SAMANT Keshav Sakharam · PODDAR DEVELOPERS
vs par split: bidding +0.20 · play +0.57
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.39/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.52/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 86.7% #135 of 579 · declarer play 72.7% #292 of 579 · defence 93.1% #136 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 80.0% (5) | 90.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 60.0% (5) | 83.3% (6) |
| Defence | 100.0% (11) | 88.9% (18) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 75.0% (4) · ♥ 100.0% (5) · ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (4)
vs par by strain: NT +2.44 (16) · a suit -0.03 (33)
vs par by level: part-score +1.28 (25) · game +0.24 (21) · slam +0.33 (3)
By role: declaring -0.95/bd (-2.95 vs par · 20) · defending +0.43/bd (+3.35 vs par · 29)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.66/bd (-0.08 vs par · 25) · not vulnerable +0.42/bd (+1.67 vs par · 24)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | G.Manna | D.Berkowitz – A.Sontag | Open | 7 | -9.4 | -1.34 | -3.29 |
| Round 2 | G.Manna | J.Harsanyi – C.Ganzer | Closed | 7 | -11.3 | -1.61 | -3.71 |
| Round 3 | G.Manna | G.Li – R.Shi | Closed | 7 | -25.5 | -3.64 | -0.57 |
| Round 5 | G.Manna | L.Wang – L.Li | Closed | 7 | -1.6 | -0.23 | +0.00 |
| Round 6 | G.Manna | D.Tang – J.Du | Open | 7 | +25.5 | +3.64 | +6.29 |
| Round 7 | G.Manna | N.Banerji – BANERJI TAPAS KUMAR | Open | 7 | +19.9 | +2.84 | +3.43 |
| Round 8 | G.Manna | C.Ho – A.Chao | Open | 7 | -4.0 | -0.57 | +3.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +17.7 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 16 | 6NTx | ♥J | -5 | +19 |
| +9.6 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 5 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +10 |
| +8.7 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 24 | 5♥ | ♠A | -1 | +11 |
| +7.9 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 9 | 4♦ | ♥Q | +2 | +15 |
| +5.4 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 10 | 3NT | ♠Q | -2 | +8 |
| +4.3 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 8 | 2♠x | ♣A | -1 | +8 |
| +4.2 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 1 | 1NT | ♥9 | +2 | +6 |
| +3.5 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 12 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | +10 |
| +3.4 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 14 | 5♣ | ♥A | +1 | +3 |
| +3.3 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 27 | 3NT | ♥6 | -3 | +6 |
| +2.9 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 15 | 3♦ | ♥A | +1 | +13 |
| +2.2 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 7 | 5♣ | ♥J | = | -1 |
| +2.2 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 14 | 3♥ | ♦5 | -2 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 21 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | +5 |
| +1.9 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 18 | 1NT | ♥3 | -3 | +2 |
| +1.3 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 11 | 2♥ | ♦8 | = | -1 |
| +1.1 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 23 | 1NT | ♦6 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.0 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 7 | 4♠ | ♥4 | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 19 | 1NT | ♥10 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 11 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | -10 |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 20 | 2♥x | ♦7 | -2 | +13 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 20 | 4♠ | ♥9 | +2 | -13 |
| -0.2 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 6 | 2NT | ♦Q | = | -6 |
| -0.3 | Round 6 | INNER MONGOLIA JUNZHENG | 13 | 2NT | ♥Q | = | +1 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 2 | 2♥ | ♠9 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 5 | 2♠ | ♠3 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.1 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 12 | 3♦ | ♦6 | = | +1 |
| -1.6 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 17 | 3♦ | ♠K | -2 | -1 |
| -1.9 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 2 | 3NT | ♥6 | -2 | -6 |
| -1.9 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 3 | 3NT | ♠J | -2 | -6 |
| -2.0 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 19 | 3NT | ♥2 | +1 | +17 |
| -2.0 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 26 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 17 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 7 | WEINSTOCK | 18 | 2♥ | ♣9 | = | +1 |
| -2.4 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 4 | 2♠ | ♣2 | = | -6 |
| -2.5 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 13 | 4♠x | ♣7 | -2 | -4 |
| -2.6 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 9 | 3♣ | ♦A | +2 | -6 |
| -3.0 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 3 | 3♠ | ♣9 | -3 | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 15 | 3♠ | ♥A | -1 | -5 |
| -3.3 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 8 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | -6 |
| -3.3 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 28 | 3♥ | ♣6 | +1 | +6 |
| -3.4 | Round 1 | MARK GORDON | 1 | 3♠ | ♦J | -1 | +2 |
| -4.3 | Round 2 | BERLIN | 10 | 3NT | ♣7 | +2 | -1 |
| -4.8 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 25 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | -1 |
| -6.1 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 16 | 5♦ | ♥6 | +1 | -11 |
| -6.5 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 6 | 7♣ | ♠8 | = | +2 |
| -7.0 | Round 8 | GENTLE | 22 | 4♠ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| -7.4 | Round 5 | QIANWEI | 4 | 3NT | ♣6 | -1 | -12 |
| -14.3 | Round 3 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 21 | 7♠ | ♦K | -1 | -20 |