WATTAR Wael · EGYPT
361rank
-54.2Butler · 30 bds
-1.81per board
±4.5swing
-2.37vs par /bd
-1.43adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding -0.82 · play -2.27
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.37/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.43/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 28.6%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | · | 66.7% (3) |
| Defence | · | 28.6% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: a suit -3.52 (23)
vs par by level: part-score -1.58 (12) · game -5.56 (9) · slam -6.00 (2)
By role: declaring -1.41/bd (-2.20 vs par · 20) · defending -2.61/bd (-2.70 vs par · 10)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.22/bd (-2.53 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -2.39/bd (-2.20 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | A.El Askalani | B.Dahlberg – H.Hallen | Closed | 10 | -16.2 | -1.62 | -2.30 |
| Round 8 | A.El Askalani | J.Pszczola – P.Gawrys | Closed | 10 | -20.8 | -2.08 | -0.90 |
| Round 9 | L.Samie | M.Schoenborn – B.Baran | Open | 10 | -17.2 | -1.72 | -3.90 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.1 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 20 | 3N | ♥4 | +1 | +10 |
| +5.7 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 16 | 3N | ♦6 | +1 | +7 |
| +3.7 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 21 | 3♣ | ♣A | +1 | +7 |
| +3.1 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 29 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | +1 |
| +2.8 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 23 | 5♣x | ♠A | -1 | -10 |
| +2.4 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 12 | 6♠ | ♦4 | = | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 13 | 4♠ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 22 | 3N | ♣5 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 30 | 3♥ | ♠A | +1 | +2 |
| +1.2 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 25 | 4♥ | ♠5 | +3 | -10 |
| +0.4 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 24 | 5♦x | ♣6 | -1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 26 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 25 | 3♠ | ♥Q | +1 | +1 |
| -1.1 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 27 | 3♦ | ♠5 | -2 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 21 | 3N | ♦9 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 11 | 3N | ♥6 | +2 | -2 |
| -2.3 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 14 | 3N | ♥9 | +2 | -1 |
| -2.5 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 27 | 3N | ♦2 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.9 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 28 | 4♦ | ♥Q | -2 | -2 |
| -3.1 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 29 | 2♠ | ♥Q | -1 | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 24 | 5♦ | ♣K | -2 | -5 |
| -3.9 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 23 | 2♥ | ♦7 | -2 | -2 |
| -4.3 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 28 | 2♠ | ♣A | = | -12 |
| -4.8 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 26 | 5♣x | ♠5 | -1 | -8 |
| -6.1 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 15 | 4♠ | ♦9 | -1 | -9 |
| -6.8 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 17 | 3♦x | ♠4 | = | -1 |
| -8.2 | Round 3 | SWEDEN SENIORS | 30 | 4♥x | ♠A | +2 | -8 |
| -8.2 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 19 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -11.5 | Round 9 | ARGENT | 22 | 7♥ | ♥5 | -3 | -12 |
| -11.6 | Round 8 | APREO LOGISTIC POLAND | 18 | 3♦ | ♣x | -1 | -13 |