JIN Ke · GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG
vs par split: bidding -1.61 · play +0.69
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.39/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.52/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 81.0% #113 of 277 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 277 · defence 75.9% #211 of 277
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 77.8% (18) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (10) |
| Defence | 28.6% (7) | 90.9% (22) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (6) · ♥ 100.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (7) · ♣ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -3.10 (10) · a suit -0.36 (39)
vs par by level: part-score -1.71 (24) · game +0.91 (22) · slam -8.00 (3)
By role: declaring +1.76/bd (-1.35 vs par · 20) · defending -0.99/bd (-0.62 vs par · 29)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.30/bd (-0.50 vs par · 24) · not vulnerable -0.99/bd (-1.32 vs par · 25)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | X.Sun | H.Poon – C.Loo | Open | 7 | -14.1 | -2.01 | -2.43 |
| Round 2 | X.Sun | W.Lu – X.Wu | Open | 7 | +13.4 | +1.91 | -1.29 |
| Round 3 | Z.Li | J.Chen – C.Lin | Open | 7 | +0.4 | +0.06 | -0.57 |
| Round 5 | X.Liu | M.Ye – B.Cheng | Closed | 7 | +7.3 | +1.04 | -0.43 |
| Round 6 | C.Teodorescu – M.Briciu | Closed | 7 | -0.8 | -0.11 | -1.00 | |
| Round 8 | Z.Li | P.Ilczuk – L.Majdanski | Open | 7 | +1.2 | +0.17 | +0.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.9 | Round 3 | CTBA | 21 | 5♣x | ♦4 | = | +4 |
| +7.0 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 13 | 6♠ | ♥4 | +1 | -13 |
| +6.2 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 14 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | +7 |
| +4.7 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 7 | 6♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +4.2 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 26 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | -1 |
| +4.0 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 9 | 4♠ | ♠2 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.9 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 4 | 2NTx | ♠2 | -1 | -9 |
| +3.7 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 2 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | +5 |
| +3.7 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 9 | 3NT | ♥3 | -2 | +0 |
| +3.6 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 10 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | +3 |
| +3.6 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 5 | 4♠ | ♠2 | -1 | +10 |
| +2.2 | Round 3 | CTBA | 16 | 2♠x | ♠7 | -1 | -6 |
| +2.0 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 8 | 1NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 13 | 1♠ | ♦3 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 12 | 4♦ | ♣2 | -2 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 22 | 2♠ | ♥Q | -1 | +6 |
| +1.6 | Round 3 | CTBA | 19 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | +6 |
| +0.8 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 28 | 4♠ | ♥6 | = | +3 |
| +0.7 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 6 | 6NT | ♣10 | = | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 11 | 3♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -2 |
| +0.2 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 25 | 3♣ | ♦3 | -1 | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 1 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | -1 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | CTBA | 15 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +2 | +11 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 3 | 2♠ | ♣K | -1 | +3 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 5 | 3♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -0.9 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 23 | 2♣ | ♠K | = | +1 |
| -1.1 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 7 | 3♦ | ♦7 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 11 | 4♥x | ♠K | -1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 10 | 3♦ | ♦3 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 3 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 24 | 2♠ | ♣9 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 3 | CTBA | 17 | 4♠ | ♣8 | -1 | -8 |
| -2.8 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 27 | 2♠ | ♦2 | +3 | -6 |
| -2.9 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 8 | 2♠ | ♦3 | = | -5 |
| -3.2 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 1 | 3NT | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.2 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 2 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +1 | -11 |
| -3.2 | Round 5 | ZHONGFU | 4 | 4♠ | ♣9 | -1 | -6 |
| -3.8 | Round 2 | RAINBOW | 14 | 4♠ | ♦J | -2 | -5 |
| -4.0 | Round 3 | CTBA | 18 | 3♠ | ♣A | = | -1 |
| -7.2 | Round 3 | CTBA | 20 | 1NTx | ♦5 | +2 | -10 |
| -8.7 | Round 6 | ROMANIA | 12 | 4♥x | ♠8 | +1 | -8 |
| -9.1 | Round 1 | HUANG LONG TEAM | 6 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +0 |