LI Ruihua · JILINSHENGQIAOPAIXIEHUI
vs par split: bidding -0.80 · play -0.41
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.09/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.83/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 63.6% #492 of 579 · declarer play 78.6% #205 of 579 · defence 91.7% #171 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 50.0% (8) |
| Declarer play | 85.7% (7) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 95.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 0.0% (2) · ♦ 80.0% (5) · ♣ 50.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +0.21 (14) · a suit -1.77 (35)
vs par by level: part-score -1.70 (23) · game -0.39 (23) · slam -3.67 (3)
By role: declaring -1.68/bd (-4.64 vs par · 25) · defending -0.14/bd (+2.38 vs par · 24)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.43/bd (-1.40 vs par · 25) · not vulnerable -0.40/bd (-1.00 vs par · 24)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | H.Yang | S.Liu – Y.Zhao | Closed | 7 | -9.1 | -1.30 | +0.14 |
| Round 2 | H.Yang | J.Shang – L.Peng | Closed | 7 | -2.5 | -0.36 | +1.71 |
| Round 3 | Z.Liu | C.Fernand – R.Karunatilake | Closed | 7 | -27.2 | -3.89 | -0.86 |
| Round 5 | H.Yang | I.Ivanov – R.Gunev | Closed | 7 | -7.7 | -1.10 | -0.86 |
| Round 6 | J.Jin | P.Niedzielski – L.Majdanski | Closed | 7 | +21.6 | +3.09 | +0.14 |
| Round 7 | J.Jin | C.Pellegrini – A.Wildavsky | Closed | 7 | +1.6 | +0.23 | -1.86 |
| Round 8 | J.Jin | C.Li – G.Xin | Closed | 7 | -22.1 | -3.16 | -6.86 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.4 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 10 | 3NTx | ♠K | -4 | +14 |
| +11.6 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 7 | 6♣ | ♠A | -3 | +14 |
| +8.1 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 11 | 5♣x | ♣2 | -2 | +10 |
| +7.2 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 14 | 5♥ | ♦6 | -1 | +8 |
| +4.3 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 10 | 3NT | ♣7 | +2 | +1 |
| +4.2 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 15 | 4♠ | ♣K | +1 | -11 |
| +3.4 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 1 | 2♠ | ♦J | -1 | -2 |
| +2.9 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 4 | 2♠ | ♦2 | +2 | +10 |
| +2.8 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 18 | 1NT | ♥6 | +1 | -1 |
| +2.0 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 9 | 4♥ | ♣Q | +1 | -12 |
| +2.0 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 26 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 12 | 1NT | ♠K | = | -2 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | BLADES | 17 | 2♠ | ♣3 | -1 | +3 |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 2 | 2♥ | ♠10 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 17 | 2♠ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 23 | 1NT | ♠6 | -1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 19 | 2♦ | ♠A | = | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 13 | 2♠ | ♥A | = | -1 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 11 | 4♠ | ♥J | +1 | +10 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 20 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +2 | +13 |
| -0.4 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 5 | 3♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 14 | 2♥ | ♣K | -1 | +2 |
| -1.0 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 1 | 2♥x | ♦Q | -2 | -3 |
| -1.0 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 7 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 3 | BLADES | 18 | 2♠ | ♣6 | -1 | -2 |
| -1.5 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 8 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | +2 |
| -1.6 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 3 | 2♣ | ♦9 | = | -1 |
| -1.8 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 28 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -1 | -10 |
| -2.0 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 13 | 4♥ | ♥4 | +2 | -1 |
| -2.0 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 21 | 4♠ | ♣3 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.1 | Round 3 | BLADES | 20 | 3NT | ♠10 | = | +13 |
| -2.6 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 4 | 1NT | ♣9 | -1 | +1 |
| -2.9 | Round 3 | BLADES | 19 | 3NT | ♦6 | +2 | +17 |
| -3.0 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 8 | 2♦ | ♣A | -3 | -7 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | SHANDONG CONTRACT BRIDGE ASSOC | 9 | 5♣ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -3.2 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 27 | 3♠ | ♣6 | = | -6 |
| -3.7 | Round 7 | VIRGINIA | 16 | 3♦ | ♠10 | +2 | -10 |
| -4.0 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 22 | 6♦ | ♠A | -1 | -12 |
| -4.1 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 6 | 3NT | ♦Q | -1 | +2 |
| -4.3 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 3 | 3♥ | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -4.5 | Round 5 | HAUGE | 6 | 6NT | ♠8 | +1 | -13 |
| -4.7 | Round 3 | BLADES | 16 | 3NT | ♥8 | +3 | -11 |
| -5.0 | Round 6 | CONSUS POLAND | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | -2 | -11 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 24 | 4♠ | ♥Q | -2 | -8 |
| -6.2 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 5 | 3♠ | ♣3 | -1 | -6 |
| -7.5 | Round 3 | BLADES | 15 | 4♠ | ♣K | -3 | -9 |
| -9.4 | Round 3 | BLADES | 21 | 3♦x | ♥A | -3 | -17 |
| -9.6 | Round 1 | P D PIONEERS | 2 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | -7 |
| -9.6 | Round 8 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 25 | 5♥ | ♠A | -1 | -12 |