ILCZUK Piotr · CONSUS POLAND
vs par split: bidding -1.57 · play -0.09
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.21/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.35/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% #144 of 579 · declarer play 77.8% #214 of 579 · defence 100.0% #1 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 83.3% (6) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 80.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (1) | 100.0% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 75.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -5.88 (8) · a suit -0.41 (27)
vs par by level: part-score -1.33 (15) · game -2.12 (16) · slam -1.00 (4)
By role: declaring +1.34/bd (-5.17 vs par · 18) · defending -0.26/bd (+2.06 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +2.15/bd (-2.35 vs par · 17) · not vulnerable -0.93/bd (-1.00 vs par · 18)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | L.Majdanski | C.Li – G.Xin | Closed | 7 | -2.0 | -0.29 | +1.57 |
| Round 3 | L.Majdanski | J.Wang – J.Li | Closed | 7 | +12.4 | +1.77 | -1.14 |
| Round 4 | L.Majdanski | A.Aydin – U.Suzer | Closed | 7 | -1.4 | -0.20 | -4.86 |
| Round 7 | L.Majdanski | K.Tang – Y.Cao | Closed | 7 | -5.4 | -0.77 | -2.29 |
| Round 8 | L.Majdanski | S.Wang – Y.Liu | Closed | 7 | +16.1 | +2.30 | -1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.1 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 16 | 7♦ | ♣A | -1 | +14 |
| +9.4 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 20 | 3NTx | ♥8 | +1 | -9 |
| +8.1 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 22 | 3NT | ♥9 | +3 | +2 |
| +5.0 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 23 | 3♠ | ♦10 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.5 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 18 | 2♥ | ♣A | -1 | +5 |
| +4.3 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 10 | 4♠ | ♦10 | +1 | +1 |
| +3.4 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 14 | 2♥ | ♥5 | = | +6 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 27 | 5♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| +2.9 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 26 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.8 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 18 | 1NT | ♥5 | +1 | -1 |
| +2.5 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 13 | 4♠x | ♥8 | -2 | +4 |
| +2.0 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 19 | 3NT | ♠8 | +1 | -17 |
| +2.0 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 25 | 4♠x | ♦A | -3 | -3 |
| +1.5 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 28 | 2♥ | ♣3 | = | -7 |
| +1.0 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 12 | 2♠ | ♥A | -1 | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 17 | 2♦ | ♥J | -2 | -1 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | -1 | +6 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 22 | 2♥ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 25 | 3NT | ♣4 | +2 | -12 |
| -0.0 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 19 | 2♣ | ♥10 | = | +1 |
| -0.1 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 26 | 5♦ | ♣A | +1 | -13 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 17 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +2 | -1 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 20 | 4♥ | ♥A | +2 | +13 |
| -0.7 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 24 | 5♦ | ♣4 | = | +2 |
| -1.2 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 24 | 4♠x | ♥Q | -2 | -4 |
| -1.5 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 8 | 3♠ | ♠3 | -1 | +2 |
| -1.9 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 15 | 3♦ | ♥A | +3 | -13 |
| -2.0 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 15 | 2♠ | ♦6 | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 21 | 4♠ | ♣3 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.2 | Round 8 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 27 | 4♣x | ♥10 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.1 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 9 | 5♣ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -3.7 | Round 7 | ZHONGFU | 16 | 3♣ | ♦7 | +2 | -10 |
| -4.6 | Round 4 | AYDIN | 23 | 6NT | ♦10 | -2 | -17 |
| -8.6 | Round 2 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 11 | 6♦ | ♥K | +1 | -1 |
| -14.6 | Round 3 | HUBEI JINPAI | 21 | 7♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |