AYDIN Ata · AYDIN
vs par split: bidding +1.06 · play +1.17
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.30/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 33.3% #578 of 579 · declarer play 88.9% #79 of 579 · defence 95.2% #75 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 28.6% (7) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 87.5% (8) |
| Defence | 100.0% (6) | 93.3% (15) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 33.3% (3) · ♦ 33.3% (6)
vs par by strain: NT +3.78 (9) · a suit +1.69 (26)
vs par by level: part-score +1.00 (13) · game +1.17 (18) · slam +11.00 (4)
By role: declaring +0.34/bd (-1.43 vs par · 14) · defending +0.79/bd (+4.67 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.97/bd (+3.23 vs par · 17) · not vulnerable +0.26/bd (+1.28 vs par · 18)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | U.Suzer | L.Jiang – R.Chen | Open | 7 | +18.5 | +2.64 | +4.43 |
| Round 2 | U.Suzer | H.Jalan – A.Malhotra | Closed | 7 | -0.3 | -0.04 | -2.00 |
| Round 4 | U.Suzer | L.Majdanski – P.Ilczuk | Closed | 7 | +1.4 | +0.20 | +4.86 |
| Round 5 | U.Suzer | W.Zeng – W.Chen | Closed | 7 | -4.7 | -0.67 | -0.86 |
| Round 8 | U.Suzer | N.Li – S.Liu | Closed | 7 | +6.3 | +0.90 | +4.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.7 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 25 | 6♥ | ♦5 | -2 | +13 |
| +9.2 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 7 | 5♣ | ♥6 | -1 | +12 |
| +5.5 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 4 | 3NT | ♣6 | = | -1 |
| +4.6 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 23 | 6NT | ♦10 | -2 | +17 |
| +4.0 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 22 | 6NT | ♦3 | -1 | +12 |
| +3.4 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 1 | 2♠ | ♦J | -1 | -2 |
| +3.1 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 9 | 5♣ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 4 | 3♥ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.2 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 14 | 3♥ | ♥7 | -2 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 13 | 4♥ | ♥J | +2 | +1 |
| +1.9 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 2 | 3NT | ♥5 | -2 | +6 |
| +1.8 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 28 | 3♥ | ♣3 | -1 | +10 |
| +1.0 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 7 | 4♠ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 3 | 3♠ | ♦5 | -2 | +2 |
| +0.7 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 5 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.7 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 24 | 5♦ | ♣4 | = | -2 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 5 | 3♥ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 11 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | -10 |
| +0.2 | Round 1 | ZHEJIANG JUXIN | 6 | 3♣ | ♥A | +1 | +6 |
| +0.1 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 26 | 5♦ | ♣A | +1 | +13 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 22 | 2♥ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 25 | 3NT | ♣4 | +2 | +12 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 2 | 2♥ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | -1 | -6 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 12 | 2♦ | ♦5 | +1 | +1 |
| -1.5 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 27 | 4♠ | ♥J | -1 | +2 |
| -1.7 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 24 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | +1 |
| -1.9 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 3 | 4♥ | ♠8 | -2 | -6 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 26 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 1 | 3NT | ♥5 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.2 | Round 4 | CONSUS POLAND | 27 | 5♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -3.3 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 8 | 3♠ | ♠6 | = | -6 |
| -3.5 | Round 2 | HEMANT JALAN | 10 | 4♠ | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| -5.0 | Round 8 | LUDUS | 23 | 1NT | ♣J | -1 | -5 |
| -6.5 | Round 5 | BRIDGE ASSOCIATION OF FUJIAN P | 6 | 7♣ | ♣3 | = | +2 |