LASUT Henky · INDONESIA
7rank
+12.3Butler · 24 bds
+0.51per board
±5.2swing
+0.36adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.16/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.36/bd
By role: declaring +1.50/bd (11) · defending -0.32/bd (13)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +0.51/bd (24)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QS | E.Manoppo | J.Sutherlin – G.Kasle | Closed | 12 | +0.5 | +0.04 | · |
| QS | E.Manoppo | J.Sutherlin – G.Kasle | Closed | 12 | +11.8 | +0.98 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.1 | QS | FINKEL | 2 | 7♣ | ♣3 | = | · |
| +9.4 | QS | FINKEL | 24 | 6♥ | ♠A | -1 | · |
| +6.4 | QS | FINKEL | 20 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | · |
| +6.1 | QS | FINKEL | 23 | 5♣ | ♥A | = | · |
| +4.6 | QS | FINKEL | 8 | 5♠ | ♣9 | = | · |
| +4.1 | QS | FINKEL | 22 | 3♠ | ♦J | +1 | · |
| +3.1 | QS | FINKEL | 17 | 4♠ | ♦10 | +2 | · |
| +3.0 | QS | FINKEL | 3 | 4♥ | ♥3 | -1 | · |
| +3.0 | QS | FINKEL | 18 | 4♥ | ♦8 | +3 | · |
| +2.4 | QS | FINKEL | 21 | 2N | ♦K | -2 | · |
| +2.4 | QS | FINKEL | 25 | 3N | ♠2 | -2 | · |
| +1.6 | QS | FINKEL | 6 | 2♠ | ♥2 | +1 | · |
| +0.9 | QS | FINKEL | 7 | 3N | ♦3 | = | · |
| -0.1 | QS | FINKEL | 1 | 2♣ | ♦K | +1 | · |
| -0.4 | QS | FINKEL | 12 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | · |
| -1.0 | QS | FINKEL | 9 | 3N | ♥9 | +1 | · |
| -2.3 | QS | FINKEL | 16 | 3♠ | ♦Q | = | · |
| -3.4 | QS | FINKEL | 11 | 3♣ | ♦4 | +1 | · |
| -3.7 | QS | FINKEL | 4 | 1N | ♥4 | -1 | · |
| -5.4 | QS | FINKEL | 10 | 1♠ | ♥A | +4 | · |
| -6.7 | QS | FINKEL | 5 | 4♥ | ♣K | +2 | · |
| -7.1 | QS | FINKEL | 26 | 3N | ♠Q | = | · |
| -7.7 | QS | FINKEL | 15 | 6♥ | ♦A | = | · |
| -8.0 | QS | FINKEL | 19 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | · |