EL ASKALANI Amr · EGYPT

362rank
-37.0Butler · 20 bds
-1.85per board
±4.5swing
-1.60vs par /bd
-1.29adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -16.2 -20.8by round

vs par split: bidding +0.08 · play -2.69

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.56/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.29/bd

Card play — on target: declarer play 55.6% · defence 50.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Declarer play·55.6% (9)
Defence·50.0% (4)

vs par by strain: a suit -3.36 (14)

vs par by level: part-score -2.14 (7) · game -5.33 (6) · slam +0.00 (1)

By role: declaring -0.85/bd (-0.77 vs par · 13) · defending -3.70/bd (-3.14 vs par · 7)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.21/bd (-2.40 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable -2.49/bd (-0.80 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 3W.WattarB.Dahlberg – H.HallenClosed10-16.2-1.62-2.30
Round 8W.WattarJ.Pszczola – P.GawrysClosed10-20.8-2.08-0.90

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+6.1Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND203N♥4+1+10
+5.7Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND163N♦6+1+7
+2.8Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS235♣x♠A-1-10
+2.4Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND126♠♦4=+0
+1.6Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND134♠♦2=+0
+1.4Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS223N♣5+2+1
+0.3Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS262♠♥3+1+0
-0.4Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS253♠♥Q+1+1
-1.1Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS273♦♠5-2+0
-1.6Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS213N♦9+1+0
-1.6Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND113N♥6+2-2
-2.3Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND143N♥9+2-1
-2.9Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS284♦♥Q-2-2
-3.1Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS292♠♥Q-1+0
-3.4Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS245♦♣K-2-5
-6.1Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND154♠♦9-1-9
-6.8Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND173♦x♠4=-1
-8.2Round 3SWEDEN SENIORS304♥x♠A+2-8
-8.2Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND194♥♣A=+0
-11.6Round 8APREO LOGISTIC POLAND183♦♣x-1-13