GONG Min · PHOENIX LEGEND
vs par split: bidding +1.86 · play +0.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.29/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.28/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 0.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (2) | 0.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 50.0% (2) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (2) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 0.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +1.00 (2) · a suit +2.20 (5)
vs par by level: part-score +2.75 (4) · game +17.00 (1) · slam -7.50 (2)
By role: declaring +0.83/bd (-1.33 vs par · 3) · defending -0.65/bd (+4.25 vs par · 4)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.42/bd (-1.00 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable +0.53/bd (+5.67 vs par · 3)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | H.Ge | J.Diamond – B.Platnick | Open | 7 | -0.1 | -0.01 | +1.86 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.