LEE Shing-Kwan · HONG KONG HAI JIU
vs par split: bidding -3.14 · play -4.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.91/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -3.02/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 0.0% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | · |
| Declarer play | 0.0% (1) | · |
| Defence | 50.0% (2) | 100.0% (1) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -8.00 (5) · a suit -5.00 (2)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (1) · game -6.60 (5) · slam -17.00 (1)
By role: declaring -6.45/bd (-14.00 vs par · 4) · defending -0.57/bd (+2.00 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -4.70/bd (-11.50 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -2.90/bd (-1.33 vs par · 3)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 | R.Shi | J.Bian – Y.Lian | Closed | 7 | -27.5 | -3.93 | -7.14 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.