MULLAMPHY Matthew · AUSCROWAL
vs par split: bidding +0.29 · play +0.36
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.10/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 77.8% #298 of 579 · declarer play 75.0% #242 of 579 · defence 93.8% #122 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 33.3% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 60.0% (5) | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | 85.7% (7) | 100.0% (9) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 50.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT -0.40 (15) · a suit +1.85 (13)
vs par by level: part-score -0.27 (11) · game +1.19 (16) · slam +2.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.68/bd (-3.50 vs par · 12) · defending -0.65/bd (+3.75 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.78/bd (-1.15 vs par · 13) · not vulnerable -0.83/bd (+2.20 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | R.Klinger | X.Hu – Y.Huang | Open | 7 | -4.2 | -0.60 | +1.43 |
| Round 3 | R.Klinger | K.Jin – Z.Li | Closed | 7 | +13.9 | +1.99 | -0.86 |
| Round 5 | R.Klinger | M.Fleisher – C.Martel | Closed | 7 | +2.1 | +0.30 | +0.29 |
| Round 6 | R.Klinger | J.Liu – H.Yu | Closed | 7 | -14.1 | -2.01 | +1.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.8 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 21 | 4♠ | ♦J | +1 | +17 |
| +5.5 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 4 | 3NT | ♣6 | = | -1 |
| +4.7 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 16 | 3NT | ♥2 | +3 | +11 |
| +4.7 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 1 | 2NT | ♥2 | = | +7 |
| +4.3 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 10 | 3NT | ♣7 | +2 | +1 |
| +3.3 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 10 | 3NT | ♣5 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.0 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 20 | 3NT | ♥8 | +1 | -12 |
| +2.9 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 19 | 3NT | ♠10 | +2 | -17 |
| +2.3 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 12 | 1NT | ♠2 | +2 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 7 | 4♠ | ♣3 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 5 | 3♥ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 14 | 5♠x | ♦A | -2 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 11 | 4♠ | ♣3 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 17 | 2♠ | ♦7 | -1 | -3 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 2 | 3♥ | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 13 | 4♥ | ♣10 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 8 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | +2 |
| -1.9 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 18 | 2NT | ♠3 | -3 | -2 |
| -2.0 | Round 3 | GUANGZHOU ZHAOHENG | 15 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| -2.4 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 14 | 2♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 13 | 1NT | ♠K | -2 | -2 |
| -2.8 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 11 | 3♥ | ♣3 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.9 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 9 | 3NT | ♣2 | +3 | +12 |
| -3.3 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 8 | 3NT | ♦J | +1 | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 3 | 3NT | ♠10 | -3 | -7 |
| -5.5 | Round 2 | PING AN CHINA | 9 | 3NT | ♠4 | +3 | -3 |
| -6.1 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 12 | 3NT | ♥J | = | +1 |
| -6.5 | Round 5 | FLEISHER | 6 | 7♣ | ♥J | = | +2 |