WANG Shiling · XBA

122rank
-2.4Butler · 14 bds
-0.17per board
±7.0swing
-0.71vs par /bd
+0.19adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -22.9 20.5by round

vs par split: bidding -0.38 · play +0.54

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.36/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.19/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 0.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·0.0% (1)
Declarer play100.0% (1)100.0% (1)
Defence·100.0% (4)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 0.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT -11.50 (2) · a suit +2.27 (11)

vs par by level: part-score -2.75 (4) · game +1.44 (9)

By role: declaring -1.83/bd (-4.44 vs par · 9) · defending +2.82/bd (+6.00 vs par · 5)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.06/bd (-2.14 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -0.40/bd (+0.71 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 2H.HuangE.Saelensminde – A.FuglestadOpen7-22.9-3.27-1.57
Round 3H.HuangC.Child – G.HingleClosed7+20.5+2.93+0.14

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+12.5Round 3ROSSLEE193♦x♣2-4+12
+9.5Round 3ROSSLEE215♦♥10-1+11
+7.5Round 3ROSSLEE185♦♥7=-2
+2.2Round 2GILLIS134♠♣J+1+0
+2.1Round 2GILLIS84♠x♦K-2+5
+1.7Round 3ROSSLEE152♠♦Q+1+0
+1.4Round 2GILLIS115♦x♥A-2+4
+0.7Round 3ROSSLEE204♠♦Q+1+0
+0.6Round 2GILLIS144♠♥2+2+14
-2.5Round 3ROSSLEE162NT♠K-2-11
-8.0Round 2GILLIS124♥♥6-1-10
-8.9Round 3ROSSLEE174♥x♦2-2-9
-10.6Round 2GILLIS91NTx♣Q-3-12
-10.6Round 2GILLIS10Pass-12