game -2.00 (23) · slam +6.50 (2)
By role: declaring -0.06/bd (-2.58 vs par · 24) · defending -0.26/bd (+1.56 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.65/bd (-0.14 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.95/bd (-1.48 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | P.Gawrys | D.Berkowitz – J.Meckstroth | Closed | 14 | -2.4 | -0.17 | +0.29 |
| Semifinal | P.Gawrys | D.Berkowitz – J.Meckstroth | Closed | 14 | +18.1 | +1.29 | +0.86 |
| Semifinal | P.Gawrys | D.Berkowitz – J.Meckstroth | Closed | 14 | -21.9 | -1.56 | -3.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 13 | 6♠ | ♣10 | +1 | +13 |
| +8.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 38 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +10 |
| +5.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 9 | 6♥x | ♥3 | -4 | +0 |
| +5.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 32 | 2♦ | ♣2 | +2 | +9 |
| +4.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 47 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +2 | +6 |
| +4.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 4 | 3♠ | ♦K | +1 | +10 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 30 | 5♦ | ♠3 | +1 | -11 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 40 | 3♣ | ♣3 | = | +6 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 42 | 3NT | ♥6 | -2 | +11 |
| +2.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 39 | 3♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 36 | 2♠ | ♥J | -1 | +1 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 50 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 6 | 3NT | ♠10 | +3 | -13 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 14 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | -6 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 43 | 4♥ | ♠A | -2 | -6 |
| -0.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 8 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 29 | 5♦x | ♠A | -1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 56 | 4♥ | ♣10 | = | +0 |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 46 | 3♦ | ♣K | -1 | -7 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 2 | 3♠ | ♦5 | = | +8 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 10 | 3NT | ♥J | +1 | +12 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 33 | 3NT | ♥6 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 37 | 3NT | ♥J | +2 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 51 | 3NT | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 3 | 4♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -1.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 41 | 4♥ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 31 | 1NT | ♥7 | -1 | -3 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 34 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 48 | 3♣ | ♦5 | -1 | -12 |
| -2.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 44 | 1NT | ♥6 | -1 | -3 |
| -2.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 45 | 5♦ | ♥A | -1 | -10 |
| -3.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 55 | 2♠ | ♦J | -2 | +0 |
| -3.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 54 | 4♥ | ♣J | = | +0 |
| -3.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 35 | 2♠ | ♦2 | = | -6 |
| -4.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 52 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | +2 |
| -4.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 53 | 4♠ | ♦5 | -1 | -12 |
| -5.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 5 | 4♠ | ♠8 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.0 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 7 | 4♥ | ♣A | -3 | -9 |
| -5.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 49 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | -8 |
| -6.3 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 1 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +2 | -6 |
| -7.7 | Semifinal | GOODMAN | 12 | 5♦ | ♠2 | +1 | -1 |