LIU Yan · HONG KONG HAI JIU
vs par split: bidding +0.64 · play +0.29
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.04/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.79/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% #444 of 579 · declarer play 71.4% #303 of 579 · defence 80.6% #455 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 42.9% (7) | 87.5% (8) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (4) | 60.0% (10) |
| Defence | 84.6% (13) | 77.8% (18) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 75.0% (4) · ♥ 80.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 25.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +2.45 (20) · a suit +0.08 (36)
vs par by level: part-score -0.04 (26) · game +1.83 (24) · slam +1.50 (6)
By role: declaring -0.86/bd (-2.76 vs par · 25) · defending -0.81/bd (+3.90 vs par · 31)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.99/bd (+0.89 vs par · 28) · not vulnerable -0.67/bd (+0.96 vs par · 28)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | S.Wang | D.Fischer – B.Saurer | Closed | 7 | -7.7 | -1.10 | +0.71 |
| Round 2 | Q.Li | N.Deng – W.Guo | Open | 7 | -3.1 | -0.44 | -2.00 |
| Round 3 | S.Wang | A.Shah – S.Karmarkar | Open | 7 | +10.9 | +1.56 | +1.71 |
| Round 4 | S.Wang | J.Zhou – Y.Chen | Open | 7 | -32.7 | -4.67 | +1.00 |
| Round 5 | S.Wang | S.Liu – Y.Liang | Open | 7 | +6.5 | +0.93 | +0.71 |
| Round 6 | G.Li | G.Lorentz – S.Burgess | Open | 7 | -2.0 | -0.29 | +3.14 |
| Round 7 | R.Shi | S.He – Z.He | Open | 7 | -2.4 | -0.34 | +0.57 |
| Round 8 | S.Wang | L.Majdanski – P.Ilczuk | Closed | 7 | -16.1 | -2.30 | +1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.9 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 19 | 6NT | ♠8 | -1 | +20 |
| +6.0 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 4 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| +5.9 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 6 | 6♣ | ♠8 | +1 | +13 |
| +5.5 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 9 | 3♦x | ♦4 | -2 | +3 |
| +5.5 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 8 | 2♦ | ♣A | -1 | +9 |
| +5.0 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 16 | 6♦ | ♥6 | = | -2 |
| +5.0 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 12 | 3NT | ♣2 | -2 | +11 |
| +4.7 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 13 | 4♠x | ♥10 | -3 | +4 |
| +4.5 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 21 | 6♠ | ♥J | = | -13 |
| +3.5 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 1 | 1NT | ♥7 | +3 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 14 | 1NT | ♥A | +2 | +1 |
| +3.3 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 10 | 3NT | ♠Q | -1 | +6 |
| +3.1 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 18 | 2NT | ♥5 | -2 | +6 |
| +2.7 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 15 | 3♠ | ♣K | = | +13 |
| +2.2 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 27 | 4♣x | ♥10 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.0 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 15 | 2♠ | ♦10 | = | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 21 | 4♠ | ♣K | -1 | +5 |
| +1.9 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 2 | 3NT | ♥5 | -2 | +6 |
| +1.3 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 11 | 3♣ | ♦7 | = | -1 |
| +1.2 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 24 | 4♠x | ♥Q | -2 | +4 |
| +1.0 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 7 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 17 | 2♠ | ♦9 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 20 | 4♥ | ♦3 | +2 | -13 |
| +0.2 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 6 | 2NT | ♦Q | = | +6 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 22 | 2♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 25 | 3NT | ♣4 | +2 | +12 |
| -0.5 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 1 | 2♠ | ♦J | = | -5 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 2 | 3♥ | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 26 | 4♠ | ♣A | +1 | +13 |
| -1.1 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 9 | 4♥ | ♠2 | = | +13 |
| -1.5 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 28 | 2♥ | ♣3 | = | +7 |
| -1.6 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 3 | 2♣ | ♦9 | = | -1 |
| -1.9 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 3 | 3NT | ♠7 | -2 | -6 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 25 | 4♠x | ♦A | -3 | +3 |
| -2.2 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 7 | 5♣ | ♥Q | = | +1 |
| -2.2 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 17 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 4 | 1NT | ♣6 | -1 | +1 |
| -2.7 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 13 | 2♠ | ♥K | +3 | -2 |
| -2.9 | Round 1 | KASIMIRS DREAMTEAM | 5 | 2♣ | ♠J | -1 | -3 |
| -2.9 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 8 | 1NT | ♣4 | +1 | -6 |
| -2.9 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 26 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.5 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 10 | 3NT | ♥9 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.5 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | -2 | -8 |
| -3.5 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 19 | 3♣ | ♥10 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.8 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 20 | 3NT | ♠10 | +2 | +12 |
| -3.9 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 27 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| -4.5 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 11 | 2♠ | ♥K | +3 | -12 |
| -4.5 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 18 | 2♥ | ♥5 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.0 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 23 | 3♠ | ♦10 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.8 | Round 2 | BEIJING LAWYERS | 12 | 3NT | ♥A | -3 | -4 |
| -7.3 | Round 7 | SHAOGUAN RENHUA | 16 | 3NT | ♠2 | +3 | -3 |
| -7.4 | Round 5 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 5 | 3NT | ♣A | -2 | -8 |
| -8.1 | Round 8 | CONSUS POLAND | 22 | 3NT | ♥9 | +3 | -2 |
| -9.9 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 24 | 6♦ | ♠4 | -2 | -11 |
| -13.3 | Round 6 | LORENTZ | 14 | 3♠x | ♦A | +1 | -14 |
| -14.7 | Round 4 | CHINA HYX | 23 | 6♣ | ♥8 | = | +2 |