ZHOU Junyu · ZHONGFU
vs par split: bidding +0.00 · play -1.14
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.55/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.26/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 83.3% (6) |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | 60.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -4.50 (6) · a suit +0.20 (15)
vs par by level: part-score -3.44 (9) · game -0.43 (7) · slam +2.00 (5)
By role: declaring -1.14/bd (-6.25 vs par · 12) · defending +2.20/bd (+5.67 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.03/bd (-6.30 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +1.49/bd (+3.54 vs par · 11)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | Y.Cao | Y.Zhang – Z.Li | Open | 7 | +3.3 | +0.47 | +1.57 |
| Round 3 | K.Tang | T.Chung – J.Chung | Open | 7 | -1.0 | -0.14 | -1.71 |
| Round 4 | Y.Cao | W.Guo – X.Xue | Closed | 7 | +3.8 | +0.54 | -3.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.9 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 25 | 6♦ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| +9.0 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 11 | 6♠ | ♥K | -1 | +14 |
| +8.0 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 9 | 6♣ | ♦A | -2 | +11 |
| +7.8 | Round 3 | CTBA | 21 | 4NT | ♦K | +1 | +17 |
| +3.9 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 27 | 5♣ | ♣A | +1 | +1 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | CTBA | 19 | 3NT | ♠8 | +2 | -17 |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 8 | 2♠ | ♥K | = | +5 |
| +1.0 | Round 3 | CTBA | 17 | 1NT | ♥J | -2 | -1 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | -1 | +6 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 22 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | CTBA | 15 | 3♦ | ♣8 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | CTBA | 18 | 3♣ | ♥2 | -2 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 24 | 5♦ | ♠3 | = | +2 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 13 | 4♥ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 14 | 3♥ | ♠9 | -2 | +0 |
| -4.6 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 23 | 6NT | ♥8 | -2 | -17 |
| -5.0 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 12 | 2♠ | ♥7 | -3 | -7 |
| -5.0 | Round 3 | CTBA | 16 | 6♦ | ♣A | = | +2 |
| -6.9 | Round 3 | CTBA | 20 | 2NT | ♥8 | +2 | -15 |
| -7.5 | Round 4 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 26 | 3♦ | ♣A | +3 | -15 |
| -8.0 | Round 2 | BEYOND | 10 | 4♠ | ♣3 | -1 | -12 |