WEI Jun · JILINSHENGQIAOPAIXIEHUI
vs par split: bidding -0.05 · play -0.71
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.01/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.94/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 82.4% #213 of 579 · declarer play 80.0% #188 of 579 · defence 71.0% #563 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 62.5% (8) | 100.0% (9) |
| Declarer play | 62.5% (8) | 100.0% (7) |
| Defence | 66.7% (15) | 75.0% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 60.0% (5) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT -1.69 (26) · a suit +0.03 (30)
vs par by level: part-score -1.05 (20) · game -1.24 (29) · slam +2.00 (7)
By role: declaring -1.32/bd (-4.64 vs par · 25) · defending -0.62/bd (+2.35 vs par · 31)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.82/bd (-2.07 vs par · 28) · not vulnerable -1.04/bd (+0.54 vs par · 28)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Z.Jin | X.Li – Z.He | Open | 7 | -7.5 | -1.07 | -2.71 |
| Round 2 | Z.Jin | J.Wang – Y.Liu | Open | 7 | +13.0 | +1.86 | +0.00 |
| Round 3 | Z.Jin | A.Mel (De) – K.Baskaran | Open | 7 | -14.7 | -2.10 | -1.43 |
| Round 4 | Z.Jin | D.Li – T.Yao | Closed | 7 | -1.7 | -0.24 | -3.71 |
| Round 5 | Z.Jin | R.Hauge – E.Saelensminde | Open | 7 | +5.9 | +0.84 | +0.57 |
| Round 6 | Z.Jin | P.Zak – J.Zaremba | Open | 7 | -12.6 | -1.80 | +1.43 |
| Round 7 | Z.Jin | J.Alfonsin – M.Villegas | Open | 7 | -11.3 | -1.61 | -0.57 |
| Round 8 | Z.Jin | Y.Zhang – H.Jiang | Open | 7 | -23.2 | -3.31 | +0.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.9 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 25 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +8.0 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 10 | 6NT | ♣9 | -1 | +12 |
| +6.1 | Round 3 | BLADES | 16 | 5♦ | ♠8 | +1 | +11 |
| +6.1 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 4 | 3NT | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| +6.1 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 17 | 4♠ | ♦9 | = | +7 |
| +5.9 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 6 | 6♣ | ♦4 | +1 | +13 |
| +5.8 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 22 | 6♠x | ♣Q | -1 | +13 |
| +5.4 | Round 3 | BLADES | 15 | 3♠ | ♦3 | -2 | +7 |
| +5.4 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 10 | 3NTx | ♦10 | -1 | +8 |
| +4.7 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 9 | 3NT | ♠6 | +2 | +2 |
| +4.7 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 13 | 4♠x | ♣7 | -3 | +4 |
| +3.9 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 27 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | +1 |
| +2.7 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 15 | 3♠ | ♣K | = | +13 |
| +2.6 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 4 | 1NT | ♣6 | -1 | -1 |
| +2.2 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 7 | 5♣ | ♥6 | = | -1 |
| +1.3 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 3 | 2♣ | ♦9 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 24 | 4♠x | ♣9 | -2 | +4 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 28 | 3NT | ♣7 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.7 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 14 | 1NT | ♣4 | -1 | -2 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 5 | 2♥ | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 20 | 3NT | ♦7 | +3 | -12 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 11 | 4♠ | ♣3 | +1 | -10 |
| +0.1 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 7 | 3NT | ♥6 | = | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 13 | 1NT | ♠A | -1 | +1 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 22 | 2♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | BLADES | 18 | 1NT | ♥3 | -2 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 2 | 2♥ | ♠10 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 5 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 9 | 3NT | ♣6 | +1 | +12 |
| -1.5 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 24 | 3NT | ♠5 | +1 | +1 |
| -1.8 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 18 | 1NT | ♥5 | = | +2 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 26 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 12 | 2♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 8 | 3NT | ♦J | = | +1 |
| -2.6 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 1 | 3NT | ♥7 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.8 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 11 | 4♣ | ♦7 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.3 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 2 | 3NT | ♥5 | -3 | -7 |
| -3.3 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 8 | 2♠ | ♥K | +1 | -6 |
| -3.4 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 1 | 2♠ | ♦J | -1 | +2 |
| -3.4 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 3 | 3NT | ♦6 | -3 | -7 |
| -3.5 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 19 | 3♣ | ♠2 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.0 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 14 | 4♠x | ♦A | -1 | -5 |
| -4.3 | Round 3 | BLADES | 17 | 1NT | ♠K | -2 | -6 |
| -4.5 | Round 3 | BLADES | 21 | 6♠ | ♥J | = | +13 |
| -4.6 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 23 | 7♥ | ♦8 | -2 | -17 |
| -4.8 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 23 | 1NT | ♠6 | = | -5 |
| -6.2 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 6 | 3NT | ♦Q | = | -11 |
| -6.9 | Round 3 | BLADES | 20 | 1NT | ♠10 | +3 | -15 |
| -6.9 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 16 | 3NT | ♠2 | +2 | -2 |
| -7.1 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 27 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | -5 |
| -7.6 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | +3 | -2 |
| -8.0 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 28 | 4♥ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| -8.3 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 21 | 4♠ | ♥5 | = | -7 |
| -8.3 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 25 | 5♠x | ♠8 | -4 | -5 |
| -9.9 | Round 3 | BLADES | 19 | 6♣ | ♦7 | -1 | -20 |
| -12.2 | Round 4 | TIANJIN COM-JADEITE | 26 | 3NT | ♣Q | -3 | -17 |