ZHAO Jian · RAINBOW
vs par split: bidding +0.86 · play -0.79
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.07/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.06/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 277 · declarer play 62.5% #231 of 277 · defence 87.5% #85 of 277
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 33.3% (3) | 80.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 83.3% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (9) · a suit +0.10 (19)
vs par by level: part-score -2.81 (16) · game +1.80 (10) · slam +14.50 (2)
By role: declaring -1.15/bd (-2.08 vs par · 12) · defending +0.84/bd (+1.69 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.77/bd (+2.80 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -2.08/bd (-3.08 vs par · 13)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | W.Chen | J.Yao – Y.Tang | Open | 7 | -17.6 | -2.51 | -2.14 |
| Round 3 | W.Chen | P.Gill – G.Fleischer | Closed | 7 | -11.6 | -1.66 | -2.29 |
| Round 5 | W.Chen | H.Ge – C.Feng | Open | 7 | +16.7 | +2.39 | +3.43 |
| Round 6 | W.Chen | F.Wang – Z.Guo | Closed | 7 | +12.1 | +1.73 | +1.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +14.9 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 7 | 6♣ | ♦9 | -4 | +18 |
| +8.7 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 12 | 4♠ | ♥5 | -3 | +11 |
| +5.7 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 9 | 3NT | ♥2 | -4 | +3 |
| +3.7 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 10 | 3NT | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| +3.2 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 4 | 4♠ | ♣9 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.1 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 18 | 2♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +6 |
| +2.7 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 3 | 3NT | ♦9 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 20 | 1NT | ♥Q | +2 | -1 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 5 | 3♣ | ♠A | -2 | -6 |
| +2.0 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 13 | 2♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 2 | 2♥ | ♣A | +3 | +10 |
| +1.1 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 8 | 3♠ | ♦K | -1 | -2 |
| +0.7 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 3 | 2♠ | ♣K | -1 | -3 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 1 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 15 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +2 | +11 |
| -0.7 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 6 | 6NT | ♦Q | = | +11 |
| -1.2 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 6 | 1NT | ♥4 | = | -11 |
| -1.5 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 4 | 1NT | ♣A | -1 | +11 |
| -2.5 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 17 | 4♠ | ♠2 | -1 | -8 |
| -3.4 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 21 | 3♦ | ♣9 | -1 | -11 |
| -3.4 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 11 | 2♦ | ♣7 | -2 | -5 |
| -4.2 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 16 | 1NT | ♠4 | -1 | -10 |
| -4.3 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 7 | 3♠ | ♣8 | -1 | -6 |
| -5.2 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 5 | 2♠ | ♥A | = | -6 |
| -5.7 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 14 | 2♣ | ♠4 | -2 | -5 |
| -5.9 | Round 5 | PHOENIX LEGEND | 2 | 2♥ | ♣5 | +1 | -7 |
| -6.3 | Round 3 | BILSKI | 19 | 5♣ | ♠K | -1 | -3 |
| -7.5 | Round 1 | LUDUS | 1 | 3NT | ♦10 | -1 | -10 |