CAI Lei · COFCO YALONG BAY
vs par split: bidding +1.26 · play +0.06
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.32/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.50/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 579 · declarer play 40.0% #567 of 579 · defence 77.3% #503 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (7) |
| Declarer play | · | 40.0% (5) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 76.5% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.11 (9) · a suit +1.73 (26)
vs par by level: part-score -0.20 (15) · game +2.67 (18) · slam +0.50 (2)
By role: declaring +0.27/bd (-3.77 vs par · 13) · defending -0.46/bd (+4.32 vs par · 22)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.03/bd (+0.60 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -0.34/bd (+1.85 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | X.Chen | B.Gierulski – J.Skrzypczak | Open | 7 | -1.3 | -0.19 | +1.86 |
| Round 3 | J.Lei | C.Li – G.Xin | Closed | 7 | -7.4 | -1.06 | -1.43 |
| Round 6 | X.Cao | Z.Li – Z.Yu | Closed | 7 | -3.6 | -0.51 | +2.86 |
| Round 7 | X.Cao | C.Teodorescu – M.Briciu | Closed | 7 | +21.3 | +3.04 | +1.57 |
| Round 8 | X.Chen | D.Cao – J.Gao | Open | 7 | -15.5 | -2.21 | +1.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.1 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 18 | 2NTx | ♠3 | -2 | +8 |
| +8.2 | Round 2 | VITAS | 13 | 4♠ | ♥5 | -2 | +10 |
| +6.6 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 27 | 5♣x | ♥10 | -2 | +9 |
| +6.1 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 16 | 3NT | ♦4 | +1 | +1 |
| +5.4 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 10 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -2 | +8 |
| +5.0 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 12 | 3NT | ♠3 | -2 | +11 |
| +4.7 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 16 | 3NT | ♣A | +3 | +11 |
| +3.5 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 15 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | -11 |
| +3.2 | Round 2 | VITAS | 14 | 2♣ | ♦K | -2 | +5 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 19 | 3NT | ♦5 | +2 | -17 |
| +2.6 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 21 | 3♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | VITAS | 12 | 2♦ | ♦6 | +2 | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 17 | 2♥ | ♠K | = | -1 |
| +0.0 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 23 | 2♠ | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | VITAS | 11 | 4♠ | ♥J | +1 | +10 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 17 | 2♠ | ♦3 | +2 | -1 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 20 | 4♠ | ♦5 | +2 | +13 |
| -0.4 | Round 7 | ROMANIA | 19 | 3♦ | ♠A | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 18 | 2♥ | ♥5 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.0 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 15 | 2♠ | ♦4 | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 9 | 4♥ | ♠Q | +1 | +12 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 25 | 4♠x | ♦A | -3 | +3 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 26 | 3NT | ♥Q | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 8 | 3NT | ♦J | = | +1 |
| -2.7 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 13 | 1NT | ♠A | -2 | -2 |
| -2.8 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 11 | 2♥ | ♣10 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | VITAS | 8 | 3♣ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | VITAS | 9 | 5♣ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 24 | 4♥ | ♠Q | +2 | -1 |
| -4.0 | Round 6 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 14 | 4♠x | ♥J | -1 | -5 |
| -5.2 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 21 | 6♠ | ♥J | +1 | +13 |
| -6.6 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 22 | 5♦ | ♣4 | = | +1 |
| -7.4 | Round 3 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 20 | 3♣ | ♥K | +2 | -15 |
| -8.0 | Round 2 | VITAS | 10 | 6NT | ♠10 | -1 | -12 |
| -8.0 | Round 8 | SUZHOUTAIHU | 28 | 4♥ | ♠4 | = | +0 |