ROGOWSKI Jan · SZENBERG
3rank
+16.1Butler · 12 bds
+1.34per board
±5.4swing
+1.96adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.62/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.96/bd
By role: declaring +0.86/bd (11) · defending +6.60/bd (1)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +1.34/bd (12)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QS | J.Pochron | R.Ramer – N.Klaver | Open | 12 | +16.1 | +1.34 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.4 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 17 | 6♠ | ♥A | = | · |
| +8.3 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 18 | 5♣x | ♠A | -2 | · |
| +6.6 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 20 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | · |
| +6.4 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 19 | 5♦ | ♠8 | = | · |
| +2.3 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 16 | 3♠ | ♦Q | = | · |
| +2.1 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 23 | 4♥ | ♣Q | -2 | · |
| +1.3 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 24 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | · |
| -0.6 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 21 | 3♥ | ♦K | -1 | · |
| -2.4 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 25 | 3N | ♠3 | -2 | · |
| -4.1 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 22 | 2♠ | ♦J | +2 | · |
| -4.6 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 15 | 4♥ | ♦7 | +2 | · |
| -8.6 | QS | NETHERLANDS 1 | 26 | 3N | ♠7 | -2 | · |