TIAN Hai Qing · QINGHAI BRIDGE ASSOCIATION
vs par split: bidding +0.68 · play -0.36
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.34/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.84/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 86.7% #70 of 277 · declarer play 70.6% #176 of 277 · defence 73.3% #230 of 277
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 84.6% (13) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 68.8% (16) |
| Defence | 80.0% (10) | 70.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 75.0% (4) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 75.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT -0.08 (12) · a suit +0.43 (44)
vs par by level: part-score +1.32 (28) · game -0.42 (24) · slam -2.25 (4)
By role: declaring -0.17/bd (-1.42 vs par · 26) · defending -0.77/bd (+1.83 vs par · 30)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.69/bd (+0.78 vs par · 27) · not vulnerable -1.59/bd (-0.10 vs par · 29)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | L.Shen | W.Zeng – W.Chen | Closed | 7 | -21.1 | -3.01 | -2.71 |
| Round 2 | L.Wang | S.Wang – Y.Liu | Open | 7 | -15.1 | -2.16 | +1.14 |
| Round 3 | L.Wang | F.Lin – Y.Wang | Open | 7 | -0.4 | -0.06 | +0.29 |
| Round 4 | L.Wang | N.Banerji – BANERJI TAPAS KUMAR | Open | 7 | +12.1 | +1.73 | +3.86 |
| Round 5 | L.Wang | J.Chao – W.Chu | Open | 7 | +15.8 | +2.26 | +1.29 |
| Round 6 | L.Wang | P.Gill – G.Fleischer | Open | 7 | -4.0 | -0.57 | +0.14 |
| Round 7 | X.Wang | J.Alfonsin – M.Villegas | Closed | 7 | -22.7 | -3.24 | -2.71 |
| Round 8 | L.Wang | B.Li – C.Wang | Closed | 7 | +7.7 | +1.10 | +1.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.1 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 4 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | +10 |
| +8.6 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 28 | 3♠ | ♣7 | +1 | +8 |
| +7.2 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 10 | 3♠ | ♥6 | -1 | +9 |
| +6.5 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | +1 | +4 |
| +6.2 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 12 | 5♥x | ♠2 | = | +5 |
| +4.7 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 7 | 6♥ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| +4.4 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 18 | 5♦ | ♥3 | +1 | +13 |
| +4.2 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 16 | 1NT | ♠4 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.1 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 20 | 4♥ | ♦5 | -2 | +3 |
| +4.0 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 18 | 3♠ | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| +3.8 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 13 | 3♠ | ♦Q | -1 | +5 |
| +3.6 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 22 | 3♥ | ♦6 | +1 | +10 |
| +3.6 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 5 | 4♠ | ♠2 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.4 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 21 | 3♦ | ♣10 | -1 | +11 |
| +2.9 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 22 | 3♣ | ♣K | -2 | -1 |
| +2.8 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 27 | 3♥ | ♣8 | +2 | +6 |
| +1.6 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 26 | 2♥ | ♠2 | +1 | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 23 | 3♣ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 10 | 3♣ | ♥Q | = | -1 |
| +0.7 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 6 | 6♠ | ♦3 | = | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 15 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +2 | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 1 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 27 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +11 |
| +0.2 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 23 | 1NT | ♠7 | +3 | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 25 | 3NT | ♠Q | = | +0 |
| +0.0 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 14 | 2♠ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| -0.2 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 2 | 2♠ | ♥K | = | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 19 | 1NT | ♣7 | -1 | -2 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 12 | 4♣ | ♠A | -1 | +2 |
| -0.4 | Round 4 | WEINSTOCK | 24 | 1NT | ♠9 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 3 | 2♠ | ♣K | -1 | +3 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 5 | 2♥ | ♠K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 11 | 2♠ | ♣10 | +2 | -2 |
| -1.2 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 25 | 2♥ | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 19 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -6 |
| -1.9 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 7 | 3♠ | ♠5 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.1 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 11 | 3♣ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 2 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +2 | -10 |
| -2.3 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 9 | 5♣ | ♦3 | -1 | +2 |
| -2.5 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 1 | 3NT | ♦7 | = | +1 |
| -2.6 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 24 | 4♠ | ♦3 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.7 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 8 | 2♠ | ♥2 | -3 | -1 |
| -2.7 | Round 5 | CHANGYU | 3 | 3NT | ♦J | +1 | -1 |
| -3.1 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 20 | 3♣ | ♦4 | = | +0 |
| -3.9 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 4 | 1NT | ♣K | +1 | -12 |
| -4.0 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 9 | 4♠ | ♥4 | -1 | -6 |
| -4.2 | Round 8 | BEIJIING TAILI KANGXIN | 26 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | +1 |
| -5.8 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 17 | 4♠x | ♥5 | -1 | -11 |
| -6.2 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 13 | 6♠ | ♥5 | = | +13 |
| -7.9 | Round 3 | DALIAN | 17 | 3NT | ♣Q | = | -3 |
| -8.3 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 21 | 5♠ | ♥2 | +1 | -11 |
| -8.4 | Round 2 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 14 | 4♠ | ♣6 | = | -7 |
| -8.4 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 16 | 6♠ | ♦Q | -4 | -11 |
| -8.5 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 15 | 4♠ | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| -9.1 | Round 1 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 6 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| -10.5 | Round 6 | BILSKI | 8 | 4♥x | ♥Q | -3 | -9 |