LI Jie · HUBEI JINPAI

611rank
-26.9Butler · 21 bds
-1.28per board
±5.5swing
+0.81vs par /bd
-0.74adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -12.4 -4.4 -10.1by round

vs par split: bidding +1.95 · play -1.14

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.55/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.74/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 33.3% · declarer play 80.0% · defence 77.8%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads0.0% (2)100.0% (1)
Declarer play0.0% (1)100.0% (4)
Defence75.0% (4)80.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT +2.60 (5) · a suit +0.25 (16)

vs par by level: part-score -1.20 (10) · game +3.75 (8) · slam -0.33 (3)

By role: declaring -0.64/bd (-2.75 vs par · 12) · defending -2.13/bd (+5.56 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.28/bd (-0.91 vs par · 11) · not vulnerable -1.28/bd (+2.70 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 3J.WangP.Ilczuk – L.MajdanskiClosed7-12.4-1.77+1.14
Round 5J.WangK.Furuta – H.KakuClosed7-4.4-0.63-0.71
Round 6J.WangS.Behuria – M.HoodaClosed7-10.1-1.44+2.00

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+14.6Round 3CONSUS POLAND217♠♦K=+0
+5.9Round 5JAPAN66♣♠5+1+13
+4.2Round 6AZURE144♥♠A+1+4
+2.0Round 3CONSUS POLAND152♠♦6=+0
+1.0Round 5JAPAN74♠♥5=+0
+0.4Round 5JAPAN52♥♣A+1+0
-0.2Round 6AZURE83♠x♣A-2+4
-0.6Round 5JAPAN22♥♠10+1+0
-1.0Round 3CONSUS POLAND172♦♥J-2+1
-1.1Round 6AZURE94♥♣3=+13
-1.2Round 6AZURE102♠♦A+1+0
-1.8Round 5JAPAN13NT♥7=+0
-1.8Round 6AZURE133♠♥A+1-1
-1.9Round 5JAPAN33♥♠9-2-6
-2.0Round 3CONSUS POLAND193NT♠8+1+17
-2.8Round 6AZURE114♣♦7-1-5
-4.5Round 3CONSUS POLAND182♥♣A-1-5
-7.2Round 6AZURE123NT♠2+2-1
-7.4Round 5JAPAN43NT♣6-1-12
-9.4Round 3CONSUS POLAND203NTx♥8+1+9
-12.1Round 3CONSUS POLAND167♦♣A-1-14