TANG Yi · LUDUS
vs par split: bidding -1.10 · play +0.67
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.12/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.39/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 83.3% · defence 90.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (4) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -0.83 (6) · a suit -0.27 (15)
vs par by level: part-score +0.50 (8) · game +0.70 (10) · slam -6.67 (3)
By role: declaring +0.56/bd (-1.54 vs par · 11) · defending -1.69/bd (+0.80 vs par · 10)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.54/bd (-0.80 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +0.42/bd (-0.09 vs par · 11)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | J.Yao | Z.Shi – C.Ju | Open | 7 | -33.0 | -4.71 | -7.00 |
| Round 5 | J.Yao | P.Chan – S.Mok | Open | 7 | +1.6 | +0.23 | +0.43 |
| Round 6 | J.Yao | Z.Guo – F.Wang | Closed | 7 | +20.6 | +2.94 | +5.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.2 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 9 | 5♦ | ♦Q | -1 | +16 |
| +9.6 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 5 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +10 |
| +5.5 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 8 | 2♠ | ♣A | -1 | +9 |
| +5.4 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 10 | 3NTx | ♠8 | -1 | +8 |
| +4.7 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 1 | 2NT | ♥9 | = | +7 |
| +2.8 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 14 | 5♣ | ♥A | = | +3 |
| +2.1 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 11 | 4♣ | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 7 | 4♠ | ♥2 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 11 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | -10 |
| +0.1 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 13 | 1NT | ♠A | -1 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 3 | 4♥ | ♥2 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 2 | 3♥ | ♣3 | = | +0 |
| -1.8 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 14 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | -4 |
| -2.1 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 12 | 3♥ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 13 | 4♠x | ♥8 | -2 | -4 |
| -6.5 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 6 | 7♣ | ♥10 | = | +2 |
| -6.5 | Round 6 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -6.6 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 8 | 1NTx | ♣4 | +1 | -9 |
| -6.9 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 9 | 6♣ | ♦A | -1 | -10 |
| -7.4 | Round 5 | HKJ9 | 4 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | -12 |
| -13.4 | Round 2 | CHINA OPN(A) | 10 | 6♦ | ♣2 | = | -12 |